Young Women: What Turns You On ?

[WinterBorn]

Agreed. It seems logical that some women would feel that being asked such a question in a forum like this borders on "creepy".

It is creepy to you, if you are "creepy".

As for a "forum like this", I see no definition of this forum as being outside the bounds of this subject matter. A forum like this is perfectly applicable to just about any subject.

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

Women have a First Amendment and all the pussy; why do they have any problems?

And, women not having any good arguments in this thread is no better than right wingers having nothing but fallacy, gossip, hearsay, and soothsay; how inferior for discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation purposes. Women seem to only complain more not come up with better solutions at lower cost, for the sake of equality.

What arguments? Most women, undoubtedly, ignore you.

I prefer to win my arguments not ignore anyone.

I don't see you winning may arguments. But that aside, this is not about arguments. This is about whether women have to initiate sex with you to prove they are serious about equality.

The women who ignore you are not part of any argument. They are just part of your fantasies.

You have no valid arguments so it is not surprising you simply make up stories and believe you must be Right, yet you allege to not be on the right wing.

When you say you do not take women seriously about equality if they don't cater to your sexual fantasies, you lose all credibility. Period.

You choose not to have sex with anyone who is not attractive to you. The women are simply doing the same thing.

 

[danielpalos]

The fact that you admitted that you have never had sex with someone you are not attracted to at all says everything about what you actually think of equality.

In other words, you won't but you expect women to do it. And you expect them to initiate it, so you don't even have to work up the courage to approach them.

You are simply being one dimensional instead of at least two dimensional. I have also never had women claim she believes in equality and wants her turn to try to addict me to her crack, either. Not woman enough or not enough equality to go around on the women's wing, or is she just a homosexual? We know I can't be homosexual until women exhaust all of their options.

I don't doubt you have never had any woman try her turn at addicting you to her crack. And that has absolutely nothing to do with equality.

Should I thank goodness, with my having such low numbers and such little practice?

 

[danielpalos]

Judging women by what you see on porn sites is laughably ridiculous. Porn does not represent reality. Porn represents a created product based on what the consumer, not the actors, want. Also, there are physical limitations with men that women do not have.

It is just one metric. And, why is prostitution so available for women who allege equality for pay purposes?

You're right. There is just one metric. And videos created to entertain a specific audience, for money, is not that metric.

Yes, it is the definition of a market based metric. And, women are participants. Why is there any slut shaming at all in modern pornographic times?

No, it is not. Unless you think fictional TV shows should be used to judge people too. Porn is created to appeal to a certain segment of the population, and coerce them into spending money. That is all. It is no more reality based than Dr. Who is.

It is up to the morality of the individual and what they do with those morals.

 

[danielpalos]

When you say you do not take women seriously about equality if they don't cater to your sexual fantasies, you lose all credibility. Period.

You choose not to have sex with anyone who is not attractive to you. The women are simply doing the same thing.

You have no credibility to begin with. All you do is stereotype. Prostitution is alive and well. Why does it seem like professional women are simply braver under Capitalism than more social women for free?

And, most women have higher numbers and more practice with sex and sexuality; why are they such, "Big Chickens" with so much practice and such high numbers? Guys would make fun of other guys in such cases where the guy is a "Big Chicken" even though he has high numbers and plenty of practice.

 

[WinterBorn]

When you say you do not take women seriously about equality if they don't cater to your sexual fantasies, you lose all credibility. Period.

You choose not to have sex with anyone who is not attractive to you. The women are simply doing the same thing.

You have no credibility to begin with. All you do is stereotype. Prostitution is alive and well. Why does it seem like professional women are simply braver under Capitalism than more social women for free?

And, most women have higher numbers and more practice with sex and sexuality; why are they such, "Big Chickens" with so much practice and such high numbers? Guys would make fun of other guys in such cases where the guy is a "Big Chicken" even though he has high numbers and plenty of practice.

Once again, you ignore the attraction factor where women are concerned. You won't fuck someone who isn't attractive to you, and yet you ignore being attractive to women.

Want to get laid? Figure out how to be more attractive to them. And that does not just involve looks or money.

 

[protectionist]

If you routinely date women as young as 18, why are you asking this question here? Ask them!

As for dating those 18 year olds, how much do you actually have in common? My 2nd wife was 14 years younger than me, and there were issues because of the age difference. If what you claim is true, your age difference would be 3 times that.

That depends on one's definition of age. Contrary to what is often thought as popular belief (age being the number of years from when you were born), another definition of age is how you are physically and mentally, which comes from how you think and how you treat your body. Burt Reynolds, who drank, smoked, and did drugs, died 2 years ago at the age of 82. In contrast, Dick Van Dyke, who does none of those things, eats healthy, and exercises regularly (and does TV commercials for tai chi) was seen last week jogging UP a flight of stairs, at age 95.

As for my age gap, 3 times 14 would be a 42 year age gap. I am 56 years older than the 18 year olds I date, but they think I'm 34, without the slightest skepticism or question. That's because I really AM 34, in lifestyle years, and I really don't look that much older.

