2017 Co2 watch thread--How high will it go?

[beagle9]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

. And these figures are being thrown against what? Any global event to talk about, where these figures got so out of whack that they caused that event, and then was it man's fault or something man can't control anyway ??

 

[beagle9]

We're clearly doomed.
You know what would help?
If we boot 20 million illegals.
Back in their home countries they would release a lot less CO2.
It's the only chance to save the planet.

. And the out of control breeding continues. America needs to understand that it can't control the world, but it sure can control the borders.

Off subject

. How so ? Doesn't it all contribute in some form or another ?

 

[Old Rocks]

Why not, that is the typical intellectual level of our 'Conservatives'.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

lol...

And Old Fraud does not have a clue about what CO2 actually does or how CO2 actually does it..

A Study I am currently reading and commenting on, says your magical back-scatter is meaningless and INCREASING CO2 actually results in cooling of the lower troposphere.

The empirical evidence collected shatters the warmers point of view and theroy.

 

[Old Rocks]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

. And these figures are being thrown against what? Any global event to talk about, where these figures got so out of whack that they caused that event, and then was it man's fault or something man can't control anyway ??

First, that is measured empirical data from all over the world by a first class scientific institution, the Scripps Institute. Second, if you want to argue the physics of how a GHG works, argue that with the American Institute of Physics. You are going to lose with your obvious low scientific knowledge base. And, yes, the increase is very much due to man. We have the records of our use of fossil fuels to prove it. That you could even question that is indictative of the fact that you have never even looked at the facts surrounding the science.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Look, you dumb ass, what GHGs do in the atmosphere have nothing to do with liberal or conservative politics. That your abysmal knowledge base lets you make idiotic statements like stop breathing demonstrates what your level of willful ignorance is. What is being done about GHG emissions is the switch to renewable energy. Developing the batteries of the future so that transportation contributes very little to the GHGs.

. What's more hilarious is that you figured him to be serious about the exhaling comments. Wow.

It's no coincidence that there's a cliché about being “as dumb as [old][i] rocks[/i]”

 

[Old Rocks]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

lol...

And Old Fraud does not have a clue about what CO2 actually does or how CO2 actually does it..

A Study I am currently reading and commenting on, says your magical back-scatter is meaningless and INCREASING CO2 actually results in cooling of the lower troposphere.

The empirical evidence collected shatters the warmers point of view and theroy.

Well now, post that silly link, Silly Billy, and we will demolish it. And that is why you did not post it, because you know that is the case.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

 

[Billy_Bob]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

. And these figures are being thrown against what? Any global event to talk about, where these figures got so out of whack that they caused that event, and then was it man's fault or something man can't control anyway ??

First, that is measured empirical data from all over the world by a first class scientific institution, the Scripps Institute. Second, if you want to argue the physics of how a GHG works, argue that with the American Institute of Physics. You are going to lose with your obvious low scientific knowledge base. And, yes, the increase is very much due to man. We have the records of our use of fossil fuels to prove it. That you could even question that is indictative of the fact that you have never even looked at the facts surrounding the science.

You shout "but I got scientists" and they belong to a "political organization" that gets funding from the lie...

 

[beagle9]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

. And these figures are being thrown against what? Any global event to talk about, where these figures got so out of whack that they caused that event, and then was it man's fault or something man can't control anyway ??

First, that is measured empirical data from all over the world by a first class scientific institution, the Scripps Institute. Second, if you want to argue the physics of how a GHG works, argue that with the American Institute of Physics. You are going to lose with your obvious low scientific knowledge base. And, yes, the increase is very much due to man. We have the records of our use of fossil fuels to prove it. That you could even question that is indictative of the fact that you have never even looked at the facts surrounding the science.

. After the scientist were found to be padding the numbers, what can we believe ?

 

[Old Rocks]

The very large and looming danger of the GHGs is that this warming will lead to the release of the GHGs from clathrates and permafrost. If at some time, these begin to release about the same amount of GHGs as mankind, then the game is over. We will not be able to change the warming until it has ran it's full course.

 

[Old Rocks]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

. And these figures are being thrown against what? Any global event to talk about, where these figures got so out of whack that they caused that event, and then was it man's fault or something man can't control anyway ??

First, that is measured empirical data from all over the world by a first class scientific institution, the Scripps Institute. Second, if you want to argue the physics of how a GHG works, argue that with the American Institute of Physics. You are going to lose with your obvious low scientific knowledge base. And, yes, the increase is very much due to man. We have the records of our use of fossil fuels to prove it. That you could even question that is indictative of the fact that you have never even looked at the facts surrounding the science.

