1st CRT, Now Democrats Want To Teach 'Pornography Literacy' To Children?!

How do conservatives treat Black people like second class citizens?
Stop and frisk. You wouldn’t allow that policy in your neighborhood. You’d say it was unconstitutional.

Also in the past you treated them differently when it came to welfare. Denied poor black women but not whites.

And you defend cops when they wrongfully shoot blacks but not if it was you or someone you love. Then you’d finally admit we don’t need a militarized police department. You wouldn’t tell blacks they are wrong to complain about this.
 
It's a private company. What do you want to do to this private company? Regulate it? Interesting.

Yes it should matter if it's a public or private school. This to me sounds like an argument against private schools. Only you fuckers don't mention it's a private school. You want everyone to assume it's a public school.

Let the market decide. Isn't that what you guys always say? If the parents don't like it they can take their kids out of that school and send them to public school. But keep in mind my public school teacher taught us how to put a condom on too. Because a lot of our stupid parents weren't comfortable talking birds and bees with their kids and too many of our young teens are becoming parents. Wear a fucking condom is a good message. Suck a dick instead of putting it in your pussy is wise advice.
Market decide? If inner city schools who can't even teach basics like writing and math to the idiots attending should be able to tell these same idiots and their offspring that WHITE MAN IS EVIL so attacking him and the popo is all fine and dandy?
 
"They" don't.
White people would find it unconstitutional if cops just ran up on them, cuffed them, searched their pockets then let them go if/when they found nothing.

We know white Republicans wouldn't like this. How? Trump bashed Bloomberg for Stop and Frisk. So you republicans know it's not cool to do. Because the minute you found a Democrat (Bloomberg isn't really a Democrats but he was running as one), you went after him for it. Because you know liberal whites and blacks find it unconstitutional. Now you're defending stop and frisk?

Ah the old bad argument "if you don't have anything illegal in your pocket then you have nothing to worry about". Idiot.
 
That too. Not a problem to me, but then I'm not a low-life criminal like you.
That's because you wipe your white ass with the constitution

 
That too. Not a problem to me, but then I'm not a low-life criminal like you.
This is what I'm talking about when I call you a racist. Even Trump would agree with me you are a racist. Thanks for admitting it.


President Donald Trump slammed billionaire Mike Bloomberg as a "total racist" Tuesday for comments he made defending the New York City Police Department's stop-and-frisk policy — a policy Trump has backed as president.
 
White people would find it unconstitutional if cops just ran up on them, cuffed them, searched their pockets then let them go if/when they found nothing.
......
Anyone who is not a criminal like you would probably have no problem helping the police solve crimes in the area. Reactions would vary by individual not skin color, racist. By the way, using words like "ran up on," and "cuffed" are misleading, obvious and fail to have the effect you were hoping they would have. Don't try to be clever, dumbass.
 
One person who's a consistent supporter of stop and frisk, however, is Trump.

The president hailed the policy while Bloomberg was in office, and he has continued to support it from the White House. In a 2018 speech to the International Association of Police Chiefs, Trump suggested the practice could solve Chicago's crime problem.

"I've told them to work with local authorities to try to change the terrible deal the city of Chicago entered into with ACLU, which ties law enforcement's hands, and to strongly consider stop and frisk," Trump said. "It works, and it was meant for problems like Chicago. It was meant for it, stop and frisk."

In the Oval Office on Friday, Trump was asked if he's still pro-stop-and-frisk.

“I support anything we can do to get down crime on and to get rid of drugs,” he said.

Even if it's unconstitutional.
 
Anyone who is not a criminal like you would probably have no problem helping the police solve crimes in the area. Reactions would vary by individual not skin color, racist. By the way, using words like "ran up on," and "cuffed" are misleading, obvious and fail to have the effect you were hoping they would have. Don't try to be clever, dumbass.
Wrong. People like you who would trade in your freedom for some security deserve neither. Ever hear that teacher boy?
 
Stop and frisk. You wouldn’t allow that policy in your neighborhood. You’d say it was unconstitutional.

Also in the past you treated them differently when it came to welfare. Denied poor black women but not whites.

And you defend cops when they wrongfully shoot blacks but not if it was you or someone you love. Then you’d finally admit we don’t need a militarized police department. You wouldn’t tell blacks they are wrong to complain about this.
Stop and frisk is used on known criminals. I lived in Minneapolis and my parents owned a neighborhood grocery store in the early 60s. Many of our customers were on welfare and over half were Black single mothers. I lived it. You're full of shit.
 
I was stopped by police walking down the street a few times when I was a young man. We talked, they checked my coat, thanked me for my time, and I wished them well finding the man they were looking for. I was happy to voluntarily cooperate with the police because they were working to solve a crime and make the area safer.
 
I say it comes down to the local community and whether or not they pressure their school board on the matter.

One thing the pandemic opened my mind to was home schooling. Now my kids are way past their school years, so I was unaffected. Just want to put that out there that I'm not speaking from experience. But I can now see merit in a small group of parents combining their time and abilities to teach their kids. It gives parents the freedom to decide how to fold any religious beliefs into their daily lessons as they see fit. Local school districts should open up extra-curricular activities to allow these at home kids to participate in sports, music, and other after school activities. Perhaps they do that now, just not sure.
 

Forum List

Back
Top