Young Women: What Turns You On ?

[WinterBorn]

What turns women on (or people in general) is usually a pretty private thing.

I applaud women for telling their spouse or partner exactly what they like or what turns them on. But an old man asking women what turns them on gets pretty scary for most.

Typically it comes down to "None of your business".

I'm not an "old man". I date women as young as 18 (routinely), who think I'm 34, and offer no question about it whatsoever. Most are in their 30s.

As for what is my business, that is the young woman's business, my business, and none of yours.

If you routinely date women as young as 18, why are you asking this question here? Ask them!

As for dating those 18 year olds, how much do you actually have in common? My 2nd wife was 14 years younger than me, and there were issues because of the age difference. If what you claim is true, your age difference would be 3 times that.

 

[katsteve2012]

Agreed. It seems logical that some women would feel that being asked such a question in a forum like this borders on "creepy".

It is creepy to you, if you are "creepy".

As for a "forum like this", I see no definition of this forum as being outside the bounds of this subject matter. A forum like this is perfectly applicable to just about any subject.

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

 

[danielpalos]

And for them to ignore you, as they wish you would ignore them? That is also the Golden Rule.

Let me ask you, have you ever had sex with someone you were not attracted to at all?

No. I have also never had a woman tell me I can't be an incel when she is around, either. "Slut shaming" would not work on any woman who is that equal.

 

[danielpalos]

Women enjoy an absolute advantage regarding things sexual. How many women have been used by whole gangs of guys compared to men getting used by whole gangs of women?

Please do an investigation on that, and come back with a report.

As for "absolute advantage regarding things sexual" the recent invention of the lovense lush has added a whole new dimension to that, wouldnt you say ? (although since men are involved as well, the lovense has to be a benefit to us guys too-sometimes saves the day (or night)

Most porn sites tend to confirm my hypothesis. How many videos with "gangs of women" on one guy can you find? Gangs of guys on one or several women is much more common. I guess women don't really believe in equality as much as they allege in "pay forums".

 

[danielpalos]

Agreed. It seems logical that some women would feel that being asked such a question in a forum like this borders on "creepy".

It is creepy to you, if you are "creepy".

As for a "forum like this", I see no definition of this forum as being outside the bounds of this subject matter. A forum like this is perfectly applicable to just about any subject.

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

Women have a First Amendment and all the pussy; why do they have any problems?

And, women not having any good arguments in this thread is no better than right wingers having nothing but fallacy, gossip, hearsay, and soothsay; how inferior for discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation purposes. Women seem to only complain more not come up with better solutions at lower cost, for the sake of equality.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Weird thread. Most Wrexham girls will tell you where you are going wrong. If you have worries about your performance why not ask your partner ? He or she will give you a few tips.

 

[WinterBorn]

And for them to ignore you, as they wish you would ignore them? That is also the Golden Rule.

Let me ask you, have you ever had sex with someone you were not attracted to at all?

No. I have also never had a woman tell me I can't be an incel when she is around, either. "Slut shaming" would not work on any woman who is that equal.

It has nothing to do with slut shaming. It is a simple question of whether or not you have ever had sex with someone you were not attracted to at all.

You said 'No'.

 

[WinterBorn]

Women enjoy an absolute advantage regarding things sexual. How many women have been used by whole gangs of guys compared to men getting used by whole gangs of women?

Please do an investigation on that, and come back with a report.

As for "absolute advantage regarding things sexual" the recent invention of the lovense lush has added a whole new dimension to that, wouldnt you say ? (although since men are involved as well, the lovense has to be a benefit to us guys too-sometimes saves the day (or night)

Most porn sites tend to confirm my hypothesis. How many videos with "gangs of women" on one guy can you find? Gangs of guys on one or several women is much more common. I guess women don't really believe in equality as much as they allege in "pay forums".

Judging women by what you see on porn sites is laughably ridiculous. Porn does not represent reality. Porn represents a created product based on what the consumer, not the actors, want. Also, there are physical limitations with men that women do not have.

