Publius1787
Gold Member
- Jan 11, 2011
- 6,211
- 676
- 190
maybe if black kids were not kicked out of the pool they could learn to swim
Well they took the pool to court, had it shut down via their actions, and got some money, which is no doubt the only reason they took the pool to court. I don't approve of discrimination and I certainly believe it to be a bad business model, however, the owner/s of a property or business should be allowed to deny anyone they want for whatever reason (government institutions excluded). For the record, I would never swim at an establishment that denies entry to black people. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court erred on title 7 (I beleive it's called title 7) of the Civil Rights Bill. Where the punishment is supposed to fit the crime the money they received is certainly larger than the act of the supposed crime.
That's nice of you to say that and, maybe it's just me and I have a very low opinion on humanity but I don't think that if that lawsuit wouldn't of happened that pool would not only still be open but be profitable as well. But, hey I could be totally wrong here and the community would rise up against the people who made that policy at the pool. But all in all I'm not mad to see a business who uses discrimination as a policy go down.
No one ever is. I just don't like to see it go down because of an unconstitutional title in the civil rights code and a bad decision in a court case. I want to see it go down because the community refuses to swim there. Let me give you a practical example.
You own a bar and decide to have ladies night on Fridays. Ladies get in at no cover charge. Should men take the bar to court on charges of discrimination? Well, it has been done. See here >>>>>> Lawyer Wants to Take 'Ladies' Night' Case to Supreme Court - DNAinfo.com New York
If you own your business it is your property. If you want to deny access to your property then, it’s your property, you should have that right. No one’s rights are violated if they are refused access on your property. Why? No one has the right to access your property and they can go somewhere else. It's not nice, I would not frequent such a business, but I challenge anyone to find the article in the U.S. Constitution that says it's against the law. Even Clarence Thomas agrees with this.
Edit: What if you have more male sports than female sports at your school? Take them to court for gender discrimination? It's been done! In fact, a school football team was'nt even allowed to raise it's own money to continue playing football after taken to court a second time.
Last edited: