Can't help but notice the breed of dog was not mentioned. That means they were pit bulls.
I haven't ever noticed that particular pattern, not that I've looked. I immediately assumed pits based on the use of the word, "mauled". I'll have to keep an eye out for how actual mentions of the breed appear or don't. Those sorts of tendencies in modern journalism always fascinate me in the most macabre of ways.
Pit bulls have well funded advocacy groups trying to rehabilitate their image and cast dispersion on the statistical fact that they're far and away the most vicious breed. The press is very PC when it comes to reporting on the breed, it's very similar to the way they defend islam or other groups prone to violence.
Here's an interesting documentary that deals with the subject.
One of the sweetest and most gentle dogs I ever had was a Pit. She was a stray I found on the side of the road. I brought her home and she blended in well with the rest of the pack... an Irish Setter, two German Shepherds, a Chihuahua, a Poodle, and two cats (I was living on a small ranch). When the neighbor's two German short hair pointers came down the hill, there were problems... needless to say, they never came back to 'visit". This was back in the early '80s.
They can be very sweet and gentle, friendly and goofy. Came across one with just that kind of personality in a local pet store recently, I think her owner was shocked I would approach the dog, much less get down and interact with her. He seemed very appreciative that I hadn't judged her just because of her breed.
All that being said, I would not bring one into my home these days unless it was a very young pup. There is just no telling how their former person raised them. I frequently visit the local shelters with a mind to adopt, but, sadly, most of the dogs I see there are Pit Bulls or some mix with a Pit and all are beyond the age I'm willing to bring into the fold.