Foxfyre

Foxfyre

Gold Supporting Member
Eternal optimist From Desert Southwest USA
Joined
Messages
79,988
Reaction score
47,862
Points
2,645

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • antagon
    i agree with you there, but this is why i argue that science does not trespass on faith with its conclusions. this has never happened to me nor to the majority of other scientists. i dont think there needs to be a new philosophy introduced to protect that.
    SmarterThanHick
    No. Once again: you got negged because you could not continue a conversation for reasons of immaturity. You were not negged during the entirety of the time you disagreed with me. You were negged as soon as you decided to stick your fingers in your ears and claim you couldn't hear anything people disagreeing with you were saying.
    SmarterThanHick
    I made the reason for the neg very clear: "I take it by your complete avoidance of my remarks that I hit the nail on the head perfectly. this neg is for that ignorance." You didn't get negged throughout the entire time you made remarks I disagreed with. You got negged when your ignorance demanded you could no longer continue a conversation with someone requesting specific and intelligent support from you.

    But, as usual, and despite exactly stating WHY I negged you, you made it into something completely different. Ignorant to the core.
    Jeremy
    Thanks again. I'm 24 hr'd out right now but should have some rep coming available soon for ya. :)
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Back
Top Bottom