 

[WinterBorn]

Agreed. It seems logical that some women would feel that being asked such a question in a forum like this borders on "creepy".

It is creepy to you, if you are "creepy".

As for a "forum like this", I see no definition of this forum as being outside the bounds of this subject matter. A forum like this is perfectly applicable to just about any subject.

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

Women have a First Amendment and all the pussy; why do they have any problems?

And, women not having any good arguments in this thread is no better than right wingers having nothing but fallacy, gossip, hearsay, and soothsay; how inferior for discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation purposes. Women seem to only complain more not come up with better solutions at lower cost, for the sake of equality.

What arguments? Most women, undoubtedly, ignore you.

 

[danielpalos]

And for them to ignore you, as they wish you would ignore them? That is also the Golden Rule.

Let me ask you, have you ever had sex with someone you were not attracted to at all?

No. I have also never had a woman tell me I can't be an incel when she is around, either. "Slut shaming" would not work on any woman who is that equal.

It has nothing to do with slut shaming. It is a simple question of whether or not you have ever had sex with someone you were not attracted to at all.

You said 'No'.

Slut shaming only seems to be a female problem not a male problem for equality purposes. Why is that if they are equal for pay purposes?

 

[danielpalos]

Judging women by what you see on porn sites is laughably ridiculous. Porn does not represent reality. Porn represents a created product based on what the consumer, not the actors, want. Also, there are physical limitations with men that women do not have.

It is just one metric. And, why is prostitution so available for women who allege equality for pay purposes?

 

[danielpalos]

Agreed. It seems logical that some women would feel that being asked such a question in a forum like this borders on "creepy".

It is creepy to you, if you are "creepy".

As for a "forum like this", I see no definition of this forum as being outside the bounds of this subject matter. A forum like this is perfectly applicable to just about any subject.

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

Women have a First Amendment and all the pussy; why do they have any problems?

And, women not having any good arguments in this thread is no better than right wingers having nothing but fallacy, gossip, hearsay, and soothsay; how inferior for discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation purposes. Women seem to only complain more not come up with better solutions at lower cost, for the sake of equality.

What arguments? Most women, undoubtedly, ignore you.

I prefer to win my arguments not ignore anyone.

 

[WinterBorn]

And for them to ignore you, as they wish you would ignore them? That is also the Golden Rule.

Let me ask you, have you ever had sex with someone you were not attracted to at all?

No. I have also never had a woman tell me I can't be an incel when she is around, either. "Slut shaming" would not work on any woman who is that equal.

It has nothing to do with slut shaming. It is a simple question of whether or not you have ever had sex with someone you were not attracted to at all.

You said 'No'.

Slut shaming only seems to be a female problem not a male problem for equality purposes. Why is that if they are equal for pay purposes?

The fact that you admitted that you have never had sex with someone you are not attracted to at all says everything about what you actually think of equality.

In other words, you won't but you expect women to do it. And you expect them to initiate it, so you don't even have to work up the courage to approach them.

 

[WinterBorn]

Judging women by what you see on porn sites is laughably ridiculous. Porn does not represent reality. Porn represents a created product based on what the consumer, not the actors, want. Also, there are physical limitations with men that women do not have.

It is just one metric. And, why is prostitution so available for women who allege equality for pay purposes?

You're right. There is just one metric. And videos created to entertain a specific audience, for money, is not that metric.

 

[WinterBorn]

Agreed. It seems logical that some women would feel that being asked such a question in a forum like this borders on "creepy".

It is creepy to you, if you are "creepy".

As for a "forum like this", I see no definition of this forum as being outside the bounds of this subject matter. A forum like this is perfectly applicable to just about any subject.

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

Women have a First Amendment and all the pussy; why do they have any problems?

And, women not having any good arguments in this thread is no better than right wingers having nothing but fallacy, gossip, hearsay, and soothsay; how inferior for discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation purposes. Women seem to only complain more not come up with better solutions at lower cost, for the sake of equality.

