15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

Status
Not open for further replies.
I can see why zaangalewa thinks his way with Feynman. Mathematics is supposed to give us the truth and proofs, no?

Watch this video on 3x + 1.



I never said I can prove God, but science backs up the Bible and faith plays a HUGE part. This is why I am 100% POSITIVE.

So what Feynman said in his noon time lecture is truth.
 
Last edited:
I'm a grad of Columbia University, and have recently finished a remote course at Yale.

When you completed your work at

Ringling Bros. and Barnum & Bailey Clown College....​


...did they give you a diploma, or just that big red nonse?
And is that where you learned to be a Biblical Literalist/Young Earth Creationist wack job?
Because your Cult defies many areas/disciplines of science, not just biology.
`
 
Last edited:
And is that where you learned to be a Biblical Literalist/Young Earth Creationist wack job?
Because your Cult defies many areas/disciplines of science, not just biology.
`

  1. The Left says of the Right, “You fools, it is demonstrable that dinosaurs lived one hundred million years ago, I can prove it to you, how can you say the earth was created in 4000BCE?” But this supposed intransigence on the part of the Religious Right is far less detrimental to the health of the body politic than the Left’s love affair with Marxism, Socialism, Racialism, the Command Economy, all of which have been proven via one hundred years of evidence shows only shortages, despotism and murder. David Mamet
  2. “…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, or vice versa?” Ben Shapiro
 
No reason to google you. You're a worthless POS.

But RE: what you said... Nice. It's awesome your namesake died under Muhammad. Are you expecting the same of you?
When I first started posting I was a bit of a crusader and posting mainly pro-Israel. Fairly expert on that conflict. (as I did here from 2006 -2012.. and some a bit later.. with this handle).
I figured my earlier yahoo handle 'murdered-by-Islamic-gunmen' was too long (and perhaps offensive), and they called me 'mbig' for short. (another later handle).

Then I loved 'abu afak' second (now turns out, 4th, but most famous) named victim of Big Mo. (First was a female, Asma bint Marwan). Afak started an internet riot when I used it on many Islamic/arab message boards.
I Fully intended it to! :^)
It created a battle of info/history on the net. Many Islamic websites started making up ****.
Wiki didn't know what to do.
First they changed the entry to [current] Islamic apologetics denying the person/history. (I disputed it there)
But ALL we know about a-a, in fact, came from several IsIamic sources. (incl the esteemed Ibn Ishaq's Bio of Mo). There is/was no other history of him.
So finally they changed the Wiki entry back to the approximate truth.

The unvarnished truth is (and was 20 years ago) best presented by (Christian website) Answering-Islam:
MUHAMMAD AND THE MURDER OF ABU AFAK

`
 
Last edited:
james bond PoliticalChic other Fundies.
Let's get my position more fully elaborated.

A Christian Fundamentalist is a Missionary, a Muslim Fundamentalist kills him.

Unfortunately we don't have any Koranic literalists here to straighten out, but I can and have done that too.

`
 
Last edited:
When I first started posting I was a bit of a crusader and posting mainly pro-Israel. Fairly expert on that conflict. (as I did here from 2006 -2012.. and some a bit later.. with this handle).
I figured my earlier yahoo handle 'murdered-by-Islamic-gunmen' was too long (and perhaps offensive), and they called me 'mbig' for short. (another later handle).

Then I loved 'abu afak' second (now turns out, 4th, but most famous) named victim of Big Mo. (First was a female, Asma bint Marwan). Afak started an internet riot when I used it on many Islamic/arab message boards.
I Fully intended it to! :^)
It created a battle of info/history on the net. Many Islamic websites started making up ****.
Wiki didn't know what to do.
First they changed the entry to [current] Islamic apologetics denying the person/history. (I disputed it there)
But ALL we know about a-a, in fact, came from several IsIamic sources. (incl the esteemed Ibn Ishaq's Bio of Mo). There is/was no other history of him.
So finally they changed the Wiki entry back to the approximate truth.

The unvarnished truth is (and was 20 years ago) best presented by (Christian website) Answering-Islam:
MUHAMMAD AND THE MURDER OF ABU AFAK

`
Interesting. Are you against Christianity with the same fervor? If you are, the maybe you're better off in the religion forum as I haven't seen much from you in terms of science.

For example, there are no experiments for evolution that are presented here. If one can make a new species, then artificial breeding should be able to create a new species; Not just natural selection.

Now, if you're going to want a million or billion years BS, then you have no experiment. This is what I get here. Thus, evos have no common ancestor to present nor experimental artificial breeding. I guess one can breed some strange mutations just with natural selection.
 
Interesting. Are you against Christianity with the same fervor? If you are, the maybe you're better off in the religion forum as I haven't seen much from you in terms of science.

For example, there are no experiments for evolution that are presented here. If one can make a new species, then artificial breeding should be able to create a new species; Not just natural selection.

Now, if you're going to want a million or billion years BS, then you have no experiment. This is what I get here. Thus, evos have no common ancestor to present nor experimental artificial breeding. I guess one can breed some strange mutations just with natural selection.
LOL @sshole.
No none has posted more relevant to the topical science than me.
In a landslide.
Of course, you consider the Bible science, and science a religion. :^)
So WTF cares what you think/preach?

The evidence for Evo is Overwhelming, physical, observational, and grows every year with new fossils and every new science of relevance, (DNA, Isotopic dating, etc) which all have helped confirm it.

`
 
I can see why zaangalewa thinks his way with Feynman. Mathematics is supposed to give us the truth and proofs, no?

Watch this video on 3x + 1.



I never said I can prove God, but science backs up the Bible and faith plays a HUGE part. This is why I am 100% POSITIVE.

So what Feynman said in his noon time lecture is truth.

Science 'backs up' nothing in the Bible.
 
LOL @sshole.
No none has posted more relevant to the topical science than me.
In a landslide.
Of course, you consider the Bible science, and science a religion. :^)
So WTF cares what you think/preach?

The evidence for Evo is Overwhelming, physical, observational, and grows every year with new fossils and every new science of relevance, (DNA, Isotopic dating, etc) which all have helped confirm it.

`
That's what you claim, but why don't you post a link to the evidence or experiment so I can look at it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top