Wow, the sheer fucking arrogance of some of these claims is awe inspiring.
It's because I'm a master. Do you want me to be humble when I am a master? Lol. Forget it!
If I'm resting on the beach and my twin brother is in an airplane, we're not both moving at the same speed, regardless of the motion of the Earth, the solar system, the galaxy, or the velocity of the universe's expansion. I, by sitting on the beach, am moving at precisely whatever speed the earth is spiraling through space. My brother is moving at that speed ADJUSTED by the speed of the aircraft, which is not stationary in relation to the Earth, as I am. Therefore, our total velocity will be different, even if that difference is only a tiny, tiny fraction of the velocity of the Earth itself.
Your mind is so narrow.
You say "time dilates because the speed of objects", but having that both are traveling at 29km/s around the sun, no matter how fast your brother travels in the airplane, both of you are traveling at the same speed anyway.
It should be a different scenario if your brother travels at greater speed than 29km/s, and even so, our solar system travels at 250km/s in the galaxy, so whatever is inside our solar system that is their speed. But wait, our galaxy moves at 630km/s. FRom here, if you believe that crap of flowing time, then time flows the same inside the total galaxy, and no matter how fast you travel inside of it, time won't dilate as long as you don't travel faster than 630km/s.
So, this is to demonstrate you that such idea of Einstein is nothing but crap to the square.
If we were talking about this experiment with various time keeping instruments happening once or twice and the results coinciding with what we'd expect if relativity were correct, then I'd say that you're probably correct in calling it a chance malfunction.
Yes, use my Rolex and check its time data after two years in outer space. You will see that the malfunction of my Rolex will be way different than the malfunction of the atomic clock in the satellite.
Use a sand clock in the spaceship and all your crap is over in one dilated second... ha ha ha ha...
I'm a master.
The fact that such experiments have been replicated many times and the specific differences in the clocks that were in motion,
I just poster "variables" using different kind of clocks to check if your crap is true, but you know that the other clocks will definitively give you other results other than the distorted result of the atomic clock in space.
I m a master, I know.
All your test have zero value when you never tried using variables, which are the test of fire to verify the results of the atomic clock data.
when compared to the clocks that weren't, have tended map out over what one would expect if relativity were mathematically sound, suggests that you SIMPLY ASSERTING OFF THE TOP OF YOUR HEAD that this is "definitively" the result of a malfunction is probably not reliable enough counter-evidence to call Einstein's theory of relativity debunked.
Relativity is a debunked theory. Time doesn't exist, by consequence, time can't dilate.
I'm a master.
Next, and again, you SIMPLY ASSERTING that gravitational lensing isn't a thing , and claiming that it's the sun's "hot atmosphere" creating the optical illusion doesn't debunk shit. I'm not sure where you've gotten the idea that your mere claims and whatever counter-explanations you could dream up count as scientific evidence, but that shit's silly as fuck.
I will respond to your silly argument with a graphic of mine, because I'm a master.
You wanna say that you don't believe this shit, that I'm an idiot for finding it even remotely compelling, that's your prerogative, but please do get it through your head that expressing your contradictory opinions isn't the same as disproving scientific theories.
Your scientific theories are crap. You won't be able to discredit a single line, letter, word of my graphic.
Do you know why?
Because I'm a master.
Next up, are you seriously telling me that the NASA article I posted is lying about Einstein's theory to give him credit for something that YOU actually theorized? Holy shit, even by internet bullshit standards, that is one HELL of a claim!
Idiot Einstein believed that gravity was caused by density of bodies, that's all he believed. Read his writings.
Even the stupidity of black holes was invented with that silly idea.
NASA is full of crap as well, when they also believe that they can see the universe as it was it is past... that is also laughable.
But don't worry about it, just follow my advice, go back to your school, demand your money back because your teachers taught you crap instead of physics.
I will teach you science based on reality. With me you finally will learn how the universe works.
Because... I'm a master.
I'm honestly starting to wonder if your entire reply is just an elaborate troll. In the first place, you're expecting me to believe that you're a top scientist who's work is right there at the bleeding edge of theoretical physics, yet you've illustrated that you don't quite grasp the concept of relative velocity and you have demonstrated ZERO understanding of replicable results.
I didn't say that, but you can believe whatever you want.
That's already goofy as fuck, but then telling me that NASA is giving Einstein YOUR credit!? Just. . . wow. I'll bet you stepped out of the shuttle before Armstrong, too, right? Fuckin NASA. It ain't right what they've done to you.
Yes, it is MY credit, Silly Albert never ever mentioned any spinning of bodies related to gravity, he only related spinning to time dilatation. He was a loony and his theories were always good for nothing.
