You're forced to admit Bush was right. Here are your options.

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Wolfstrike, Feb 18, 2012.

  1. Wolfstrike
    Offline

    Wolfstrike Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,357
    Thanks Received:
    277
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Ratings:
    +1,170
    Moroccan Immigrant Charged in Attempted Bombing of U.S. Capitol - Businessweek

    THIS POST IS NOT SARCASTIC.




    it turns out we were wrong about the government's definition of "Weapons of mass destruction"

    this Muslim had guns and a bomb suicide vest and has been charged by the government for possessing "Weapons of mass destruction"

    anyone walking around saying Bush lied about Iraq having "Weapons of mass destruction" can no longer do so as surely the Iraqi government had firearms and small bombs.



    here are your options.

    A) You vote for Obama and support exaggerated claims when charging people of crimes in domestic cases.

    B) You vote for the Republicans and agree with invading countries because they have firearms and small bombs.

    C) You vote for Ron Paul and support a more Constitutional approach to personal liberties and a reluctance o invade foreign nations.



    ...those are your choices
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. jodylee
    Offline

    jodylee Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2007
    Messages:
    405
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +65
    If he runs for a third party I think he'll have a better chance, its about time Americans started voting for a party other than the two main one's, and prove you have a healthy democracy.
     
  3. Not2BSubjugated
    Online

    Not2BSubjugated Callous Individualist

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2012
    Messages:
    1,552
    Thanks Received:
    241
    Trophy Points:
    130
    Location:
    In a mysanthropic malaise
    Ratings:
    +346
    The headline of this topic had me thinking about third party candidates, too, and the pros and cons of personally having political ideals that don't fall into either major political camp. Primary advantage? When I argue with people they can't point at the points of view of popular politicians from one party or the other and imply that, because that's my party, somehow my contradiction of those viewpoints is grounds for dismissal of my point. Small pro, though, when the con is that I rarely find suitable candidates to vote for at any level of my voters ballot :(
     
  4. Article 15
    Offline

    Article 15 Dr. House slayer

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2008
    Messages:
    24,673
    Thanks Received:
    4,832
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Ratings:
    +4,859
    D) I will vote for Obama, hold the opinion that equating firearms and small bombs to "WMD" is retarded, and consider the idea that this charge vindicates Bush's Iraq folly as even more retarded than the charge itself.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
    Last edited: Feb 18, 2012
  5. Peach
    Offline

    Peach Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    17,179
    Thanks Received:
    1,709
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,966
    As Bush claimed the WMD's were in Iraq, how is he "right"? Morocco is a notable distance from Iraq.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Sallow
    Offline

    Sallow The Big Bad Wolf. Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2010
    Messages:
    56,535
    Thanks Received:
    6,132
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    New York City
    Ratings:
    +7,394
    Here's the fun part. Saudi Arabia really did have something to do with 9/11.

    And they own part of FOX.

    :lol:
     
  7. NYcarbineer
    Offline

    NYcarbineer Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    95,791
    Thanks Received:
    11,241
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Finger Lakes, NY
    Ratings:
    +30,129
    Maybe if Ron Paul were actually running for president, as opposed to pretending to run for president by entering the GOP primaries where he knows he can't win,

    your thread might be relevant.
     
  8. LoneLaugher
    Offline

    LoneLaugher Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2011
    Messages:
    45,608
    Thanks Received:
    6,449
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Inside Mac's Head
    Ratings:
    +18,419
    Aww...you guys are gonna make them cry.
     
  9. Peach
    Offline

    Peach Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2009
    Messages:
    17,179
    Thanks Received:
    1,709
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Ratings:
    +1,966
    As 17 of the 19 monsters were SAUDI, and it was SAUDI financed, that is a fair conclusion. Bush slobbering over their King was a disgrace. His decision to ease off the 9/11 fight to invade Iraq must have been to spare his most favored nation embarrassment.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,223
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,233
    If an completely fair and untampered election is held the ideas of Ron Paul will not be voted for in large enough numbers fro him to secure the election.

    Ron Paul and his ideas are NOT what the American peopel want.

    You like them and that is fine.

    He can not win an American election if the people are allowed their will.
     

Share This Page