Obama administration writes check for $1.5 Billion to Iran without consulting congress

Yet another indication of whose side Democrats are really on. They are remaking the world to our disadvantage.
 
It was frozen money since Carter . It was theirs, its not up to us who they fund, we fund an army and AF in almost every nation. They are not funding Isis and never were.
 
It was frozen money since Carter . It was theirs, its not up to us who they fund, we fund an army and AF in almost every nation. They are not funding Isis and never were.
They've funded a lot of terrorism and insurgents the world over. We should have taken the money for payment and not backed dropping the sanctions.
 
Iran had set up a $400 million trust fund for such purchases, which was frozen along with diplomatic relations in 1979. In settling the claim, which had been tied up at the Hague Tribunal since 1981, the U.S. is returning the money in the fund along with "a roughly $1.3 billion compromise on the interest," the statement said.

U.S. to pay Iran $1.7 billion in legal settlement - CNNPolitics.com


"For the United States, the settlement could save us billions of dollars that could have been pursued by Iran. There was no benefit to the United States in dragging this out," he said.

Kerry said the claim was in the amount of a $400 million trust fund used by Iran to purchase military equipment from the United States prior to the break in diplomatic ties, plus $1.3 billion in interests.


US to pay Iran $1.7 bn in debt and interest: Kerry
 
It was frozen money since Carter . It was theirs, its not up to us who they fund, we fund an army and AF in almost every nation. They are not funding Isis and never were.

There is no relativity between us and them. None.
 
Republicans control congress. Wtf are they doing beside sticking their thumbs up their collective asses?

Cant republicans accomplish ANYTHING?
 
Republicans control congress. Wtf are they doing beside sticking their thumbs up their collective asses?

Cant republicans accomplish ANYTHING?

As has been noted for several years, there seems to be little difference between Democrats and establishment Republicans.
 
Reagan could have put that Iranian money in a trust account and just left it alone. He could have simply said that when the money got released they would get whatever the fund had accumulated. Instead, he decided to snatch it up and spend it and the interest like it was his and put the burden of paying it back into the future. Just more Reagan legacy crap to deal with. Like giving birth to modern day terrorism wasn't enough.
 
Reagan could have put that Iranian money in a trust account and just left it alone. He could have simply said that when the money got released they would get whatever the fund had accumulated. Instead, he decided to snatch it up and spend it and the interest like it was his and put the burden of paying it back into the future. Just more Reagan legacy crap to deal with. Like giving birth to modern day terrorism wasn't enough.

He should have taken it as a spoil of war. Modern day terrorism is largely Carter's progeny.
 
It was frozen money since Carter . It was theirs, its not up to us who they fund, we fund an army and AF in almost every nation. They are not funding Isis and never were.

Wrong...wrong and wrong again.
$500 million was froze and for good Goddamn reason...you don't pay $1.3 Billion in "interest" on money that was FROZE...perhaps you don't know what frozen assets are????
 
Reagan could have put that Iranian money in a trust account and just left it alone. He could have simply said that when the money got released they would get whatever the fund had accumulated. Instead, he decided to snatch it up and spend it and the interest like it was his and put the burden of paying it back into the future. Just more Reagan legacy crap to deal with. Like giving birth to modern day terrorism wasn't enough.

He should have taken it as a spoil of war. Modern day terrorism is largely Carter's progeny.
He didn't take it as spoils of war and he was the one who began the practice of negotiating with terrorist, not Carter. Carter kept the hostages in Iran and refused to negotiate. Other than the Iranian hostages, America was not targeted by non-nation players. Reagan gave us that era. He owns the terror epidemic that was born and grew under his leadership.
 
Reagan could have put that Iranian money in a trust account and just left it alone. He could have simply said that when the money got released they would get whatever the fund had accumulated. Instead, he decided to snatch it up and spend it and the interest like it was his and put the burden of paying it back into the future. Just more Reagan legacy crap to deal with. Like giving birth to modern day terrorism wasn't enough.

He should have taken it as a spoil of war. Modern day terrorism is largely Carter's progeny.
Carter kept the hostages in Iran and refused to negotiate.

What Carter did was refuse to exercise American power by demanding the hostages back within 24 hours, or strangling that Islamist baby in the crib if they were not returned.

We will pay for his weakness for generations to come.
 
He didn't take it as spoils of war and



Ole George Bush could have taken all the oil fields of Iraq as spoils of war. Worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

But no. You don't hear any republicans bitching that Bush didn't do that.

But obama gives back.Iranian money and its the end of the world. Weird.
 
What Carter did was refuse to exercise American power by demanding the hostages back within 24 hours, or strangling that Islamist baby in the crib if they were not returned.




Ain't hindsite great?

And George Bush could have decided not to invade a country that did not attack us.

Think things would be better if we never invaded Iraq?
 
He didn't take it as spoils of war and



Ole George Bush could have taken all the oil fields of Iraq as spoils of war. Worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

But no. You don't hear any republicans bitching that Bush didn't do that.

But obama gives back.Iranian money and its the end of the world. Weird.

He didn't give the money back - they paid $1.3 billion in "interest" to a clear enemy of ours - and Kerry ADMITTED THAT PART OF THE MONEY WILL LIKELY FALL INTO HANDS OF TERRORIST
 
It was frozen money since Carter . It was theirs, its not up to us who they fund, we fund an army and AF in almost every nation. They are not funding Isis and never were.

Fine. Give it back to them but why do they get interest?
 
He didn't take it as spoils of war and



Ole George Bush could have taken all the oil fields of Iraq as spoils of war. Worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

But no. You don't hear any republicans bitching that Bush didn't do that.

But obama gives back.Iranian money and its the end of the world. Weird.

He didn't give the money back - they paid $1.3 billion in "interest" to a clear enemy of ours - and Kerry ADMITTED THAT PART OF THE MONEY WILL LIKELY FALL INTO HANDS OF TERRORIST

You have to realize that the left is OK with that so it is pointless to point that out to them. I think if a canidate actually said that I am going to support our enemies efforts to destroy us the left would actually vote for them. I miss the days of Bill Clinton who actually would have thought that this was a dumb idea and said no. What happen to the democratic party.
 

Forum List

Back
Top