What arguments? Most women, undoubtedly, ignore you.

I prefer to win my arguments not ignore anyone.

I don't see you winning may arguments. But that aside, this is not about arguments. This is about whether women have to initiate sex with you to prove they are serious about equality.

The women who ignore you are not part of any argument. They are just part of your fantasies.

 

[danielpalos]

The fact that you admitted that you have never had sex with someone you are not attracted to at all says everything about what you actually think of equality.

In other words, you won't but you expect women to do it. And you expect them to initiate it, so you don't even have to work up the courage to approach them.

You are simply being one dimensional instead of at least two dimensional. I have also never had women claim she believes in equality and wants her turn to try to addict me to her crack, either. Not woman enough or not enough equality to go around on the women's wing, or is she just a homosexual? We know I can't be homosexual until women exhaust all of their options.

 

[danielpalos]

Judging women by what you see on porn sites is laughably ridiculous. Porn does not represent reality. Porn represents a created product based on what the consumer, not the actors, want. Also, there are physical limitations with men that women do not have.

It is just one metric. And, why is prostitution so available for women who allege equality for pay purposes?

You're right. There is just one metric. And videos created to entertain a specific audience, for money, is not that metric.

Yes, it is the definition of a market based metric. And, women are participants. Why is there any slut shaming at all in modern pornographic times?

 

[danielpalos]

Agreed. It seems logical that some women would feel that being asked such a question in a forum like this borders on "creepy".

It is creepy to you, if you are "creepy".

As for a "forum like this", I see no definition of this forum as being outside the bounds of this subject matter. A forum like this is perfectly applicable to just about any subject.

Whatever, dude. I'm not a woman, but most women that I know would be creeped out by such a question in a forum like this.

That being said, I still don't see many women at all responding to your thread.

That should tell you something.

Anyway, carry-on.

Women have a First Amendment and all the pussy; why do they have any problems?

And, women not having any good arguments in this thread is no better than right wingers having nothing but fallacy, gossip, hearsay, and soothsay; how inferior for discovering sublime Truth (value) through argumentation purposes. Women seem to only complain more not come up with better solutions at lower cost, for the sake of equality.

What arguments? Most women, undoubtedly, ignore you.

I prefer to win my arguments not ignore anyone.

I don't see you winning may arguments. But that aside, this is not about arguments. This is about whether women have to initiate sex with you to prove they are serious about equality.

The women who ignore you are not part of any argument. They are just part of your fantasies.

You have no valid arguments so it is not surprising you simply make up stories and believe you must be Right, yet you allege to not be on the right wing.

 

[WinterBorn]

The fact that you admitted that you have never had sex with someone you are not attracted to at all says everything about what you actually think of equality.

In other words, you won't but you expect women to do it. And you expect them to initiate it, so you don't even have to work up the courage to approach them.

You are simply being one dimensional instead of at least two dimensional. I have also never had women claim she believes in equality and wants her turn to try to addict me to her crack, either. Not woman enough or not enough equality to go around on the women's wing, or is she just a homosexual? We know I can't be homosexual until women exhaust all of their options.

I don't doubt you have never had any woman try her turn at addicting you to her crack. And that has absolutely nothing to do with equality.

 

[WinterBorn]

Judging women by what you see on porn sites is laughably ridiculous. Porn does not represent reality. Porn represents a created product based on what the consumer, not the actors, want. Also, there are physical limitations with men that women do not have.

It is just one metric. And, why is prostitution so available for women who allege equality for pay purposes?

You're right. There is just one metric. And videos created to entertain a specific audience, for money, is not that metric.

Yes, it is the definition of a market based metric. And, women are participants. Why is there any slut shaming at all in modern pornographic times?

No, it is not. Unless you think fictional TV shows should be used to judge people too. Porn is created to appeal to a certain segment of the population, and coerce them into spending money. That is all. It is no more reality based than Dr. Who is.