As for what we have in common, there's a number of things. Spectator sports, sex, music, loving animals, hiking, nature, etc.

Dick Van Dyke - 2021

protectionist - 2021

 

[protectionist]

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

What it tells me is you haven't read the thread. As someone already posted in the thread, there are very few young women in the forum. Helps to read the thread before posting.

 

[protectionist]

Women have a First Amendment and all the pussy; why do they have any problems?

And, women not having any good arguments in this thread is no better than right wingers having nothing but fallacy, gossip, hearsay, and soothsay; how inferior for discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation purposes. Women seem to only complain more not come up with better solutions at lower cost, for the sake of equality.

The thread is about IDEAS which stimulate sex, not about equality.

 

[protectionist]

Weird thread. Most Wrexham girls will tell you where you are going wrong. If you have worries about your performance why not ask your partner ? He or she will give you a few tips.

Nobody here has posted any notions about "performance", except you. Since that word came from you, maybe that is a concern of yours, but it's not part of the topic of the thread.

 

[protectionist]

You are simply being one dimensional instead of at least two dimensional. I have also never had women claim she believes in equality and wants her turn to try to addict me to her crack, either. Not woman enough or not enough equality to go around on the women's wing, or is she just a homosexual? We know I can't be homosexual until women exhaust all of their options.

 

[protectionist]

I don't doubt you have never had any woman try her turn at addicting you to her crack. And that has absolutely nothing to do with equality.

 

[protectionist]

Once again, you ignore the attraction factor where women are concerned. You won't fuck someone who isn't attractive to you, and yet you ignore being attractive to women.

Want to get laid? Figure out how to be more attractive to them. And that does not just involve looks or money.

Well, finally something that actually does address the question of the OP.

 

[katsteve2012]

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

What it tells me is you haven't read the thread. As someone already posted in the thread, there are very few young women in the forum. Helps to read the thread before posting.

I read the "thread"....entirely. And as "someone else" stated, "there are VERY FEW young women in the forum, which makes it obvious that either that is the case, or more likely, the ones who ARE here, chose NOT to answer such a question.

It is understandable why they would not.

 

[danielpalos]

When you say you do not take women seriously about equality if they don't cater to your sexual fantasies, you lose all credibility. Period.

You choose not to have sex with anyone who is not attractive to you. The women are simply doing the same thing.

You have no credibility to begin with. All you do is stereotype. Prostitution is alive and well. Why does it seem like professional women are simply braver under Capitalism than more social women for free?

And, most women have higher numbers and more practice with sex and sexuality; why are they such, "Big Chickens" with so much practice and such high numbers? Guys would make fun of other guys in such cases where the guy is a "Big Chicken" even though he has high numbers and plenty of practice.

Once again, you ignore the attraction factor where women are concerned. You won't fuck someone who isn't attractive to you, and yet you ignore being attractive to women.

Want to get laid? Figure out how to be more attractive to them. And that does not just involve looks or money.

It is all just talk on these forums. I argue with women about equality just for fun since we have a First Amendment and can explore political dialogue or concepts; just like I do regarding policies that promote and provide for the general welfare. Besides, what is the ratio of women to men on these forums? Porn sites are funner since I can tell women they have cute boobies when arguing with them. I try to be more political and more politically serious on political forums.

 

[protectionist]

I read the "thread"....entirely. And as "someone else" stated, "there are VERY FEW young women in the forum, which makes it obvious that either that is the case, or more likely, the ones who ARE here, chose NOT to answer such a question.

It is understandable why they would not.

DODGE! I'm going with what the poster said earlier that there are very few young women in the forum, (which is beared out by the posting over years), which negates your "conclusion, of what is "understandable".. In actuality. you don't understand if there are very few young women in the forum or not, so stop trying to base conclusions on it.

And no, I don't believe you read the thread.

 

[protectionist]

It is all just talk on these forums. I argue with women about equality just for fun since we have a First Amendment and can explore political dialogue or concepts; just like I do regarding policies that promote and provide for the general welfare. Besides, what is the ratio of women to men on these forums? Porn sites are funner since I can tell women they have cute boobies when arguing with them. I try to be more political and more politically serious on political forums.

This not a political forum. It is a forum which contains politics (among many other subjects)

 

[OldLady]

You ask women to tell you what turns them on, and then you want to ridicule her when she answers? lol Yeah, that will encourage more answers.

Can you read ? I did not ask HER. She (by her own admission) is an "Old" lady. The TITLE of the thread is >>
Young Women: What Turns You On ?... get it ?

So no, I did not ask "women" ( as you put it). I asked YOUNG women.

And I didn't ridicule her. I just commented on her choice of who is hot. I realize people can have varying opinions, it's just that Paul Ryan being called hot, was a bit weird. (most people would probably agree)

True, but I was young once. And you're wrong about Paul Ryan.

