2 Items for Debbie Wasserman-Schultz

protectionist

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2013
58,626
19,345
2,250
On the morning show, FOX News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Debbie Wasserman-Shultz, the Chairwoman of the Democratic National committee, said two things that seriously need correcting. First, she said the the issue of the emails that Hillary Clinton had possession of (and callously exposed to the world), is a "distraction". No ma'm. This is a critical issue of NATIONAL SECURITY, which we probably don't even know, the ramifications of. The consequences of countries like Iran, North Korea, Mexico, China, as well as non-nation enemies like ISIS, al Qaeda, the Taliban, etc, are, at this point, yet to be determined. We're talking about the highest top secret classified information (SAP) in the US govt.

I'm willing to guess that in the future, we sell see Americans dying, either in battlefields abroad, or in cities and towns right here in the US, because of the cavalier and irresponsible attitude of Clinton, and now DWS as well.

Second, the Chairwoman said in this presidential election, we have a choice between a Republican who is just for big business and the rich, and the Democrat (probably Hillary Clinton she thinks) who is for the people. Au contraire, miss Chairwoman. You have it exactly backwards. Hillary has run up an enormous political debt to "big business" with a whopping 73% of her donations coming from them. In contrast, her Democrat Party co-candidate Sanders, has gotten less than half of his donations from the big boys, and Trump has received a miniscule 7% from them.

So by DWS standards, if we are to base our voting on who is hooked up to big business and who isn't, then we sure should not be voting for Hillary, and we sure should be voting for Donald Trump. Did anybody ever guess that Debbie Wasserman-Shultz would become an advocate for Donald Trump to be POTUS ? Well, this morning, she did just that.

Hillary's Big $$ Donors >>> (Career 2002-2008)

1. Citigroup Inc - $891,501

2. DLA Piper (a global law firm) - $852,873

3. Goldman Sachs - $831,523

4. JPMorgan Chase Bank - $801,380

5. Morgan Stanley (multinationalfinancial services corporation ) - $765,242

6. University of California - $686,509

7. Time Warner - $603,170

Note: How does there get to be more than 2/3 of a Million $$ going to Hillary from a PUBLIC entity ? (University of California) Is all of the PUBLIC in California cool with that ?
wtf20.gif


https://www.opensecrets.org/politici...9&cycle=Career

Now lets look at some of the really big bucks$$ of the 2016 campaign >>

1. Soros Fund Management - $7,039,800

2. Euclidean Capital - $3,502,700

3. Pritzker Group - $2,814,343

4. Saban Capital Group - $2,531,995

5. Paloma Partners - $2,505,400

https://www.opensecrets.org/pres16/c...p?id=N00000019
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top