R
rdean
Guest
Thought that was interesting.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The "it's snowing, therefore global warming isn't happening" logic nonwithstanding, 2014 as a whole also looks to be the warmest year ever
2014 is set to be the warmest year EVER ... and it s even changing the taste of our wine Daily Mail Online
(Sorry for citing the Daily Mail, but interesting that even right-wing publications like them talk openly about climate change)
The "it's snowing, therefore global warming isn't happening" logic nonwithstanding, 2014 as a whole also looks to be the warmest year ever
2014 is set to be the warmest year EVER ... and it s even changing the taste of our wine Daily Mail Online
(Sorry for citing the Daily Mail, but interesting that even right-wing publications like them talk openly about climate change)
The "it's snowing, therefore global warming isn't happening" logic nonwithstanding, 2014 as a whole also looks to be the warmest year ever
2014 is set to be the warmest year EVER ... and it s even changing the taste of our wine Daily Mail Online
(Sorry for citing the Daily Mail, but interesting that even right-wing publications like them talk openly about climate change)
We're merely poking fun at you clowns. Whenever it's warm it's global warming, but when it's cold it's just normal! Doesn't matter though, (and have you ever noticed how the anti gun socks are all globull warmers too! Amazing!) you guys have lost the people. Six years ago whenever there was a globull warming story the comments sections after the story would run 50/50, not though the comments are overwhelmingly skeptical, over 90% now know that globull warming is a scam.
You're toast little progressive troll socko.
That all doesn't matter. A handful of deniers devote their every waking moment to obsessively spamming denier cult mantras across the internet. That's what matters.
Now, while most people would call that evidence of cultish behavior among the deniers, Westwall calls it evidence his side has won. That speaks of the sad state of the denier cult. Lacking any real science or data that supports them, they're reduced to declaring victory over blog comments.
Can you even analyze that? 'Very likely' isn't scientific evidence. My guess is that 97% (which is bullshit anyway) of climate scientists need funding.Corporate funding and disinformation is winning
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities- NASA
Corporate funding and disinformation is winning
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities- NASA
Corporate funding and disinformation is winning
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities- NASA
Let's see.......skeptical research has received 100 million dollars over the years.... Globull warmers have received well over 100 billion. So....which number is bigger?
It's funny how you idiots claim the warmest this, and the warmest that, and yet everyplace I'm reading about they are freezing their collective asses off. Even Sin City looks set to enjoy a snow storm. The second in 6 years.
Corporate funding and disinformation is winning
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities- NASA
Let's see.......skeptical research has received 100 million dollars over the years.... Globull warmers have received well over 100 billion. So....which number is bigger?
The issue is that the media makes it out to be some kind of debate when it is a complete consensus. You don't have to get huge amount of funding to understand the data btw, my bother is a private sector climate scientist and I assure you, anyone schooled in the field accepts it is happening and caused by humans.
Republicans don't believe in science. They believe science is a faith, evolution a lie and climate change a conspiracy. You can't fight that kind of determined ignorance. They believe scientists are on the take and contribute next to nothing to nothing.Corporate funding and disinformation is winning
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities- NASA
Republicans don't believe in science. They believe science is a faith, evolution a lie and climate change a conspiracy. You can't fight that kind of determined ignorance. They believe scientists are on the take and contribute next to nothing to nothing.Corporate funding and disinformation is winning
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities- NASA
In fact, the only weapon Republicans have against science is "skepticism". They look at what science discovers or uncovers and say "I don't believe it". No contrary evidence. Nothing. Just "I don't believe it".
There's no such thing as a complete consensus, that's an oxymoron. No, they do not all agree, your brother pulled the wool over your eyes.Corporate funding and disinformation is winning
Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Consensus
Ninety-seven percent of climate scientists agree that climate-warming trends over the past century are very likely due to human activities- NASA
Let's see.......skeptical research has received 100 million dollars over the years.... Globull warmers have received well over 100 billion. So....which number is bigger?
The issue is that the media makes it out to be some kind of debate when it is a complete consensus. You don't have to get huge amount of funding to understand the data btw, my bother is a private sector climate scientist and I assure you, anyone schooled in the field accepts it is happening and caused by humans.