Your beating a dead horse. Being qualified doesn’t mean any Tom Dick and Harry can buy any firearm they want even if you have the money. . You want posses a machine gun after 1986 ? It gets even harder. Get a dealers license, join the military or police forces or move to Israel.
“You can purchase post 1986 machine guns if you are a Class 3 Firearms Dealer. Or, you can build machine guns if you are a Class 2 Firearms Manufacturer.”
Being in the military or police only allows you to carry the firearms the GOVERNMENT provides for you. A cop can no more carry his own fully automatic weapon than joe citizen can. And the military only carries weapons of any kind on duty and even then only what their chain of command allows and often with miniscule amounts of ammo. When I stood guard duty, I was issued FIVE ROUNDS of 5.56mm ammo in a magazine with tape over the mouth so it couldn't be inserted in the magazine well without leaving evidence. Among other things I was guarding a small arms repair and storage facility containing thousands of M-16s, M-60s and M-2s.
Wrong bubba. A cop can and should be able to respond to terrorism and be better armed than the average citizen.
That’s not responding to my post.
Prove it....post the regulations.
That’s all you’re getting.
Most police departments that issue self defense firearms, still make available other more offensive weapons when needed. Like the military, they should be allowed to respond in kind. And...BTW, police seldom carry their issued firearms for self defense when off duty. They idea you civilians should be able to carry what a cop or military does when on duty is ignorant.
There are few Communists left. Keep up to date.
In almost all cases off duty cops are REQUIRED to carry firearms. Most opt to carry something smaller than their duty weapons for comfort and ease of concealment, but the duty weapon is perfectly permissible. In the few departments that don't require off duty cops to carry, they permit it.
So you agree that even police who carry duty weapons feel the need for ease of carry and concealment far out ways. the need to be armed like police for citizens.
Of course they do. They are required to be permitted to carry to whatever extent is necessary in the state they reside. Unless there is reciprocity, they are no more legal across state lines than a civilian. So, it isn’t like they can carry at will. They have to obey carry permitted laws just like they were a civilian.
And there are no federal restrictions on such an upper.
So there you you go….you can have an M4, even though it’s so called banned.
Federal law says otherwise:
You didn’t even read you’re own post did you read the exceptions. The officer still has to be qualified as any civilian would IN HIS OWN STATE, before he’s allowed to carry across state lines as an off duty police . ALSO , the state has its own regulations for concealed off duty police. An out of state officer still has to be aware if those restrictions .
It’s banned to have a Military Grade FA complete M4 ( not a 40-60 year old FA Lower Receiver That is Legally transferable upgraded with Parts ( M4 Upper Receiver )
It would be just regulating the AR15 gunaholic. It would be regulating all firearms. Of which, there are 48,000 plus firearm deaths each year, and the second leading cause of death for kids.
Fentanyl kills more Americans than non Accident / Non Suicide Firearms Deaths
