Wisconsin Democrat Gordon Hines To Republican Michelle Litjens: "You Are F***ing Dead

[Truthmatters]

In this day and age people should be leaving the words of violence behind.

The man should not have said dead.

Now when some real violence shows up from the left then you can bring his name back up and say he contributed to the atmosphere that lead to it.



Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.


We are now in agreement and that is a great starting place for us ALL to walk away from violent inuedos and hold the people responsible who use this launguage to further their political carreers.


I condem this mans talk of death.

 

[WillowTree]

On Monday, Milwaukee AM 620 WTMJ radio host Charlie Sykes detailed an encounter between Democratic State Rep. Gordon Hintz, who had previously been busted in a prostitution sting, and Republican State Rep. Michelle Litjens, in which the rules of civility were completely ignored after a vote to “engross” a state budget repair bill.

“After the vote to engross, he turns to a female conservative Republican, who is also from the Oshkosh area, looks at her and says, ‘You are f—ing dead,’” Sykes said. “He didn’t say ‘f—ing,’ he said the whole thing. He says to a female colleague, ‘You are f—ing dead.

..

 

[rightwinger]

Regardless of party affiliation it reflects the degrading civility in our political system. These people are supposed to set the example to the public. While they may be relatively mid level politicians, there has to be a certain decourum when you take the floor.

Now I read the comments from the right saying "See..they do it too"

It needs to stop from both sides

 

[WillowTree]

He was busted in a prostitution ring. Harry Reid gonna frown down on him.

 

[Shadow]

This whole 'civility' thing is not really working for the Democrats, is it? Oh dear. They really should learn to obey their Messiah.

If only that was their intent in the first place when arriving at these "civility rules". Nope...they just wan't everyone else to tow the mark and do what they want them to. They of course don't need to be civil,cuz the rules don't apply to them.

 

[USArmyRetired]

Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.

What are you talking about. There is nothing wrong with Palin talking about guns. She talks about the right to bear arms all the time. A lot of people do. She has never advocated violence towards anyone. She never used target hairs, she used survey symbols and people were to stupid to tell the difference. Palin had absolutely nothing to do with the Arizona tragedy. You use the word 'tragedy's' (plural) perpetuated from the right. What tragedys (plural) are you talking about?

 

[California Girl]

In this day and age people should be leaving the words of violence behind.

The man should not have said dead.

Now when some real violence shows up from the left then you can bring his name back up and say he contributed to the atmosphere that lead to it.

Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.

We are now in agreement and that is a great starting place for us ALL to walk away from violent inuedos and hold the people responsible who use this launguage to further their political carreers.

I condem this mans talk of death.

Are you still pretending that Gifford's shooting was in any way connected to the right? You are pathetic with your faux condemnation.

 

[Truthmatters]

In the very same way the OP here is saying violent speech effects our community.

Do you think it only pertains to one party?

 

[bucs90]

Yet another example of the left creeping towards violence when they don't get their way.

i have seen a few times when the right has done a little creeping too....

How about actually becoming violent? The left's history of violence:

North Korea
China
Cuba
Venezuela
Russia
USSR
Japan
Italy under Moussoulini
National Socialist Party of Germany
Greek gov't worker violent riots
French " " " "
English " " " "
Spain " " " "
SEIU lynching black man
Fox News reporter assaulted
WI union member assaults female


Well, I can go on with the list. But "equality for all" is a great dream, but remember: All men are created equal in worth, not ability. Anyone who says all men are created absolutely equal in ability: Some folks are born as geniuses, others are born as natural athletes. A horse jockey and NBA center could not switch roles.

So that said, how does the left get equality for all when it is obviously not possible to have total equality? By using massive force to create a society as equal as possible. Which we have seen in far left regimes worldwide.

 

[R.D.]

He was busted in a prostitution ring. Harry Reid gonna frown down on him.

Fwank would be pwoud

 

[R.D.]

Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.

You really need to stop being such a tool...

I condem this mans talk of death.

Well, I am sure everyone will now sleep a little better

 

[Rat in the Hat]

In this day and age people should be leaving the words of violence behind.

The man should not have said dead.

Now when some real violence shows up from the left then you can bring his name back up and say he contributed to the atmosphere that lead to it.



Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.


We are now in agreement and that is a great starting place for us ALL to walk away from violent inuedos and hold the people responsible who use this launguage to further their political carreers.


I condem this mans talk of death.

Let's see, what do we have here?

Someone on Palin's staff who puts crosshairs on a map vs. a WI Dem Congressman who looks a female colleague in the eye and tells her "You are F'n dead.

Yep, they seem equal to me.

 

[Avatar4321]

Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.

What are you talking about. There is nothing wrong with Palin talking about guns. She talks about the right to bear arms all the time. A lot of people do. She has never advocated violence towards anyone. She never used target hairs, she used survey symbols and people were to stupid to tell the difference. Palin had absolutely nothing to do with the Arizona tragedy. You use the word 'tragedy's' (plural) perpetuated from the right. What tragedys (plural) are you talking about?

You have to understand, TM wants to excuse violence and violent rhetoric on the left by pretend the right is doing the same thing.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

This is 'Death Threat' pure and simple. There was no excuse for this democrat to do this. It was done right after the Republicans voted and passed the Wisconsin budget when he turned to her and said it. This acting on violent impulses is outrageous. It is uncalled for. Representative Litgens should have this guy arrested for threatening a federal official.

Which federal official was threatened?

 

[Claudette]

Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.

What are you talking about. There is nothing wrong with Palin talking about guns. She talks about the right to bear arms all the time. A lot of people do. She has never advocated violence towards anyone. She never used target hairs, she used survey symbols and people were to stupid to tell the difference. Palin had absolutely nothing to do with the Arizona tragedy. You use the word 'tragedy's' (plural) perpetuated from the right. What tragedys (plural) are you talking about?

You have to understand, TM wants to excuse violence and violent rhetoric on the left by pretend the right is doing the same thing.

She just can't help herself.

According to her the Dems are one step away from Sainthood.

It kinda sucks when they show what real Saints they ain't.

 

[Truthmatters]

In this day and age people should be leaving the words of violence behind.

The man should not have said dead.

Now when some real violence shows up from the left then you can bring his name back up and say he contributed to the atmosphere that lead to it.



Now Im glad to see you people agree that Palin should not have been talking about guns and targeting human beings with cross hairs and that it was resonable for others to mention her tactics in light of the tragedys we have seen perpitrated from the right.


We are now in agreement and that is a great starting place for us ALL to walk away from violent inuedos and hold the people responsible who use this launguage to further their political carreers.


I condem this mans talk of death.

Why are you dishonest people trying to alter my words?

 

[del]

This is 'Death Threat' pure and simple. There was no excuse for this democrat to do this. It was done right after the Republicans voted and passed the Wisconsin budget when he turned to her and said it. This acting on violent impulses is outrageous. It is uncalled for. Representative Litgens should have this guy arrested for threatening a federal official.

Which federal official was threatened?

usaretard isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

 

[R.D.]

Why are you dishonest people trying to alter my words?

Where?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

How bout that Democrat "Civil Discourse?" The MSM will ignore this very disturbing story. He had a 'D' by his name. Now if he had that 'R' by his name?...

 

[grunt11b]

In former posts I have said that the left always accuses the right of being that of which they really are themselves. In this case the Democrat is acting violent, but yet you will see Pelosi and Reid and the other bozos accusing the right and the tea party members of being violent without any proof whatsoever to back it up.
Now who REALLY is the violent ones? Is it the left and the Unions or the Conservatives and the Tea Party? Anyone can honestly see it for what it is.