they can do what they have to do
everyone around here is pretty much armed
it is not the money stupid
it is defending life
it is the bad guy who chances killing over money
quit blaming the law abiding for the actions of the law breakers
And neither simple question could you answer. So be it, John Wayne.
they dont tell the public there policy you idiot
Oh, but they do, dummy:
https://www.aba.com/aba/toolbox/brd/3tool.pdf
And:
teller instuctions on robbers - Google Search
dont be absurd
no bank reveals their internal securities policies
no wonder you are not to be taken seriously
and are a tool for humorous reasons
--LOL
The policies of banks during robberies is well-known, dumbass. Like 7-11, and all other major chains, it starts with do as he says, give him what he wants, and get him the hell back out the door. The cops can deal with him, they get paid to and you don't. Go after him and your ass is fired. That is all policy for the employees' protection.
Works like this:
"Should a bank teller have been fired for chasing down a robber?
Tuesday Aug 4, 2009 3:15 PM
Email
A Key Bank teller in Lower Queen Anne, Washington, nabbed a bank robber and held him until the police arrived – and was subsequently fired by his employer, which claimed his risky behavior could have endangered bystanders. Was the bank right in upholding their policy? Or was it a harsh reaction?"
Should a bank teller have been fired for chasing down a robber?