Considering the past G20 and WTO conferences have seen the anarcho people crash the party he should have been ready for it. For Chirst sakes they managed to burn several police cars. When you burn cop's cars they tend to get cranky, and rightly so.
95% percent of the people there probably have peaceful intentions. The other 5% should be expected and cause all the problems. That the police have to react to it is expected.
That's precisely the thing. What caught him offguard, from what I gather, is that he was actively
avoiding the trouble makers. He got picked out of a crowd that wasn't doing anything violent because he just kinda looked like an anarchist, and the police totally disregarded the fact he had obvious media identification and equipment.
So yeah, ok. This isn't Iran or South Africa or China. It's not a 1960s Civil Rights march. But I mean,
relatively speaking for a Canadian, it IS unfair treatment by the police. Just because it's not nearly as bad as it used to be, or is in other countries, doesn't mean that someone just doesn't get the right to complain. Hopefully there will be a time when this sort of shit isn't necessary, both because some protesters won't do really stupid shit and because they police will have the ability to only punish and single out those who do. It's not an unrealistic thought, considering that it USED to be much worse worse, and it is worse in other places (places where it used to be EVEN worse). This means there has been progress. What makes one think that it should stop there or that we've reached the apex of proper police-protester relations?