kyzr
Diamond Member
That 30 year old who decides not to buy health insurance ends up needing 6-months of hospitalization. Who should pay?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That 30 year old who decides not to buy health insurance ends up needing 6-months of hospitalization. Who should pay?
I go for the option that the people who insist we have this shitty system and refuse to allow us to have a public option or universal care should pay for these people.
Can't sqeeze blood out of a stone, folks.
I go for the option that the people who insist we have this shitty system and refuse to allow us to have a public option or universal care should pay for these people.
That 30 year old who decides not to buy health insurance ends up needing 6-months of hospitalization. Who should pay?
Like everyone who tries to keep us in this mess so they can have more money.
I dont care who they are.
I go for the option that the people who insist we have this shitty system and refuse to allow us to have a public option or universal care should pay for these people.
That 30 year old who decides not to buy health insurance ends up needing 6-months of hospitalization. Who should pay?
The 30 year old should form a corporation, run up as many bills as he wants and then declare bankruptcy
That 30 year old who decides not to buy health insurance ends up needing 6-months of hospitalization. Who should pay?
The hospital should bill him.
I realize the left has vested interests in the health insurance companies. After all the dems gave them a gigantic gift. That will ultimately be ruled unacceptable.
But there is no reason I should spend that type of money for years on end on the chance I might get sick.
Paid premiums far exceed any use I have gotten in 15 years. It simply is not cost effective.