Truthmatters
Diamond Member
- May 10, 2007
- 80,182
- 2,272
- 1,283
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They just now settled that case?
Dayummmm.....
...Valley Swim Club officials said race had nothing to do with it and that there were too many children for the lifeguards on duty.
maybe if black kids were not kicked out of the pool they could learn to swim
maybe if black kids were not kicked out of the pool they could learn to swim
Well they took the pool to court, had it shut down via their actions, and got some money, which is no doubt the only reason they took the pool to court. I don't approve of discrimination and I certainly believe it to be a bad business model, however, the owner/s of a property or business should be allowed to deny anyone they want for whatever reason (government institutions excluded). For the record, I would never swim at an establishment that denies entry to black people. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court erred on title 7 (I beleive it's called title 7) of the Civil Rights Bill. Where the punishment is supposed to fit the crime the money they received is certainly larger than the act of the supposed crime.
Apparently several parents have lost their baby sitters as well... From the link: At the time, Valley Swim Club officials said race had nothing to do with it and that there were too many children for the lifeguards on duty.
maybe if black kids were not kicked out of the pool they could learn to swim
Apparently several parents have lost their baby sitters as well... From the link: At the time, Valley Swim Club officials said race had nothing to do with it and that there were too many children for the lifeguards on duty.
And the kids conveniently happened to be black...
maybe if black kids were not kicked out of the pool they could learn to swim
maybe if black kids were not kicked out of the pool they could learn to swim
Now they'll have 15 grand apiece for lessons.