Workplace enforcement and forced deportatin

[LilOlLady]

WORKPLACE ENFORCEMENT AND FORCED DEPORTATION.

Is the only effective solution to the illegal immigration problem. The recession has proved that if there are no jobs, they cannot work they will leave and they have been "self deporting" and taking their children with them and crossing are down because of the recession and not because the border is “securer than ever.”

Rand Pandering Paul BS; “If they want to work?” Where are we going to get the jobs for 11 million immigrants added to the workforce when we have 12 million unemployed Americans, seniors looking for jobs to supplement their income and student looking for low wage part-time jobs to help pay for college? Already taken by illegal aliens.

Can anyone see they rhetoric and lies about Comp. Immig. Reform with a path to citizenship with imaginary fines, learning English, pay back taxes that don’t exist. and go to the back of an non-existence line. No, Paul said “in” line. This is not a tale your 5th graders would even fall for.

There is not one leader that is patriotic and brave enough to say “forced” “self” deportation, workplace enforcement by E-Verify. Is there really a “statute of limitation” on illegal immigration” when we can no longer touch them? Are we nation of laws or we are an unlawful nation?

If the American people fall for any of the insanity we are a lost nation indeed and if worse shape than we can ever imaging if the pass anything remotely resembling amnesty in the name of Comp. Immig. Reform it will be the worse mistake ever in U.S. history.

 

[waltky]

Granny says, "Dat's right - dat's who really writes our immigration laws...

Business, labor close on deal for immigration bill
30 Mar.`13 WASHINGTON (AP) — Prospects for a Senate deal on an ambitious rewrite of the nation's immigration laws improved markedly as business and labor appeared ready to set aside their differences over a new low-skilled worker program holding up the agreement.

The AFL-CIO and U.S. Chamber of Commerce had been fighting over wages for tens of thousands of low-skilled workers who would be brought in under the new program to fill jobs in construction, hotels and resorts, nursing homes and restaurants, and other industries. But on Friday, officials from both sides said there was basic agreement on the wage issue, and Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said a final deal on the low-wage worker dispute was very close. That likely would clear the way for Schumer and seven other senators in a bipartisan group to unveil legislation the week of April 8 to overhaul the U.S. immigration system — strengthening the border, cracking down on employers, allowing in tens of thousands of new high- and low-skilled workers and providing a path to citizenship for the estimated 11 million illegal immigrants already in the country.

"We're feeling very optimistic on immigration: Aspiring Americans will receive the road map to citizenship they deserve and we can modernize 'future flow' without reducing wages for any local workers, regardless of what papers they carry," AFL-CIO spokesman Jeff Hauser said in a statement. "Future flow" refers to future arrivals of legal immigrants. Under the emerging agreement between business and labor, a new "W'' visa program would bring tens of thousands of lower-skilled workers a year to the country. The program would be capped at 200,000 a year, but the number of visas would fluctuate, depending on unemployment rates, job openings, employer demand and data collected by a new federal bureau pushed by the labor movement as an objective monitor of the market.

The workers would be able to change jobs and could seek permanent residency. Under current temporary worker programs, personnel can't move from employer to employer and have no path to permanent U.S. residence and citizenship. And currently there's no good way for employers to bring many low-skilled workers to the U.S. An existing visa program for low-wage nonagricultural workers is capped at 66,000 per year and is supposed to apply only to seasonal or temporary jobs. The Chamber of Commerce said workers would earn actual wages paid to American workers or the prevailing wages for the industry they're working in, whichever is higher. The Labor Department determines prevailing wage based on customary rates in specific localities, so that it varies from city to city.

There was also disagreement about how to deal with certain higher-skilled construction jobs, such as electricians and welders, and it appears those will be excluded from the deal, said Geoff Burr, vice president of federal affairs at Associated Builders and Contractors. Burr said his group opposes such an exclusion because, even though unemployment in the construction industry is high right now, at times when it is low there can be labor shortages in high-skilled trades, and contractors want to be able to bring in foreign workers. But unions pressed for the exclusion, Burr said. The low-skilled worker issue had loomed for weeks as perhaps the toughest matter to settle in monthslong closed-door talks on immigration among the senators, including Republicans John McCain of Arizona and Marco Rubio of Florida. The issue helped sink the last major attempt at immigration overhaul in 2007, when the legislation foundered on the Senate floor after an amendment was added to end a temporary worker program after five years, threatening a key priority of the business community. The amendment passed by just one vote, 49-48. President Barack Obama, a senator at the time, joined in the narrow majority voting to end the program after five years.

Business, labor close on deal for immigration bill

 

[MaryL]

I am told that we should accept illegal aliens. They are being called euphemistically: IMMIGRANTS. I know a lie when I see one. America is undergoing a major paradigm shift in logic. Homosexuality is like Heterosexuality, illegal immigration is just like legally immigrating. PT Barnum said it best, there is a fool born every minute. George Bush fooled most of you too. Illegal immigrants can and should just immigrate…legally, and this shouldn’t even be an issue, but here we are. Paradigm shift. I am not buying any of this malarkey.