no. the situation is: I know what the definition of emotional is, and I know what the definition of compassionate is... and I know that they are two different words with two different meanings.... and anyone who says, (emotional, compassionate, whatever you want to call it) uses words in an imprecise way.
Again it is your assumption that I was using the words as synonyms. I wasn't.
It is not a "problem", it is just a fact. I have no "problem" with it... I just know that "having a conversation" with someone who uses words with such callous and apparently deliberate imprecision is nothing I really care to engage in. I am sorry if you think that is "rude and condescending".... it is not meant to be either.
Again your assumption. Don't give me this it's not what you meant shit either. You aren't interested in what anyone 'meant' to say. Your interested in pointing out perceived errors and makeing people feel inferior to you. it is rude and you know it. You said as much to make yourself look smart and elite just like Larkin does.
It is further evidence that all you are interested in is demeaning when you refused to reply to the conversation worthy parts of the post all together and pick out the ones that you can most easily use to denegrate someone.