2nd male boxer cruises to olympic victory in match against female

But men aren’t men and women or women. There are all kinds of in betweens. We talk about “manly men” and “girly girls”. There are women at these games that I've mistaken for men.


It was a Russian "gender" test of the South African boxer that raised the issue of her gender in the first place.

Russia is currently trying to distrupt Western Democracies with propaganda. It's part of Putin's plan to end Western Democracy.

Only those participating in this plan are denying they're doing it.
And the organization only moved on the female boxer after she beat a Russia one.
 
Or, just figure it out as we did up until 5 seconds ago … when leftists became emotional infants.

This isn’t difficult.
What did we figure out? Dysfunctional vaginas? I hope you won't claims that every woman with a disfunctional vagina is a man.
 
The difference between men and women

Nobody said anything remotely near that. Where did that come from
A month ago, the difference between men and women were quite simple and obvious. Now, we figured out that having a vagina is not enough to be a woman. You have to have a 'right' vagina.
 
Not a functional one. Any other growth is a genetic condition
Not functional you mean this penis can't erect? And can a woman with a penis be allowed in women's bathrooms?
 
A month ago, the difference between men and women were quite simple and obvious. Now, we figured out that having a vagina is not enough to be a woman. You have to have a 'right' vagina.
One that has the ability to function is pretty much the entire point. Even women who can’t have children have all the other parts that work, all the female interior plumbing. Just having a genetic defect that resembles a vagina is nowhere near being a female. Intersex people exist, and men with weird deformities exist.
 
Not functional you mean this penis can't erect? And can a woman with a penis be allowed in women's bathrooms?
Functional as in being able to produce sperm and have the interior male organs that support the ability if one isn’t working

You’re trying really hard to make this confusing when it isn’t at all.

We know what men are from their chromosomes, biological markers, genitalia, organs, etc all of it. The same goes for women. Nothing changes that. We dig
Up bones of ancient people and know exactly if they were male or female

We live in a gender binary that occasionally has genetic deformities. You deal with those as they come, but you’re over here very confused and desperate, trying to poke holes to change a definition.. that won’t work for you

This is very simple.. I’m surprised you can type on a computer yet are unable to grasp this elementary concept
 
Last edited:
One that has the ability to function is pretty much the entire point. Even women who can’t have children have all the other parts that work, all the female interior plumbing. Just having a genetic defect that resembles a vagina is nowhere near being a female. Intersex people exist, and men with weird deformities exist.
It is quite a question what is a genetic defect - a 'wrong' vagina or some set of chromosomes that may not to be known.
 
15th post
Functional as in being able to produce sperm and have the interior male organs that support the ability if one isn’t working

You’re trying really hard to make this confusing when it isn’t at all.

We know what men are from their chromosomes, biological markers, genitalia, organs, etc all of it. The same goes for women. Nothing changes that. We dig
Up bones of ancient people and know exactly if they were male or female

We live in a gender binary that occasionally has genetic deformities. You deal with those as they come, but you’re over here very confused and desperate, trying to poke holes to change a definition.. that won’t work for you

This is very simple.. I’m surprised you can type on a computer yet are unable to grasp this elementary concept
A month ago you people were trying hard to convince that a person with a vagina is a woman, and a person with a penis is a man. And it was an elementary concept. Now, a person with a vagina can be a man, if he/she/they have a wrong vagina. And it is an elementary concept now.

Let's put those bones aside. I asked a simple question - should a woman with a penis be allowed in women's bathrooms?
 
A month ago you people were trying hard to convince that a person with a vagina is a woman, and a person with a penis is a man. And it was an elementary concept. Now, a person with a vagina can be a man, if he/she/they have a wrong vagina. And it is an elementary concept now.
I have answered that many times, you’ve backed up and repeated the same thing over and over despite multiple clear answers. I don’t think you want to actually know anything, just likely a sadist who wants to try to Poke pointless holes in solid, defined arguments
Let's put those bones aside. I asked a simple question - should a woman with a penis be allowed in women's bathrooms?
That’s an invalid question, A woman can’t have a real penis, just an abnormal growth, likely related to a genetic deformity which requires treatment.
 
Last edited:
A month ago you people were trying hard to convince that a person with a vagina is a woman, and a person with a penis is a man. And it was an elementary concept. Now, a person with a vagina can be a man, if he/she/they have a wrong vagina. And it is an elementary concept now.

Let's put those bones aside. I asked a simple question - should a woman with a penis be allowed in women's bathrooms?
:auiqs.jpg:
 
Thread summary:

Most Republicans have severe trouble identifying what a woman is.

That is, they're very confused about gender matters.

We have trouble identifying what a democrat male is as well, cuz most are pretty feminine afterall
 
Back
Top Bottom