Uncensored2008
Libertarian Radical
The corrupt Clinton Machine brought in a spoiler - Ross Perot, in 1992, when Bill had literally zero chance of winning. His insane populist bullshit split the vote and pulled much of the independent block, who are swayed by slogans rather than substance.
Most Perot voters I know from 1992, including my Brother in Law, had no intention of voting for Bush. Fact is, when Perot was weaker in 1996 than 1992, more of his voters broke for Clinton than Dole.
Trump is another Clintonista working to get Hilliary elected against all odds.Trump will not get the GOP nomination, and will run third party to siphone off votes on behalf of the Clinton gang, whom he works for.
Guy, talk to some of your fellow right wingers on this site, people who normally agree with you. A lot of them are for Trump.
Lowest level since 2008? Dayum, what an accomplishment. And all this with less than half the number of people holding full time jobs!
Life's too short to try to correct all your math problems.
As usual, it isn't what you don't know that is the problem, it's that what you know is false;
{To be sure, the numbers do indeed suggest that Perot garnered his support primarily from Reagan/Bush voters from the 1980s. In 1984, the Republican share of the presidential vote was 59 percent. In 1988, it was 53 percent. In 1992, the combined Bush/Perot vote share was 56 percent. Democrats got 41 percent of the vote in 1984, 46 percent in 1988, and 43 percent in 1992. Bush won 51 percent of the vote in both Vermont and California in 1988. Bush and Perot collectively won 53 percent of the vote in both Vermont and California in 1992. Bush won 61 percent of the vote in Florida in 1988. Bush/Perot won 61 percent of the vote in Florida in 1992.}
Did Ross Perot Elect Bill Clinton? | Race 4 2016