14% of Economist Say Trump Would Be The Best For The Economy

[daws101]

You calling anybody a douche bag is hilarious.

How so? I'm not the one defending a criminal. You are.

if you are supporting trump you are .

What law did Trump break?

here's just one for starters
Donald Trump’s Modeling Agency Broke Immigration Laws, Attorneys Say

No charges, no convictions. An attorney can say anything he likes about Trump. That proves exactly nothing.

that just means he was not caught and say nothing about his obvious criminality.
since you have a hard on for him, nothing he says or does would be considered criminal by you .

 

[bripat9643]

They aren't economists. They are douche bag propagandists paid to come up with economic justifications for crony capitalism.

what makes you think they are propagandists?

is it because they are educated experts that disagree with your uneducated, unexpert opinion?

No, it's because they say things that are obviously untrue, such as the claim that tax increases help the economy, and that government can create jobs.

where do you see those statements (and they aren't necessarily untrue, btw)

If they endorse Hillary, that's what they believe because that's her economic program.

sure.
and they are wrong to believe that clinton will be best for the economy because....

Her program is to raise taxes and have government "create jobs" with big spending programs. There is no valid economic theory that says that will work. Taking water out of one end of the bath tub and pouring it into the other end doesn't raise the level of water in the bath tub.

 

[bripat9643]

How so? I'm not the one defending a criminal. You are.

if you are supporting trump you are .

What law did Trump break?

here's just one for starters
Donald Trump’s Modeling Agency Broke Immigration Laws, Attorneys Say

No charges, no convictions. An attorney can say anything he likes about Trump. That proves exactly nothing.

that just means he was not caught and say nothing about his obvious criminality.
since you have a hard on for him, nothing he says or does would be considered criminal by you .

Right, and Slick Willy wasn't caught molesting children, but we all know he's guilty as hell.

 

[Al Azar]

Bill Clinton did a lot of this type of nonsense too. There were always "500 economists" who supported raising taxes etc.

.

Is that the same Bill Clinton who raised taxes and balanced the budget?

 

[LaDexter]

Her program is to raise taxes and have government "create jobs" with big spending programs. There is no valid economic theory that says that will work.

True, but there are zillions of taxpayer funded liars who will say whatever their "masters" tell them to...

 

[ogibillm]

what makes you think they are propagandists?

is it because they are educated experts that disagree with your uneducated, unexpert opinion?

No, it's because they say things that are obviously untrue, such as the claim that tax increases help the economy, and that government can create jobs.

where do you see those statements (and they aren't necessarily untrue, btw)

If they endorse Hillary, that's what they believe because that's her economic program.

sure.
and they are wrong to believe that clinton will be best for the economy because....

Her program is to raise taxes and have government "create jobs" with big spending programs. There is no valid economic theory that says that will work. Taking water out of one end of the bath tub and pouring it into the other end doesn't raise the level of water in the bath tub.

where do you get your expertise?

 

[daws101]

Both parties want Big Government. The Republicans want government to protect Big Business and oppress people and lifestyles they don't like, and the Democrats want Big Government to protect consumers and establish a tax scale that places the larger burden on those who can most easily accommodate it.

Establishment Republicans may want it, but that's why they were shown the door in this election. Rank and file Republicans don't want big government. They want government cut down to size.

The primaries are not the general election.
Your guy is getting his ass handed to him,
Your rank a file bullshit is a myth you and your imaginary friends tell themselves.

Trump is the nominee, so that pretty much shows what the rank and file think of establishment Republicans. Whether he wins or loses, no establishment Republican will ever win the nomination again.

you're having that dream again.
all republicans and democrats etc. are establishment (a group in a society exercising power and influence over matters of policy or taste, and seen as resisting change.)
you are just as much part of the establishment as any politician you could name.
all the bitching and denial won't change that.

You don't get to have your own personal idiosynchratic definition of "establishment."

Blow it out your ass, douche bag.

that's not my definition of establishment it's the definition .

try using words you actually know .

id·i·o·syn·crat·ic
[ˌidēəsiNGˈkradik]
ADJECTIVE

1. of or relating to idiosyncrasy; peculiar or individual:

the above is not one of them.

