2020 election was rigged (not stolen)

[BackAgain]

Um…..that is the way our Judicial System works Skippy.

I know how it works, retard. And it remains true that a case dismissed on procedural grounds prior to reaching the merits doesn’t establish a damn thing. As you know.

If you are making a claim in court, the burden of proof is on you.

You don’t reach the burden of proof if the case is never reached on the merits, you smarmy dipshit.

The fact that Trump had no proof to support his claims does nothing to prove those claims are true

It’s not a fact that he had no proof. As you know. A case dismissed before the proof is presented doesn’t qualify as a dismissal on the merits, you jackass.

 

[Lastamender]

TGP EXCLUSIVE: Massive 2020 Voter Fraud Uncovered in Michigan - Including Estimated "800,000 Ballot Applications Sent to Non-Qualified Voters" - Bags of Pre-Paid Gift Cards, Guns with Silencers, Burner Phones, and a Democrat-Funded Organization with

My estimate is over 800,000 ballot applications were sent to non-qualified voters in Michigan.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[rightwinger]

I know how it works, retard. And it remains true that a case dismissed on procedural grounds prior to reaching the merits doesn’t establish a damn thin. As you know.

You don’t reach the burden of proof if the case is never reached on the merits, you smarmy dipshit.

It’s not a fact that he had no proof. As you know. A case dismissed before the proof is presented doesn’t qualify as a dismissal on the merits, you jackass.

Nice try Skippy, but not all of Trumps frivolous claims were dismissed for lack of standing. Most were dismissed for being frivolous

 

[Rawley]

Hard to argue with someone who just denies any evidence that doesn’t support their claims

Yup. You should be honest about the cases, rather using Democratic party talking points. It's lazy,

 

[Rawley]

Nice try Skippy, but not all of Trumps frivolous claims were dismissed for lack of standing. Most were dismissed for being frivolous

nope Do your homework

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I'm sorry, did I miss something? What was rigged?

The 2020 presidential election

 

[Billo_Really]

The 2020 presidential election

No it wasn't!

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

No it wasn't!

Guess you didn’t read the OP. It’s OK.

 

[BackAgain]

Nice try Skippy, but not all of Trumps frivolous claims were dismissed for lack of standing. Most were dismissed for being frivolous

False. As you know, ya retard.

 

[Billo_Really]

Guess you didn’t read the OP. It’s OK.

I read the OP, it didn't make any sense and it sure did not prove the election was rigged!

This wad one of the most free and fair elections in recent times.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I read the OP, it didn't make any sense and it sure did not prove the election was rigged!

This wad one of the most free and fair elections in recent times.

Guess you didn’t listen to the audio. It’s OK

Twitter files 7.0 show FBI pressured social media platforms to âdiscreditâ Hunter Biden laptop story

Authorised by the new Twitter owner and CEO, Elon Musk, âTwitter Filesâ has been a series of posts in the form of a thread of tweets which have been disclosing the companyâs once-secret communications with the help of independent journalists.

www.wionews.com

 

[rightwinger]

False. As you know, ya retard.

Afraid they were Skippy

Your attempts to rewrite history fail miserably

 

[Faun]

Why do you think they did it? Give me an educated guess.

Why no answer to this (in bold)...

remind me where it was a problem for you when the FBI interfered with the election in 2016 by publicly announcing they were reopening the investigation into Hillary's email server because they thought they found more email.

 

[Faun]

Trump was correct. Trump is clairvoyant.

08/17/2020

Trump: ‘The only way we’re going to lose this election is if the election is rigged’​

Trump says that about every race he's in. If he wins, it was fair; If he loses, he was robbed. He knows his base is ignorant and will fall for it every time.

 

[Faun]

I’m not at all surprised at how dishonest and stupid you are. Cases being tossed before reaching the merits doesn’t support you claim at all. Ever. As you know.

Even cases where merits were reviewed were tossed.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why no answer to this (in bold)...

remind me where it was a problem for you when the FBI interfered with the election in 2016 by publicly announcing they were reopening the investigation into Hillary's email server because they thought they found more email.

Already explained and answered. Now answer me please.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Glad we agree. In terms of HRC it was because of Weiner and Huma Aberdeen. If Weiner doesn’t send lude photos this never happens. But HRCs campaign did delete emails, did bleach the server, did smash blackberries and iPads? Yet no one on your side of the aisle was banned from social media for saying it was a witch hunt or that Comey was biased. In this case even the NYP was censored. That’s the real issue. Unlike on this site, we could not have such debate on Twitter or FB. It was censored to favor one side.

Faun

As you can see I answered

 

[Faun]

Faun

As you can see I answered

Glad we agree. In terms of HRC it was because of Weiner and Huma Aberdeen. If Weiner doesn’t send lude photos this never happens. But HRCs campaign did delete emails, did bleach the server, did smash blackberries and iPads? Yet no one on your side of the aisle was banned from social media for saying it was a witch hunt or that Comey was biased. In this case even the NYP was censored. That’s the real issue. Unlike on this site, we could not have such debate on Twitter or FB. It was censored to favor one side.

You're conflating replying to my post with answering the question in my post.

My question was, why was that not a problem for you. Instead of answering that, you explained why the FBI reopened the investigation.

I don't recall you ever saying the FBI shouldn't have publicly announced they were reopening that investigation. Perhaps I'm wrong. Show me...

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You're conflating replying to my post with answering the question in my post.

My question was, why was that not a problem for you. Instead of answering that, you explained why the FBI reopened the investigation.

I don't recall you ever saying the FBI shouldn't have publicly announced they were reopening that investigation. Perhaps I'm wrong. Show me...

Honestly I was so certainly HRC would win it did not seem like something that would impact the election. I was hoping Trump would win but believed it to be unlikely at best.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You're conflating replying to my post with answering the question in my post.

My question was, why was that not a problem for you. Instead of answering that, you explained why the FBI reopened the investigation.

I don't recall you ever saying the FBI shouldn't have publicly announced they were reopening that investigation. Perhaps I'm wrong. Show me...

What would be the better question is how would I feel if that data was suppressed and not released? That would be terrible IMO.