14% of Economist Say Trump Would Be The Best For The Economy

[Al Azar]

LOL!!

So you think every time the Clintons have 400 XXXXXX "experts" who support whatever harm the Clintons intend to do, that those are really honest, patriotic, and competent people, not just partisan hacks on the taxpayer dole???


The better question, and hopefully someone will ask it...

of those "500 economists," how many got FEDERAL GRANT MONEY in the past decade???

How many were wrong?

 

[daws101]

LOL!!

So you think every time the Clintons have 400 XXXXXX "experts" who support whatever harm the Clintons intend to do, that those are really honest, patriotic, and competent people, not just partisan hacks on the taxpayer dole???


The better question, and hopefully someone will ask it...

of those "500 economists," how many got FEDERAL GRANT MONEY in the past decade???

still no evidence, just more ass talking.

 

[Dragonlady]

if you are supporting trump you are .

What law did Trump break?

here's just one for starters
Donald Trump’s Modeling Agency Broke Immigration Laws, Attorneys Say

No charges, no convictions. An attorney can say anything he likes about Trump. That proves exactly nothing.

that just means he was not caught and say nothing about his obvious criminality.
since you have a hard on for him, nothing he says or does would be considered criminal by you .

Right, and Slick Willy wasn't caught molesting children, but we all know he's guilty as hell.

Who is "we all". Would that be the voices in your head? Because no one has ever before suggested Bill Clinton molested children, and to say so without evidence is called "libel".

 

[LaDexter]

after an earlier Republican administration wrecked our economy.

by spending spending spending and more spending, increasing spending faster than LBJ did....

Pretty funny. Bill Clinton had a great economy because the policies enacted while he was Prez were straight from Milton Friedman. George W Bush wrecked the economy by spending like a left wing Democrat, from socializing senior drugs to making a trillion dollars vanish in the left wing public school bureaucracy...

Indeed, Obama is part of the W legacy. If W had been anything but a big spending traitor, O never gets near the WH...

 

[LaDexter]

still no evidence, just more ass talking.

Are you suggesting Hillary is an honest person running an honest campaign?

I'm not sure if you are just very naive or incredibly partisan...

 

[daws101]

What law did Trump break?

here's just one for starters
Donald Trump’s Modeling Agency Broke Immigration Laws, Attorneys Say

No charges, no convictions. An attorney can say anything he likes about Trump. That proves exactly nothing.

that just means he was not caught and say nothing about his obvious criminality.
since you have a hard on for him, nothing he says or does would be considered criminal by you .

Right, and Slick Willy wasn't caught molesting children, but we all know he's guilty as hell.

Who is "we all". Would that be the voices in your head? Because no one has ever before suggested Bill Clinton molested children, and to say so without evidence is called "libel".

we all is a fallacy it's called argumentum ad populum .

 

[daws101]

still no evidence, just more ass talking.

Are you suggesting Hillary is an honest person running an honest campaign?

I'm not sure if you are just very naive or incredibly partisan...

still dodging the part where you need to present evidence to back up your shit otherwise you are talking out your ass ,

 

[LaDexter]

To "back up my claim" would require a court ordered "hearing." These taxpayer funded leeches disguised as "economists" are not going to come forward and admit they got money from both Uncle Sam and Clinton Foundation.

But it is nice to see that the tone and language of the Clinton campaign workers like yourself have not changed... one unprovoked four letter word after another. That's one of the reasons why Hillary doesn't do press conferences - she uses four letter words like you do...

 

[daws101]

To "back up my claim" would require a court ordered "hearing." These taxpayer funded leeches disguised as "economists" are not going to come forward and admit they got money from both Uncle Sam and Clinton Foundation.

But it is nice to see that the tone and language of the Clinton campaign workers like yourself have not changed... one unprovoked four letter word after another. That's one of the reasons why Hillary doesn't do press conferences - she uses four letter words like you do...

translation: you got nothing so talking out your ass is your substitute for actual information ,
getting the vapors over language is a ***** poster problem.

 

[LaDexter]

LOL!!!

Do you talk directly to Hillary as one of her campaign workers, or are you just too far down the line???

 

[daws101]

LOL!!!

Do you talk directly to Hillary as one of her campaign workers, or are you just too far down the line???

false assumption is also a ***** poster problem.

 

[Al Azar]

LOL!!

So you think every time the Clintons have 400 XXXXXX "experts" who support whatever harm the Clintons intend to do, that those are really honest, patriotic, and competent people, not just partisan hacks on the taxpayer dole???


The better question, and hopefully someone will ask it...

of those "500 economists," how many got FEDERAL GRANT MONEY in the past decade???

How many were wrong?

Speaking of economists who got it all wrong, have you been following Bush's economic advisers since the the great job they did for the previous administration? Are they teaching anywhere, or have they just gone back to school to learn what they obviously missed the first time around?

 

[LaDexter]

daws, let's just examine the cattle futures, because the comparison is accurate...

Here we had Hillary telling us she was an outstanding cattle futures trader, who made an astronomical profit in cattle futures.