 

[LaDexter]

Is that the same Bill Clinton who raised taxes and balanced the budget?

The most hilarious thing about the "Clinton economy" is that it had absolutely nothing to do with the stated agenda of Bill Clinton. The first two years were about SOCIALIZING HEALTH CARE completely. That failed in Congress late 1994, and then the GOP took over. That is when Bill got four straight budgets with tax and spending CUTS, and Bill HATED EVERY ONE, but signed them, and now takes credit for them, even as the actual budgets did exactly the opposite of what Democrats do - raise taxes, spend/steal until the money is gone...

 

[daws101]

No, it's because they say things that are obviously untrue, such as the claim that tax increases help the economy, and that government can create jobs.

where do you see those statements (and they aren't necessarily untrue, btw)

If they endorse Hillary, that's what they believe because that's her economic program.

sure.
and they are wrong to believe that clinton will be best for the economy because....

Her program is to raise taxes and have government "create jobs" with big spending programs. There is no valid economic theory that says that will work. Taking water out of one end of the bath tub and pouring it into the other end doesn't raise the level of water in the bath tub.

where do you get your expertise?

his ass where else.

 

[Al Azar]

What law did Trump break?

That would take some research. He's been sued 1,900 times, so he may have a problem adhering to contracts he makes. If he went into any of them with the intention of not abiding by the terms, that's fraud.

Speaking of fraud, another trial for fraud, a big one, is coming up in November. So stay tuned.

 

[Al Azar]

No charges, no convictions. An attorney can say anything he likes about Trump. That proves exactly nothing.

Oh, Trump. From the way your post started out, I though you were reminding us about Hillary.

 

[Treeshepherd]

So 86% of economists are globalists

 

[Al Azar]

Taking over 1/6 of the economy is big government.

That sounds almost socialistic. Where did that happen, and when, and what role did Trump play in that?

Read up on something called "Obamacare."

Regulating an industry is not taking over that industry. Name one industry that isn't regulated in this capitalist society of ours.

 

[LaDexter]

No, but 70% may get Federal government grants to "study" things like

when Democrats take taxpayer money and steal it, is that good for America?

If they answer YES

they get another grant to keep studying...

 

[Al Azar]

So 86% of economists are globalists

Probably. Globalization is just competition in big letters, and most economists think competition is a good thing.

 

[daws101]

So 86% of economists are globalists

do you think a global economy might have something to do with that?
not the dumbest thing I've read today but it's early yet.

 

[daws101]

No, but 70% may get Federal government grants to "study" things like

when Democrats take taxpayer money and steal it, is that good for America?

If they answer YES

they get another grant to keep studying...

another non evidenced claim..

 

[Al Azar]

Her program is to raise taxes and have government "create jobs" with big spending programs. There is no valid economic theory that says that will work. Taking water out of one end of the bath tub and pouring it into the other end doesn't raise the level of water in the bath tub.

It only matters that it does work. The Civilian Conservation Corps did wonders after an earlier Republican administration wrecked our economy.

 

[Dragonlady]

Her program is to raise taxes and have government "create jobs" with big spending programs. There is no valid economic theory that says that will work. Taking water out of one end of the bath tub and pouring it into the other end doesn't raise the level of water in the bath tub.

Where does she say this? She says that the country needs infrastructure spending, which it does. Bridges, roads, and highways are crumbing and the Chamber of Commerce says the crumbling infrastructure is affecting America's ability to compete.

Instead of blowing shit up in foreign countries, spend the money at home rebuilding your own country. It creates jobs, helps business, and keeps American tax dollars at home.

 

[LaDexter]

LOL!!

So you think every time the Clintons have 400 XXXXXX "experts" who support whatever harm the Clintons intend to do, that those are really honest, patriotic, and competent people, not just partisan hacks on the taxpayer dole???


The better question, and hopefully someone will ask it...

of those "500 economists," how many got FEDERAL GRANT MONEY in the past decade???