Would Another Assault Weapons Ban Be Effective?

[M14 Shooter]

After Bruen, of course, the Court will likely use the ‘historical tradition’ test to justify striking down state AWBs.
Indeed, the intent of the ‘historical tradition’ test was to establish a rationale for overturning state AWBs. as there was ample other legal precedent available to invalidate may issue provisions of states’ concealed carry laws.

Finally... some honesty from Clayton.

 

[Lesh]

We had a ten year ban before.
Did nothing to reduce access to 'assault weapons', and thus had no effect.

In your opinion. But then you’re a gun nutter so…

 

[M14 Shooter]

Comic book fantasy.
What they are...is the most effective weapon for mass shootings

Of the 636 'mass shootings' in 2022, 8 involved 'assault weapons'.
Of the 660 people killed in 'mass shootings' in 2022, 54 were willed with 'assault weapons'
20,000,000 AR15s in the US; in 2022, 8 were used to kill 54 people.
YOU want to ban them.

 

[M14 Shooter]

In your opinion.

Verifiable fact.
-No weapons were confiscated
-'Assault weapons' were still manufactured and sold (see pic, below)
Thus: Did nothing to reduce access.
No effect.

 

[miketx]

For me to be a coward, I would have to have a desire to “come and get them” and be afraid to act on that desire.

I don’t. You are an idiot

Come get them, coward.

 

[wamose]

Bitching about assault weapons and abortions are the Democrat's favorite imaginary gripes against Republicans. Democrats harp on those two things because it takes no intelligence, thought or logic. It's easier to bitch than it is to fix shit and govern, which they are incapable of.

 

[Lesh]

Verifiable fact.
-No weapons were confiscated
-'Assault weapons' were still manufactured and sold (see pic, below)
Thus: Did nothing to reduce access.
No effect.


View attachment 762101

So they made a mistake. Both should have been banned.

 

[marvin martian]

So they made a mistake. Both should have been banned.

Why?

 

[M14 Shooter]

So they made a mistake. Both should have been banned.

Thus, your agreement:
The 1994 AWB did nothing to reduce access to AWs, and thus, could not have an effect on shootings.

There's no honest, factual, rational argument that either rifle "should" be, or should have been, banned, and there's no honest, factual, rational argument that any such ban is constitutional.

 

[Lesh]

Thus, your agreement:
The 1994 AWB did nothing to reduce access to AWs, and thus, could not have an effect on shootings.

There's no honest, factual, rational argument that either rifle "should" be, or should have been, banned, and there's no honest, factual, rational argument that any such ban is constitutional.

nope

 

[Lesh]

Did assault weapon ban bring down mass shooting deaths?

It is one of the most controversial gun control policies: A ban on assault weapons and large capacity magazines that all

www.politifact.com

 

[M14 Shooter]

Did assault weapon ban bring down mass shooting deaths?

It is one of the most controversial gun control policies: A ban on assault weapons and large capacity magazines that all

www.politifact.com

Nice post-hoc fallacy you have here -- never mind the fact you already agreed the 1994 AWB did not reduce availability of these weapons, and thus could not have had an effect on shootings.

 

[M14 Shooter]

nope

Good to see you agree there's no honest, factual, rational argument that either rifle "should" be, or should have been, banned, and there's no honest, factual, rational argument that any such ban is constitutional.

 

[Lesh]

Good to see you agree there's no honest, factual, rational argument that either rifle "should" be, or should have been, banned, and there's no honest, factual, rational argument that any such ban is constitutional.

"Nope"

That's the OPPOSITE of agreement retard

 

[Lesh]

Nice post-hoc fallacy you have here -- never mind the fact you already agreed the 1994 AWB did not reduce availability of these weapons, and thus could not have had an effect on shootings.

Another lie. You're really stupid. We have agreed on nothing

 

[M14 Shooter]

"Nope"
That's the OPPOSITE of agreement retard

Oh, I see.
Well then... give us your honest, factual, rational argument that both rifles should be banned, and your honest, factual, rational argument that any such ban is constitutional.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Another lie. We have agreed on nothing

Oh, I see..
Well then....give us your honest, factual, rational argument as to how, the 1994 AWB, which did not reduce access to 'assault weapons', had the effrct of reducing shootings while it was in force.

 

[M14 Shooter]

You're really stupid

Never has there been a more ironic statement.

 

[Lesh]

Oh, I see..
Well then....give us your honest, factual, rational argument as to how, the 1994 AWB, which did not reduce access to 'assault weapons', had the effrct of reducing shootings while it was in force.

I posted an article above. Go read it. I stand by that

 

[Esdraelon]

Forced confiscation of firearms from law abiding citizens (ironically) at the point of a gun is the ultimate goal.

Yep... and the same people who are in such an uproar over 40,000 deaths a year, would stand by cheerfully watching 10X that number if those dying were resisting confiscation. They're the worst kind of hypocrites.