That's because of the far different definitions the left uses for lies for Trump and Obama.
Obama: You can keep your doctor.
Truth: Millions lost their doctors. Liberals said this was not a lie.
Obama: Your premiums will go down by 2500 a year.
Truth: Millions saw premium increases. Liberals: Since it went down for like 4 people in the USA, HE DID NOT LIE.
Trump: Over 4 million jobs created since I took office!
Truth: 3.8 million jobs created since he took office. Liberals: TRUMP LIED!!!
Yea, so I'm surprised we have a single Obama lie that the left has not tried to twist and obfuscate into oblivion.
Actually what he said was "what we said was, you can keep (your plan) if it hasn’t changed since the law passed" — is available
here.
And we can't stop Republican doctors from not helping the poor who have government insurance. There are doctors who won't work with medicare or medicaid patients too. What do you want us to do about it?
And I don't care for your right wing facts and logic.
What’s baffling is that talking heads on either side of the political aisle seem to have not only divergent opinions, but a completely different set of facts. That’s particularly true regarding the ACA’s impact on healthcare costs. Proponents argue that the bill is doing precisely what it promised to do: holding down the rate of
spending on medical services. But many opponents of the law on the political right are fuming over sky-high premiums.
Which side is closer to the truth? Figuring that out means going to the most reliable sources we have, not the political partisans intent on spinning the data in their favor. That’s precisely what we set out to do here.
All the facts are here but you'd rather spin lies and half truths.
You're lying he EMPHATICALLY stated the "IF you like your plan you can keep it". I detest liars like you.
And I detest liars like you. First of all, most people did keep their doctors. We can't help it if some doctors retired or decided not to take Obamacare patients.
ANd who gives a ****. Do you care if you see your doctor specifically? No one does. I'll see any doctor that accepts my insurance. It's not like your doctor is great or something. There are lots of doctors in your network. Pick another one stupid.
Look, no WMD's
That's a big bold face lie. No spinning this lie.
LOL, how many plans got cancelled because of the ACA? Bush is all you've got? He's a dunce and like his father quite evil.
I know this is going to go over your head because it's more than 3 words (Lock Her Up) or (Build the Wall) but here goes. I'll try to explain the error in your thinking
News reports focused on consumer discontent over “cancellation” notices of health insurance policies that did not meet the new minimum standards under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), but it’s difficult to determine exactly how many consumers were affected. Starting in 2014, most non-group health insurance plans and small employer group plans must offer a minimum set of benefits and consumer protections—for example, plans must not exclude coverage of pre-existing conditions and must offer minimal coverage of certain health benefits such as prescription drugs.
Prior to reform, the nongroup health insurance market suffered from a number of shortcomings, such as benefit exclusions, denials of coverage, premiums that varied greatly by health status, benefit limits, high cost sharing, and lack of information on plan benefits and design prior to purchase. The new minimum benefit standards and consumer protections work together with additional insurance market provisions that took effect in 2010, expansions of Medicaid eligibility, and income-based subsidies in the new health insurance Marketplaces. Together, these new reforms expanded coverage options for millions of people, and raised minimum benefits and consumer protections for millions more.
https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20140303.037517/full/
Among nongroup plans offered in 2013 that were not compliant with ACA standards, some were amended, some were cancelled, and some were granted “grandfathered” status and are not required to comply with the new rules if enrollees were holding the policy continuously before and since the passage of the ACA and insurers did not substantially change benefits or costs. Some insurers, however, chose to cancel policies that would otherwise have been legally grandfathered for business reasons, such as low enrollment or an enrollee group with high average cost, leading to unsustainable premiums. In fact, the non-group market has historically been highly volatile, with just
17 percent retaining coverage for more than two years.
Some of the distress over policy cancellations was related to the fact that healthcare.gov and some of the state-based Marketplaces were not working well enough to ensure that people whose policies were cancelled could easily enroll in an alternative. In response to consumer complaints and associated media coverage, new transitional federal guidance was announced in November 2013, allowing renewals of plans cancelled due to noncompliance.
More than half of states used this guidance to do so.
The new policy development made estimating the share of enrollees affected by the cancellations even more difficult, and comprehensive estimates have not been available. The
Associated Press reported that millions of cancellation notices for existing nongroup market plans had been sent in 32 states and the District of Columbia, but this estimate has several major limitations.
First, the methodology used to collect and verify the data was not specified, nor were the methods used to determine whether a state was included or excluded from the estimate. The
Washington State Insurance Commissioner recently criticized as “inaccurate” the statement that 290,000 people in the state had their individual policies canceled.
Second, the number of cancellations reported may include cancellations of both comprehensive health insurance and limited benefit plans. However, limited benefit plans, such as “cancer only” plans, are not an alternative to comprehensive health insurance and should not be included in the estimate.
Thus, the extent of policy cancellations due to non-ACA-compliance is largely unknown, and the extent of the disruption is hard to assess, even as the Obama administration
considers allowing individuals to keep non-ACA-compliant plans for up to three years.
