IsaacNewton
Gold Member
- Jun 20, 2015
- 17,308
- 3,698
- 290
Indeed, the power to convict should not be the same power that can accuse.Yes. It is there to curb the power of the state.Magna Carta ?I actually enjoyed it. It is a lot like you see on tv or in movies. After the verdict a few of us stayed behind to talk with both lawyers and have them ask us questions which I've never seen before. The defense told me that he asked the judge to remove me after some comments I made in the courtroom to clarify something someone else had said on the jury. I was like "what do you want, we aren't pros here most of us have never done this".
I recommend to anyone to do it at least once.
I do not support Trial By Jury for the below reason you give:
"I was like "what do you want, we aren't pros here most of us have never done this".
All trials should be by Judicial Panel comprised of legal professionals and not lay persons who have no education or training in legal situations.
I'm sorry I am not that up on a lot of the Magna Carta, are you saying that it ensures Trial By Jury or what?
Virtually all of our local judges are former prosecutors. There is a separation of powers but not a separation of attitude.
Odd isn't it. The very people that should never be given power over others are given power over others lives.