Mac1958
Diamond Member
I have no use for it from any group, and I say so when it comes up.As long as it's applied evenly, I have no issues. Last summer I heard nothing about domestic terrorists, and yet your definitionAmericans who use violence and intimidation against other Americans towards a political goal.Want to define "domestic terrorist"? Because, the politicians seem to be holding the definitionWe have to protect our President from terrorists, foreign and domestic.Nothing says ‘normal, legitimate election’ like a swearing-in behind 12 feet of razor wire and 25,000 troops that you’re not sure you can trust and silencing all questions about the election.There's a few of these threads now.What a baby...
You people really love the dramatics.
All the paranoia they've displaying is really hitting them now as some kind of real-time apocalypse.
My guess is they'll get back to normal before too long, trying to "own da libz".
Most of us are fine with that, except for the domestic terrorists. Obviously.
awfully close to them.....for now.
In this case, it's directed specifically at our nation's capitol, our elected representatives, and our very election and presidential transition process. I thought most people knew that.
would have applied to them also.
Regardless, this was different from anything the country has seen. And more dangerous.