"Since nothing is "stationary" in the universe, then your theory is 100% invalid." This is a good example of your lack of fundamental understanding. Yes, everything in the universe is moving. No, it isn't all moving at the same speed. According to relativity theory, the difference in how time flows at different velocities isn't a binary; there isn't one speed at which time flows in motion and one speed at which it flows when stationary.
So you agree with nothing in the universe is stationary.But later you claim time flows at different velocities.
Ok, now show me how you have detected those velocities of time. Remember that you can't use clocks because clocks are devices calibrated to solely make tic tic tic tic... Clocks can't detect any flowing time and perceive its "flowing".
Houston, a guy here has a problem....
Sheesss, I'm truly a master.
Rather, the rate of time's progress changes with velocity. Therefore, the fact that nothing is stationary is irrelevant. The differences can, according to all sorts of available literature and recorded experimentation, be observed by observing movement at different velocities.
You and your "irrelevant" are going nowhere.
You talk of of available literature. Sure, pure crap theories. Face it, Einstein wasn't a genius but an idiot.
You say "recorded experimentation"m but you never used variables. Your experiments are all invalid if not incomplete.
You say, being observed by observing movement at different velocities. OK, light travels faster than you, so what?
You compete with light going to the Moon. A beam of light is sent to the Moon while you take a Uber spaceship going over there. At the time you have reached the Moon, the light has arrived already, part of it reflected on the surface and gone, another part absorbed. You can't even find where light hit on the Moon. Then, so what?
Reality is that such is all that will happen. Nothing more. Light traveled faster than you and that's all. No dilatation of time, no warping of space, no expansion of the universe, just you arriving way after light to the moon.
All your theories about relativity, and time dilatation are crap.
You better go back to your school, and do it before those fraudulent teachers retire and go away with your money. They have pulled your legs.
You're right, though, I don't have an explanation as to the mechanism by which time dilates. I never claimed to be an expert. In fact, when I started this conversation by saying that time SEEMS to exist, I didn't even claim to have a confident belief in relativity theory.
Look, a theory of science is not about predictions but EXPLANATIONS. Predictions are only the assumption of what could be the result in an experiment.
How it comes that relativity was accepted as a theory of science when Einstein never explained sh*t, such is a question to be answered by the idiots who follow that fantasy.
Lets say, you make your theory of the Sun orbiting around earth, and the mechanism is asked for you to explain how the sun travels from horizon to horizon. You can do like Ptolemy, and use mathematics alone, but such IS NOT an explanation. His calculations are very good, but the theory itself is crap.
You have with relativity the same scenario, pure abstract mathematics but zero explanation, zero facts.
I can guarantee you what I say because I'm a master.
From everything I've read, there have been some tweeks and updates, but by and large the experimental evidence thus far has largely confirmed the theory's pillars. I only put up those links to show you that time dilation experiments aren't just some random shit I dreamed up to try and convince you of a random physics theory.
You did good in discussing this topic with me. Hope you get deeper in those deluded theories but ask questions rather than getting impressed with their computer simulations and attractive pictures, which are just that, entertainment.
Demand the evidence that time really exists and flows. Tell them to show you the instruments used to measure the flowing of time. Remember, nothing else but the flowing of time. You will find out the whole theory is crappy without evidence supporting it.
I can tell because I'm a master.
Here's the fun thing, though. I don't need to be an expert in physics to see through you. I don't have to have a PHD in SHIT to know that a guy who claims that, because the Earth is moving, a man sitting on the beach is moving at precisely the same speed as a man in an airplane, ALSO isn't an expert of any sort, let alone a man who's theories are misattributed to Einstein.
The example given to you was to demonstrate that if time "dilates" then the greater speed is what rules for it, and having the speed of earth as greater than yours and your brother's, then both of you should be experienced the same dilatation of time. The satellites travel in conjunction with earth at 29km/s around the sun, then, any difference between time data in atomic clocks is caused because one of the clocks suffers malfunction.
The atomic clocks are calibrated on ground zero. When exposed to a different environment, their calibration will suffer changes. This is a fact with everything you send to outer space. There are thousands of experiments of all kind performed in the space station, all of them prove and support my statements, all of them show changes without exception. Like mixing liquid metals that can't be mix on earth, or mixing water with cooking oil. You go to that space station and your heart becomes a circumference, and when you return part of your DNA has changed.
You have learned wrong science in the past, and here you are learning good and verifiable science.
A MASTER!? LMFAO! Nah, I'm not gonna go bother my old school teachers, and I'm certainly not going to come to you to learn anything. You, sir, are not only comically stupid for someone so utterly convinced of his own genius, but also cartoonishly full of shit.
A master?
What are you talking about?
Are you saying I said I'm a master?!
Where? When?
I''m just a dude like you who is discussing science at a layman forum level.
Come on, you are confusing me with another guy...