If someone suggested Hillary was full of @@@@ and crooked, you'd have responded the same way, saying PROVE IT and then a flurry of four letter words.

Then "expert" Hillary added that she had spotted an uptrend in cattle prices....

except there was a problem. Her most profitable trades and the majority of her profitable trades were SHORTS or bets the price would go DOWN (which it DID), proving Hillary LIED and had NO CLUE WHAT THE PRICE WAS DOING DURING THE TIME OF THE TRADES.

Still, you insist PROVE IT and another barrage of four letter words...

Then the trading firm got shut down for SWITCHING, which is going long and short the same thing, and then allocating the winning and losing trades AFTER the trades, not before. Tyson Foods got all of the "reverse losses" of Hillary's "gains..."

a tax deductible bribe to Hillary.

 

[Al Azar]

daws, let's just examine the cattle futures, because the comparison is accurate...

Here we had Hillary telling us she was an outstanding cattle futures trader, who made an astronomical profit in cattle futures.

If someone suggested Hillary was full of @@@@ and crooked, you'd have responded the same way, saying PROVE IT and then a flurry of four letter words.

Then "expert" Hillary added that she had spotted an uptrend in cattle prices....

except there was a problem. Her most profitable trades and the majority of her profitable trades were SHORTS or bets the price would go DOWN (which it DID), proving Hillary LIED and had NO CLUE WHAT THE PRICE WAS DOING DURING THE TIME OF THE TRADES.

Still, you insist PROVE IT and another barrage of four letter words...

Then the trading firm got shut down for SWITCHING, which is going long and short the same thing, and then allocating the winning and losing trades AFTER the trades, not before. Tyson Foods got all of the "reverse losses" of Hillary's "gains..."

a tax deductible bribe to Hillary.

Why do you make stuff up?

In fact, she was the worst kind of trader. She was nervous. At one point during this adventure she was $100,000 the red and a nervous wreck. Her margin wasn't called and she was persuaded to hang in there and when the market flipped, she got out with a respectable profit.

And never traded again. Ever. She learned her lesson.

 

[LaDexter]

LOL!!!


This idiot actually believes Hillary made a zillion dollars in cattle futures trading, and then never did it again...


LOL!!!

The Clinton Scandal That Still Matters Is Not the One You Think

"o it is possible to link Tyson’s support for the Clintons to water contamination, an ironic circumstance given Hillary Clinton’s criticism of Governor Rick Snyder’s handling of the Flint water crisis.

The Times also reported, “During Mr. Clinton's tenure in Arkansas, Tyson benefited from a variety of state actions, including $9 million in government loans, the placement of company executives on important state boards and favorable decisions on environmental issues.”

Tyson appears to have obtained these results for what looks like a bribe delivered though Hillary Clinton’s commodities account. To quote the company’s former chairman: politics is “a series of unsentimental transactions between those who need votes and those who have money.”"
l

 

[Treeshepherd]

So 86% of economists are globalists

do you think a global economy might have something to do with that?
not the dumbest thing I've read today but it's early yet.

Obviously. Globalism is the status quo. Hillary is the status quo candidate. Rhetoric that rails against the status quo (ie Trump and Sanders) isn't going to garner favor with a majority of economists (who don't actually produce goods and tend to benefit from the rapid expansion of the finance sector of our economy in relation to other sectors).

 

[LaDexter]

Globalism /trade deals....


the issue is COST. We need to get our COSTS DOWN if we are to compete. What COST needs to come down?

The cost of GOVERNMENT and the LEGAL PROFESSION

the two leeches who have made off like bandits during the period of American WO (W + O).

 

[Treeshepherd]

So 86% of economists are globalists

Probably. Globalization is just competition in big letters, and most economists think competition is a good thing.

Competition with workers in other countries who make 30 cents an hour is not 'good' for American wages. It is good, however, for multi-national corporations who sell stuff to Americans and also 'good' for consumer prices. Pros and cons.

 

[bripat9643]

What law did Trump break?

here's just one for starters
Donald Trump’s Modeling Agency Broke Immigration Laws, Attorneys Say

No charges, no convictions. An attorney can say anything he likes about Trump. That proves exactly nothing.

that just means he was not caught and say nothing about his obvious criminality.
since you have a hard on for him, nothing he says or does would be considered criminal by you .

Right, and Slick Willy wasn't caught molesting children, but we all know he's guilty as hell.

Who is "we all". Would that be the voices in your head? Because no one has ever before suggested Bill Clinton molested children, and to say so without evidence is called "libel".

Actually, people have suggested it. He took a large number of plane rides on the "Lolita Express" to Orgy Island where under age prostitutes were on the menu.

You can say pretty much anything you want about politicians without being sued for libel. Just look at what's been said about Donald Trump.

 

[LaDexter]

Whether you like it or not, that's the reality.

Better get our costs DOWN if we want a chance to compete with the same issues, just like we did in the 1990s when government spending was 25% of GDP or about half of what it has grown to under the period of American WO