Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
that wasn't an observed, measured example...it was a mathematical model.
They used SB, correctly. Still laughing at you.
that wasn't an observed, measured example...it was a mathematical model.
They used SB, correctly. Still laughing at you.
Of course they did...and the SB equation describes a one way energy transfer....laughing right back at you and laughing at you for thinking you have anything to laugh at me about....and you still have no observed, measured example of energy moving from cool to warm....while every observed measurement ever made is from warm to cool.
It must really burn you up that you've been searching and searching and still can't find a source that claims one way flow.
Let me know when Science magazine admits their error.
FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER
I became sick of your babbling a long time ago and certainly didn't ask for any more of it. I want a REFERENCE - an authority, an expert, someone who knows what the fuck they're talking about to tell us, in no uncertain terms, that the SB equation describes ONE-FUCKING-WAY heat transfer.
Fucking idiot
It must really burn you up that you've been searching and searching and still can't find a source that claims one way flow.
Again, I haven't even looked...there is no need. The fact that you can't find a single observed, measured example of two way energy flow means that every energy transfer ever measured has been in one direction....Now if you were providing measurement after measurement after measurement of observed, two way energy movement...I would be worried about my position...but after all this, you still can't produce one.
We have been measuring energy movement for a very long time now...and not one of them has been an observation of energy moving in two directions at once...that leaves one other alternative and that alternative just happens to fit my position to a T.
Let me know when Science magazine admits their error.
Science magazine presented a mathematical model...one that is demonstrably wrong by every measured energy exchange ever made....
FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER FIND ANY REFERENCE THAT SAYS STEFAN-BOLTZMAN DESCRIBES A ONE-WAY HEAT TRANSFER
The SB law and equation itself describes a one way energy flow. Have you become rolling thunder now believing that if you shout in all caps that your argument becomes more forceful...I don't read all caps...so speak like an adult, or be ignored. As I have pointed out, in the language of math, just like in spoken language when you have things going in two directions, and you want to describe that movement in detail, you must have an expression describing the movement in each direction. You have failed at the most basic level....you don't even understand that the equation describes a one way flow of energy.
You could end the discussion immediately...do a little dance, and declare indisputable victory by simply producing an observed, measured example of energy moving in two directions at once....this has gone on for how many pages now?....and no example...and it could go on for 10,000 more pages...you making claims...calling me stupid...and making more claims and still you would have no game winning example of an observed, measured instance of energy moving in two directions at once.
What you have is a belief...what you have is faith...what you don't have is a single observed, measured example of what you claim....because none exist. Now prove me wrong by providing the example. Toddster keeps posting his mathematical model as if that were an example...he has become as addled as war mists thinking that models are reality.
No need since that isn't my position....that's your inaccurate interpretation of my positionWhat you need to find is the source of the idea you've got that an object can STOP radiating if surrounded by warmer stuff. Have you found that yet? I know you've looked. Doesn't it bother you that you can't find it? Doesn't it bother you that EVERYTHING you've found agrees with with what Todd and Ian and FCT and I have been telling you? That you're a fucking idiot?
Idiot says what? LOL!
You said it...not me... why not put an end to this by providing an observed measured example of energy moving in two directions at once....or admit that you can't provide it....Although an admission really isn't necessary at this point
Idiot says what? LOL!
You said it...not me... why not put an end to this by providing an observed measured example of energy moving in two directions at once....or admit that you can't provide it....Although an admission really isn't necessary at this point
Idiot says what? LOL!
You said it...not me... why not put an end to this by providing an observed measured example of energy moving in two directions at once....or admit that you can't provide it....Although an admission really isn't necessary at this point
Why not put an end to this by providing an observed measured example of energy moving in only one direction....or admit that you can't provide it....Although an admission really isn't necessary at this point
Idiot says what? LOL!
You said it...not me... why not put an end to this by providing an observed measured example of energy moving in two directions at once....or admit that you can't provide it....Although an admission really isn't necessary at this point
Why not put an end to this by providing an observed measured example of energy moving in only one direction....or admit that you can't provide it....Although an admission really isn't necessary at this point
Every measurement ever made is of energy moving in one direction. Pick any measured temperature transfer.....if no work is being done...one object will be cooling while the other is warming till such time as they are the same...one way energy movement. Two way energy movement can't be measured because it doesn't happen. Claiming that you can't find any measured energy movement that only measures energy moving in one direction is just stupid...every one indicates one way movement....heat a pot of water to boiling....take it off the eye....set a pot of room temperature water next to it....put a thermometer in both....see one thermometer indicating that it is getting warmer....see one indicating cooling...one way energy movement from the hot pot to the cool pot.
SSDD doesn't understand that net flow doesn't mean one way flow.
You can yell at him all you want but it isn't going to change his mind. If he relinquishes that point then his worldview of physics collapses. He aint gonna do it.
Not in the least...I don't need encouragement or reassurance from anyoneSSDD doesn't understand that net flow doesn't mean one way flow.
You can yell at him all you want but it isn't going to change his mind. If he relinquishes that point then his worldview of physics collapses. He aint gonna do it.
I know, his frustration must be unbearable.
Everyone here disagrees with his claim, but he can't post a single source that agrees with him.
If I accept 2 way energy flow I leave the realm of observation and the real and enter the realm of faith. Let me know when two way energy flow is observedSSDD doesn't understand that net flow doesn't mean one way flow.
You can yell at him all you want but it isn't going to change his mind. If he relinquishes that point then his worldview of physics collapses. He aint gonna do it.
