unless there is a de novo trial, the court is only there to dispose of issues of law.
you know that, right?
Of course. He's an attorney. Right?
You claim to be one, too.
And assuming that you are, you know you should be at least a little more interested in being honest about a critique of a SCOTUS decision.
All they did WAS to review an issue of law.
Did you really not figure that out?