Forget the budget: Paul Ryan is hot!
By PATRICK GAVIN
08/12/2012 09:39 AM EDT

In 2008, Ryan was included in The Hill’s 50 Most Beautiful list with the following write-up: “Let’s face it, the reform of entitlements like Social Security is an important topic for members of Congress to debate. But listening to lawmakers speak about it on the floor does not exactly cause the heart to race. Unless, that is, the speech is being delivered by the tall, handsome and fiscally conservative Rep. Paul Ryan.”

And this from the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel in 2009:
“How many times when I was out on the campaign did I hear, … ‘Oh, he’s so good looking! Why would you want to run against him? He’s such a nice man!’” says Kenosha’s Paulette Garin, who lost a Democratic primary in ‘08 for Ryan’s seat.”
As news of Ryan’s veep nomination spread, the online world agreed.

” I’m just going to say what every other girl is thinking. VP candidate Paul Ryan is sexy.”
” I don’t agree with Paul Ryan at all, but I still think he’s sexy as hell.”
” I don’t think we’ve said it enough today; Paul Ryan is a sexy man.”
“H e looks like Superman.”
“ C’mon lefties, guys with guns are seriously sexy.”
“ Paul Ryan is gorgeous with dreamy blue eyes.”
” Neutral Objective Fact: Paul Ryan’s eyes are dreamy.”
” I’m voting for Romney because of Paul Ryan’s sparkly blue eyes. I mean…because…I agree with his views on stuff.”
” Look, I’m just gonna come right out and say what we all are thinking: Paul Ryan has dreamy bedroom eyes.”

Forget the budget: Paul Ryan is hot!

TMZ is quick to declare him “the hottest Vice Presidential candidate ever.”

www.politico.com

 

[katsteve2012]

I read the "thread"....entirely. And as "someone else" stated, "there are VERY FEW young women in the forum, which makes it obvious that either that is the case, or more likely, the ones who ARE here, chose NOT to answer such a question.

It is understandable why they would not.

DODGE! I'm going with what the poster said earlier that there are very few young women in the forum, (which is beared out by the posting over years), which negates your "conclusion, of what is "understandable".. In actuality. you don't understand if there are very few young women in the forum or not, so stop trying to base conclusions on it.

And no, I don't believe you read the thread.

No "dodge" involved here, merely the application of common sense.

The nearly non existent responses to your question from your target audience in this thread prove that to be a fact, and anyone who has read what little there is to read in the thread, knows that.

No time to waste on playing semantics.

Carry on.

 

[Gracie]

You're too old for a 55 year old woman.

I date 18 yr olds rountinely. Not difficult, Just keep in shape (slim),and follow the cam babes. Avoid stress and your hair will stay dark (I'm half Hispanic), and be a rock star like me. These pictures were taken a month ago >

View attachment 456073 View attachment 456075
View attachment 456076 View attachment 456077

Your OP confuses me. Are you looking for a young woman, perhaps, and think you will score one here at USMB?

I am no longer a young woman according to your age limit in who should respond. But for me..intelligence was a turn on. Taller than me. Good teeth. Didn't have to be handosm but had to love animals and have a kind nature but be manly. Didn't have to be skinny either as long as the other criteria was there. Long hair, or had hair. A gentleman who knew how to treat the ladies. Did I mention kindness? BIG factor. Not afraid of work...and didn't sit behind a desk designating others to do what he refused to do even though he may have been needed.
But I am old now, and have no desire for sex or men who plaster pics of themselves on a message board that post such requirements in a woman....so yer safe from us older hags.

Nothing wrong with my eyes even at my age. You would not be my type, then or now. Sorry.

 

[WinterBorn]

If you routinely date women as young as 18, why are you asking this question here? Ask them!

As for dating those 18 year olds, how much do you actually have in common? My 2nd wife was 14 years younger than me, and there were issues because of the age difference. If what you claim is true, your age difference would be 3 times that.

That depends on one's definition of age. Contrary to what is often thought as popular belief (age being the number of years from when you were born), another definition of age is how you are physically and mentally, which comes from how you think and how you treat your body. Burt Reynolds, who drank, smoked, and did drugs, died 2 years ago at the age of 82. In contrast, Dick Van Dyke, who does none of those things, eats healthy, and exercises regularly (and does TV commercials for tai chi) was seen last week jogging UP a flight of stairs, at age 95.

As for my age gap, 3 times 14 would be a 42 year age gap. I am 56 years older than the 18 year olds I date, but they think I'm 34, without the slightest skepticism or question. That's because I really AM 34, in lifestyle years, and I really don't look that much older.

As for what we have in common, there's a number of things. Spectator sports, sex, music, loving animals, hiking, nature, etc.

View attachment 459889 Dick Van Dyke - 2021 View attachment 459890 protectionist - 2021

I am glad you are happy with your life, and are healthy.

But I am not buying that girls think you are 34 years old. Unless the light is bad or they don't spend any time with people other than their own age. I guess they could be telling you that to make you feel good. Nothing wrong with that.