Yes...there was collusion and it is a crime

The only "collusion" there is any proof of is between Medvedev and the meat puppet faggot.



Once Holder's minions are purged from the DOJ and hitlary is proven to have "colluded" with russian to sell our uranium I'm sure you'll ignore that too you malignant piece of shit.


.
 
2957cv.jpg


:rofl:
 
And if trump pardons Manafort to keep him from flipping....that is text book Obstruction of Justice. The Den Congress in 2019 will impeach him.

What a Pit if Snakes this Regime is.....
 
The Real Collusion is the one between the embedded Obama Admin, DNC, and hiLIARy campaign to rig the election and undermine the Trump Admin.
 
So many flips, so little collusion
And, shockingly, not one single leak to the voluminous mob of fellow travelers in the media....If that isn't evidence that the moonbats don't have so much as a popcorn fart, nothing is.


Indeed. That is the Big Tell, and why the desperately resorted to leaking fake stuff from the fake dossier produced by the hiLIARy campaign.
 
The only "collusion" there is any proof of is between Medvedev and the meat puppet faggot.



.

What do you think that clip has to do with the topic?

Was Obama seeking help from Russia to get re-elected? Or was he informing Putin of the political realities of trying to achieve a policy goal during an election year where Republicans and pseudocons like yourself disagreed with Obama if he said the sky is blue?

Hmmmm...
 
From the article:




Daily Comment
The Department of Justice Thinks That Collusion Is a Crime
By Jeffrey Toobin

April 4, 2018


Toobin-Department-of-Justice.jpg

The special counsel in the Russia investigation, Robert Mueller, now has the authority, and the legal theory, to bring criminal charges for collusion.

Photograph by Tin Shen / Xinhua / eyevine / Redux

Is collusion a crime? That is one of the central questions of the investigation into Russian efforts to interfere in the 2016 U.S. elections. Even if it could be proved that Donald Trump and his supporters worked with the Russian government, or with Russian citizens, to win the Presidential race, would that activity have violated United States law? It’s long been an article of faith for Trump supporters, and for Trump himself, that collusion is not illegal. As the President told the Times in an interview last December, “There is no collusion, and even if there was, it’s not a crime.”

Now, it appears, Trump’s own Justice Department may have a different view. That conclusion appears in a document released earlier this week, in the course of pre-trial litigation in the case of Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chairman, on charges including money laundering. Lawyers for Manafort, who has pleaded not guilty to the charges, asked that they be dismissed on the grounds that Robert Mueller, the special counsel, did not have the right to bring them; Manafort’s lawyers assert that the case—which centers on work that Manafort did for the pro-Russia government of Ukraine—was outside Mueller’s jurisdiction.

In response to this claim, Mueller filed a brief that laid out the basis for him to bring the case. As described in the brief, after Mueller was appointed, in May of last year, he asked Rod Rosenstein, the Deputy Attorney General and Mueller’s supervisor, for specific authorization for the areas that he wanted to investigate. In a memorandum issued on August 2nd, Rosenstein spelled out the details of Mueller’s jurisdiction. He said that Mueller had the authority to investigate:

Allegations that Paul Manafort:

Committed a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government’s efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for President of the United States, in violation of United States law;
 

Forum List

Back
Top