Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 14,820
- 4,970
- 210
Yeah, and pigs fly!I'm not bullying; I am attempting rational discourse...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, and pigs fly!I'm not bullying; I am attempting rational discourse...
Appeal to False Authority Fallacy. Appeal to Definition Fallacy. Dictionaries do not have authority over any word definition. They do not own any word definition.
There is no such thing as a "scientific theory"; just a theory. A theory is an explanatory argument. But back to the definition... It is saying that "scientific evidence" is "evidence", which is what I said it was. Hence, there is no such thing as "scientific evidence"... It is just evidence.Scientific evidence is evidence which serves to either support or counter a scientific theory or hypothesis.
Science is NOT a "method"; it is a set of falsifiable theories.Such evidence is expected to be empirical evidence and interpretation in accordance with scientific method.
Not how science works... Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's ALL science is... It really is quite simple...Standards for scientific evidence vary according to the field of inquiry, but the strength of scientific evidence is generally based on the results of statistical analysis and the strength of scientific controls.
You're a dickhead (because I say so). That's ALL you are... It really is quite simple..Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's ALL science is... It really is quite simple...
Once again, you pick out one little bit of my argumentation and ignore all the rest... You don't seem interested in civil discourse at all... Your religious fundamentalism blinds you...Yeah, and pigs fly!I'm not bullying; I am attempting rational discourse...
Are there any unfalsifiable theories in science?You're a dickhead (because I say so). That's ALL you are... It really is quite simple..Science is a set of falsifiable theories. That's ALL science is... It really is quite simple...
Hilarious! You really have no clue, do you. I shouldn't laugh.the definition... It is saying that "scientific evidence" is "evidence", which is what I said it was. Hence, there is no such thing as "scientific evidence"... It is just evidence.
just stand next to me and keep talking, so I look smart.
Which a fraud like you should already have come to expect from people. One of your obviously favorite bits of quackery is the Gish Gallop. So people who have to deal with you are forced to strip away all of your meaningless pap to get to your only, germane premise. Which,of course, is always just the same,idiotic premise, reiterated 100 different ways. Frauds like you, who are in possession of no evidence whatsoever and no compelling arguments, have to resort the these late night Shamwow seller tactics. Because, as we both know, you possess neither the logical tools nor the knowledge to directly tackle any hard earned scientific knowledge.Once again, you pick out one little bit of my argumentation and ignore all the rest..
Which a fraud like you should already have come to expect from people. One of your obviously favorite bits of quackery is the Gish Gallop. So people who have to deal with you are forced to strip away all of your meaningless pap to get to your only, germane premise. Which,of course, is always just the same,idiotic premise, reiterated 100 different ways. Frauds like you, who are in possession of no evidence whatsoever and no compelling arguments, have to resort the these late night Shamwow seller tactics. Because, as we both know, you possess neither the logical tools nor the knowledge to directly tackle any hard earned scientific knowledge.Once again, you pick out one little bit of my argumentation and ignore all the rest..
So, instead, you attempt to beguile and confuse and naysay. Of course,you know as well as anyone how full of shit you are. That's why you're not taking baths with toasters or jumping off your roof to see if you fall up. But hey, whether or not you fall up is 'anyone's guess', right? Haha...how embarrassing you are ...
That's a pet peeve of mine too. It's remarkable how many supposedly literate knot heads can't get it right. A true testimate to just how piss poor the educational system in this country has become.
Of more concern is the number of americans who reject evolution.That's a pet peeve of mine too. It's remarkable how many supposedly literate knot heads can't get it right. A true testimate to just how piss poor the educational system in this country has become.
Well said.Yes, many atheists are closed-minded... you are correct.Goodness, so many atheists are closed-minded -- and you act like it's a superior mindset.Nor do we need to, because this is a deterministic universe with no magic. So no, your idea is nutball.Yes, it is. We cannot go back in time to see what actually happened...
This is due to their religious fundamentalism in their atheism (yes, atheism IS a religion). All a religion is is an initial circular argument with other arguments stemming from it. Atheism makes the initial circular argument that god(s) do not exist. All atheist argumentation is based on that initial circular argument. Likewise with Christianity, all Christian argumentation is based on the initial circular argument that Jesus Christ exists and is who he says he is. It all comes back to the initial circular argument... That's how religion works. Many people fail to recognize this, and instead act like religion and theism are synonymous terms... While theism is a part of what religion is, religion goes well beyond theism...
Looky there at you, completely rejecting out of hand one possible explanation.On the contrary,it's you religious dogmatists who are much more closed minded. Evidence based thinkers are always willing and compelled to change their minds, in light of new evidence. You magical dogmatists claim to have the answers and refuse to consider any evidence that might contradict your strident religious dogma.Yes, many atheists are closed-minded...
Thus the religious goobers in this thread dismissing mountains of mutually supportive evidence and the scientific theories the evidence renders true. Thus your embarrassingly stupid arguments that boil down to the moronic idea, "Nothing is 100% certain (*except your favorite magical fetishes), therefore every idea and explanation is equally valid."
Of course, except for any idea that contradicts whatever magical horseshit happens to be the subject of your fetishes at the time. Just so we are clear on your silly "rules".
Then you neglected this one for some reason. LolThat's a pet peeve of mine too. It's remarkable how many supposedly literate knot heads can't get it right. A true testimate to just how piss poor the educational system in this country has become.
So an education only counts if your a liberal ?
Why? What difference does it make in anyone's life?Of more concern is the number of americans who reject evolution.That's a pet peeve of mine too. It's remarkable how many supposedly literate knot heads can't get it right. A true testimate to just how piss poor the educational system in this country has become.
Not once have I done that, whiner. Might a rainbow unicorn have writen the bible and is somewhere laughing at you right now? Sure. But there is no evidence of that magical horseshit, so i will call it magical horseshit.Looky there at you, completely rejecting out of hand one possible explanation.
Great, maybe you get it. When you believe magical borseshit (as you do), then you can oncoporate any idea. You canpoint at anything, from evolution to plate tectonics, and say, "god did that!". Saying so is useless in any practical sense, but it may have value to you in comforting you. Go right ahead,it affects nothing.I'm a Christian. I can accept the idea of a Big Bang. I can accept the idea of evolution. I see no reason why God has not used both ideas.
Not once have you done that...really?Not once have I done that, whiner. Might a rainbow unicorn have writen the bible and is somewhere laughing at you right now? Sure. But there is no evidence of that magical horseshit, so i will call it magical horseshit.Looky there at you, completely rejecting out of hand one possible explanation.
Oh, look -- there you go again, completely rejecting out of hand one possible explanation.Great, maybe you get it. When you believe magical borseshit (as you do), then you can oncoporate any idea. You canpoint at anything, from evolution to plate tectonics, and say, "god did that!". Saying so is useless in any practical sense, but it may have value to you in comforting you. Go right ahead,it affects nothing.I'm a Christian. I can accept the idea of a Big Bang. I can accept the idea of evolution. I see no reason why God has not used both ideas.
That doesn't make sense. I have not rejected that faith exists. Are you high?You've been rejecting the idea of faith in every thread about it.
Also, did you mean testament? education system?That's a pet peeve of mine too. It's remarkable how many supposedly literate knot heads can't get it right. A true testimate to just how piss poor the educational system in this country has become.