Recent content by SSDD

Saved the planet from what? The amount of CO2 in the air has not decreased...this fact puts the lie to the claim that humans are responsible for the increase in atmospheric CO2. The amount of CO2 that we are producing has decreased dramatically but has had no significant effect on the total...

And exactly how does sunshine start them in an unmovable location time after time?

the air is cleaner, but the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere hasn’t changed...this puts the lie to the claims that man is responsible for increasing CO2 in the atmosphere... in addition, despite the lockdown, Germany has seen little to no reduction in the amount of NO2 in its air...

I’m just looking at the evidence bwhich makes far more sense and seems far more likely than CO2 causing el nino events. At least this theory is supported by observations and measurements and provides an actual physical mechanism.... and what is your source for how much water and the amount...

Read for comprehension.... I said that mammoth was asking for sulfur plumes in Antarctica to prove volcanic activity....the volcanic activity wasn’t found there via sulfur plumes...looks like sulfur plumes arent the end all and be all of volcanic activity...

What a denier... maybe here....you sound like mammoth looking for sulfur in east antarctica...the volcanoes there were discovered by measuring helium in the water...not sulfur plumes... https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018GL077618

Source?...or is your 100 year average just made up. Most of the 20th century warming can be traced to El Niño...therefore most of the change in climate since the 1890s can be traced to seismic activity....no magic gasses in the atmosphere... are you denying magma flows in the ring of fire...

it affects the climate but climate doesn’t initiate it... seismic activity indicates the magma flow...further research will reveal the rest...

The discussion is about AGW...I am talking about the AGW hypothesis and you drag in some tangential non sequiter and suggest That I learn something.

It wouldn’t surprise me to see an exodus away from urban centers towards the suburbs and more rural areas. The dangers of living in very close proximity have been hammered home in no uncertain terms.

Feel free to explain how you believe dynamic meteorology has provided empirical evidence that CO2 has altered the global climate....and let’s see the empirical evidence.

Dynamic meteorology based on a terribly and fatally flawed quaint 19th century hypothesis which still doesnt have the first bit of empirical evidence to support it...it seems that there reallly is a sucker born every minute...and they all fell for AGW...

Perhaps such questions will be answered when climate science comes to the realization that it ain’t CO2 and never will be And starts looking seriously at natural variabiliy.

Yet another published paper with references and empirical data spanning nearly half a century...sorry guy, this is a well supported theory as opposed to the magical hypothesis of AGW. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320068111_The_Missing_Link_in_El_Nino's_Phenomenon_Generation

Say some sour grape warmers who cant come up with a rational explanation for how CO2 might start El Niño events in the same place every time? Typical fail...