You Can Have Sex With Them; Just Don't Photograph Them

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by JBeukema, Mar 3, 2011.

  1. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,702
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,706
    You Can Have Sex With Them; Just Don't Photograph Them - Reason Magazine
     
  2. Montrovant
    Offline

    Montrovant Fuzzy bears!

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,105
    Thanks Received:
    2,513
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Beyond the Veil
    Ratings:
    +5,479
    There is just so much wrong with this :evil:

    The first thing that popped into my head as I started reading is a Family Guy skit, where police go into a hotel room where a man is paying a woman to have sex. They say they are going to arrest them for prostitution, but the man says it's fine because they are going to film it, so it's porn. Sort of like this in reverse.

    The article brings up problems with mandatory sentencing, clashes between state and federal law, unnecessary prosecution, just a host of issues.
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2011
  3. FA_Q2
    Offline

    FA_Q2 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2009
    Messages:
    15,807
    Thanks Received:
    2,319
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +5,356
    Amazing how idiotic the law is at times.
     
  4. chanel
    Offline

    chanel Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    12,130
    Thanks Received:
    2,744
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    People's Republic of NJ
    Ratings:
    +2,748
    As a police officer, he should have known the law. As a police officer, he is in a position of power, not unlike a teacher or priest. The law may be ambiguous, but justice will prevail. Karma's a bitch pervert.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. George Costanza
    Offline

    George Costanza A Friendly Liberal

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2009
    Messages:
    5,184
    Thanks Received:
    1,088
    Trophy Points:
    155
    Location:
    Los Angeles area.
    Ratings:
    +1,192
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Aug 18, 2014
  6. Montrovant
    Offline

    Montrovant Fuzzy bears!

    Joined:
    May 4, 2009
    Messages:
    14,105
    Thanks Received:
    2,513
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Location:
    Beyond the Veil
    Ratings:
    +5,479
    Are you saying you consider it justice that a man can legally have a sexual relationship, but if he takes a photograph of any of the sexual activities in that legal relationship, he has committed a crime? I get that impression because of the final sentence in your post.
     
  7. chanel
    Offline

    chanel Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    12,130
    Thanks Received:
    2,744
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    People's Republic of NJ
    Ratings:
    +2,748
    No. I think it's justice that he is now in trouble and he has been publicly exposed for his perversion. A 34 year old married cop may LEGALLY sleep with a child of 16, but it is still morally reprehensible. If it weren't for the porno law, he may never have been exposed. Karma.
     
  8. JBeukema
    Offline

    JBeukema BANNED

    Joined:
    Apr 23, 2009
    Messages:
    25,613
    Thanks Received:
    1,702
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    everywhere and nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,706
    If she's old enough to make her own decisions

    and he's old enough to make his own decisions

    What's so horrible about them making eachother happy?
     
  9. Two Thumbs
    Offline

    Two Thumbs Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2010
    Messages:
    34,721
    Thanks Received:
    5,935
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Where ever I go, there I am.
    Ratings:
    +12,670
    16 is just to young to be fucking a grown man let alone with another teenager.

    In trouble for the pics? lame

    man, my heads going to implode, my oldest is 16, she could have girls like this around her.
     
  10. spectrumc01
    Offline

    spectrumc01 I give you....the TRUTH

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    1,823
    Thanks Received:
    257
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    The United States
    Ratings:
    +260
    It's a good thing we didn't set the age of consent laws in this country until after the human race was already established. If people had to wait until 16/17 years of age to procreate the human race would have died out in the early stages, say around 300 -400 ad.

    Families have been and still are trading off daughters and arranging marriages, and have been doing so for centuries. It is illegal to have sexual relations with these girls that are under age, but it isn't if the parents give their consent for the two to get married first. Our laws on this matter are bizzare at best.
     

Share This Page