. After the scientist were found to be padding the numbers, what can we believe ?

Links, asshole, links. And reputable sources. Rags like Breibart are not reputable.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

lol...

And Old Fraud does not have a clue about what CO2 actually does or how CO2 actually does it..

A Study I am currently reading and commenting on, says your magical back-scatter is meaningless and INCREASING CO2 actually results in cooling of the lower troposphere.

The empirical evidence collected shatters the warmers point of view and theroy.

Well now, post that silly link, Silly Billy, and we will demolish it. And that is why you did not post it, because you know that is the case.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

You couldn't demolish a pile of shit.

The paper will be published soon enough and the findings are going to turn the AGW hypothesis on its head.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The very large and looming danger of the GHGs is that this warming will lead to the release of the GHGs from clathrates and permafrost. If at some time, these begin to release about the same amount of GHGs as mankind, then the game is over. We will not be able to change the warming until it has ran it's full course.

LOL... where do you dig up this crap?

Two studies this year show the permafrost contains far less CO2 than you alarmists are claiming..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

. And these figures are being thrown against what? Any global event to talk about, where these figures got so out of whack that they caused that event, and then was it man's fault or something man can't control anyway ??

First, that is measured empirical data from all over the world by a first class scientific institution, the Scripps Institute. Second, if you want to argue the physics of how a GHG works, argue that with the American Institute of Physics. You are going to lose with your obvious low scientific knowledge base. And, yes, the increase is very much due to man. We have the records of our use of fossil fuels to prove it. That you could even question that is indictative of the fact that you have never even looked at the facts surrounding the science.

. After the scientist were found to be padding the numbers, what can we believe ?

Links, asshole, links. And reputable sources. Rags like Breibart are not reputable.

A moron like you gets to decide what is or is not reputable? You really are a fucking moron...

 

[beagle9]

The very large and looming danger of the GHGs is that this warming will lead to the release of the GHGs from clathrates and permafrost. If at some time, these begin to release about the same amount of GHGs as mankind, then the game is over. We will not be able to change the warming until it has ran it's full course.

IF, IF, IF, IF.... Big word that IF word is ain't it ?? Since Bill Clinton, we still don't know what the definition of "IS" is, so aren't you giving the nation way to much credit to figure out this ominous climate change ?? LOL...... It's exactly what you are hoping for (the dumbness) to continue ain't it ?

 

[Old Rocks]

Yawn.....

Breathless Mathew worrying about something that does not do what he thinks.. A measurement that ranges from 380ppm to 411ppm depending on where you are on the globe..

Tell me Mathew did we have glaciation when the earth CO2 levels were above 7,000ppm?

Once again, you are pulling figures out of your ass, and they stink, Silly Billy. Scripps has many CO2 measuring stations worldwide, and the lowest recent figures, from New Zealand and Antarctica showed 398 ppm of CO2.

Home | Scripps CO2 Program

lol...

And Old Fraud does not have a clue about what CO2 actually does or how CO2 actually does it..

A Study I am currently reading and commenting on, says your magical back-scatter is meaningless and INCREASING CO2 actually results in cooling of the lower troposphere.

The empirical evidence collected shatters the warmers point of view and theroy.

Well now, post that silly link, Silly Billy, and we will demolish it. And that is why you did not post it, because you know that is the case.

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

You couldn't demolish a pile of shit.

The paper will be published soon enough and the findings are going to turn AGW hypothesis on its head.

Promises, promises.

 

[ScienceRocks]

 

[ScienceRocks]

November 24: 403.08 ppm
November 23: 403.47 ppm
November 22: 403.55 ppm
November 21: 403.54 ppm
November 20: 403.40 ppm

 

[skookerasbil]

Just have to say......the OP is clearly in the middle of some kind of derangement syndrome thing after the election. These people still don't get they have been on this bomb throwing/scare mongering crusade for 2 decades to zero avail. Fucking duh........nobody out there gives a flying rats ass about 2017 CO2 levels except the alarmist OCD's.

[URL=http://s42.photobucket.com/user/baldaltima/media/Trump.jpg.html][/URL]

 

[Old Rocks]

Well, by the end of 2017, we will see how that flies. If the asshole does half the things he promised, we will see people out on the streets in all the cities in the US.