- Banned
- #61
Actually, the horse cart ran you over about 17 years ago, when the global temp stopped rising even though the CO2 levels continued to rise at a prodigious rate.
So you couldn't keep up your side on the research grant discussion and decided to try to change the topic. Got it.
Sceptics began questioning the theory when that began....and of course when we realized the shoddy type of work that was being put out....that was a major turning point for me. And then, when they resorted to outright falsification of data that sealed their doom.
You had made your mind up long before you had any evidence indicating ANYTHING. And you have no evidence of any shoddy work or outright falsification. We, on the other hand, have loads of evidence supporting the mainstream AGW theories and loads of evidence supporting the contention that AGW denialism - the campaign to intentionally MISINFORM the public - is funded by the fossil fuel industry and a number of conservative foundations and wealthy individuals.
And it is you that has no evidence. We have LOADS of evidence that your theory is kaput. You have nothing to support it but the same tired old GCM's that have been proven to be worse than flipping a coin.
That you can tell such lies with such little apparent difficulty is troubling. Please go read WG-I of AR5 before you try to tell us again that there is no evidence.
But keep on keepin on by all means! You're nothing if not entertaining when you melt down.
I can certainly see someone that supports a disinformation campaign suggesting quite sincerely that we should not react harshly to liars. It's a self-protective approach if nothing else.