This is a piss poor attempt on your part, duck. But, I guess I've come to expect as much from you. Ten people are dead, the perpetrators are still at large. That pretty much shoots holes in that argument. The could have killed as many people as they wanted in either case. Try again moron. I really should be sending you an invoice for the education that I provide for you.
Also if someone was there with a gun, then these two character's from hell wouldn't still be at large because they'd be dead. This would have also saved possibly who knows how many more if these two weren't still at large. The Canadians are a bunch of idiot's, and the families of these fallen victims ought to sue the government over the loss of their loved one's live's.
What argument are you referring to? I'm agreeing with you on the fact that ten are dead.
I suppose that's possible, but we can't be sure they wanted to kill more than ten. It must have been much more time consuming and dangerous for the killers than just opening up with an AR and spraying bullets in all directions! We certainly don't want that happening in Canada.
There's no reason why you should be angry. If anything you could be finding pleasure in innocent people being murdered, regardless of them using knives is less satisfying.
You will have to be specific with an itemized invoice. I wouldn't say that I haven't learned something from you. That's the reason why we have our conversations!
obesity kills many more than guns or knives...time to outlaw food people
So why did you try to deflect that they might have killed "hundreds?" You're slipping duck. Are you suffering dementia at such a young age?
What makes you think I'm angry? If anything, I'm amused at your idiotic attempts to explain away your inept argument against inanimate guns. The mass killing argument just bit the dust.
Sure, you can go back to school and study math, geography, history, current events and logic to begin with. Then I could engage in intelligent conversation instead of answering another troll.
If there were guns involved, there's little doubt that there would be more dead. However, we can't say that the two bad guys would be among the dead.
Are you suggesting that Canadians are idiots because they want to limit the type of guns they allow?
How old do you think I am?
Inanimate knives please, if you will?
You're not making it clear which mass killing you're talking about. Could you explain which and then explain the dust biting?
I hope you aren't threatening that you're not going to talk to me anymore. That would be the cruelest cut of all!
That's a big word duck. IF you had a brain, we wouldn't be having this conversation. The fact remains that even with strict gun control, Canada has experienced a mass killing. IF a person wants to kill multiple people, they will find a way--gun control or no gun control. The difference is whether or not the potential victims can defend themselves or not.
No idea, and I was being kind. It is evident that you are either young and stupid or old and demented. The latter, I can excuse.
Please refer to the previous answer ^^^.
I think you're trying to be kind but there are other issues that are interfering to make kindness impossible.
Correction. YOU'RE not making any progress here, duck.
What makes you think you have any effect on my mood? I would have to care if you lived or died to make that thought relevant and I don't.
HaHaHa, and deny this mirth? Not on your life duck. Hit the bricks if you don't like having your ass handed to you---AGAIN.
Typical liberal leftist tripe not worth responding too, but ohhhh man I'm going too as soon as I get the time.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
