- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,015
- 65,979
- 2,635
Imbecile, when those people appeared before the state legislatures, they were told to their face they were not under oath. You should have paid better attention so you would know what was going on.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
2020 Arizona Election Audit Release: September 24, 2021
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,563
- 58,317
- 2,645
Only if it is relevant and allowed into the record as testimony, and even then, perjury would have to be something material and demonstrably false, with a proven intent of lying. No, you can't and won't be charged with perjury, if you insist in an affidavit on a Trump fundraising site that you saw some unnamed person change votes, even though that never actually happened. Not how it works.A sworn affidavit is just as much subject to perjury charges as sworn testimony in open court.
The affidavits, in this case, are garbage. Affidavits are nothing, until and unless they become sworn testimony in court. And if you had 100 people swear on a website that they saw someone change votes, yet not a shred of evidence of that actually happening, that would STILL get you absolutely nowhere. And not one of the affiants would ever be charged with perjury. In fact, as a lawyer, you would probably get your affidavits tossed back at you by the judge, as they don't reveal anything specific or material.
In this case, we have thousands of them with just as many different, varied, unevidenced claims. Like, they are all over the map. It's so obviously a hot pile of garbage that lawyers are getting sanctioned simply for trying to push them into a courtroom.
Last edited:
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
and Gorboal warming is real fucking delusional troll.
well, yes the climate is changing, this is a proven fact.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,015
- 65,979
- 2,635
False. Nothing in the report says they're illegal. The word, "illegal," doesn't even appear in the report.50,000illegal votes have been found
Last edited:
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
False. Nothing in the report says their illegal. The word, "illegal," doesn't even appear in the report.
It does not use the word illegal or fraudulent or anything of the kind.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,015
- 65,979
- 2,635
Richard Hopkins signed affidavit he didn't even write -- then he recanted his claims. He still wasn't charged with a crime.then they were affidavits
But since they were affidavits you should stop lying now.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,073
- 9,708
- 2,138
No. There was no voter fraud according to Cyber Ninja's. I suppose that makes them Zionists now, huh, TootieFrootie?
That is a flat out lie.
There are at least 40k votes IDed by the CNs as likely frauds, and the margin was under 11k, so the issue is
Finishing the audit by enforcing the subpoenas.
And then the CNs will affirm or deny fraud...
That your side is lying so hard about this speaks volumes about what you already knew....
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,563
- 58,317
- 2,645
Haha, they didn't invent enough nonsense, so you have to invent even more? You are making stuff up. And it is hilarious.There are at least 40k votes IDed by the CNs as likely frauds
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,073
- 9,708
- 2,138
I have a better idea.... fuck off, it's over. It's been almost a year and you rightards have yet to prove voter fraud beyond a few isolated cases.
Lol....
If there was no fraud, why not allow the audit to finish by enforcing the subpoenas.....
Lol....
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
There are at least 40k votes IDed by the CNs as likely frauds, and the margin was under 11k, so the issue is
The Ninjas did not say they were likely frauds, you are making that part of it up
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
That is a flat out lie.
There are at least 40k votes IDed by the CNs as likely frauds, and the margin was under 11k, so the issue is
Finishing the audit by enforcing the subpoenas.
And then the CNs will affirm or deny fraud...
That your side is lying so hard about this speaks volumes about what you already knew....
The audit is done, the report has been filed and the Ninjas are off the clock.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,073
- 9,708
- 2,138
The Ninjas did not say they were likely frauds, you are making that part of it up
They are flagged for a reason....
Why not enforce the subpoenas and let the audit finish...
Why the fear and hate....
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
Richard Hopkins signed affidavit he didn't even write -- then he recanted his claims. He still wasn't charged with a crime.
Project Veritas wrote his for him. I heard the Postmaster General of the place he accused of cheating was suing him
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 92,563
- 58,317
- 2,645
The best part of all this is how the Cyber Ninjas conned Trump and his loyalists. Thanks for the free vacation, suckers.The audit is done, the report has been filed and the Ninjas are off the clock.
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
They are flagged for a reason....
Why not enforce the subpoenas and let the audit finish...
Why the fear and hate....
And they have been responded to. The audit if finished, they is why they submitted their final report.
EMH
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2021
- 14,073
- 9,708
- 2,138
The audit is done, the report has been filed and the Ninjas are off the clock.
Another flat out lie....
That is why it was called a PRELIMINARY audit, moron....
- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,015
- 65,979
- 2,635
What else do you think there is to find? But since you need more, you didn't realize it, but even you just admitted there was no fraud found.Lol....
If there was no fraud, why not allow the audit to finish by enforcing the subpoenas.....
Lol....
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
Another flat out lie....
That is why it was called a PRELIMINARY audit, moron....
Its over, move on to Tx that is your next hope. With the way the Az audit went Biden might end up taking Tx
- Nov 14, 2011
- 121,015
- 65,979
- 2,635
But never charged with perjury for signing a false affidavit.Project Veritas wrote his for him. I heard the Postmaster General of the place he accused of cheating was suing him
- Feb 22, 2017
- 104,254
- 35,054
- 2,290
They are flagged for a reason....
About this...one of their "flagged" votes were ones they say people potentially voted in more than one county. Since they did not have records from other counties we can only assume they determined this by two people with the same name voting in two different counties.
Why did they not investigate this further? No subpoenas necessary, just a little bit of leg work. I am a data analyst and if I turned such half done work into my boss if I did not get fired I would sure as hell get sent back to finish the job....so why did they not do so?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 230
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 915
- Replies
- 10
- Views
- 446
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 76
- Views
- 252
- Replies
- 457
- Views
- 4K
- Replies
- 132
- Views
- 5K
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 77
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8049
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-