Winning the Senate is HUGE

Trumper/right wingers are BRAGGING about how they are reshaping the courts for a generation.

If the GOP holds the Senate...there will be no going back
Are you suggesting that we should be appointing Constitutional Activists Judges? Or are you OK with us appointing judges that simply follow the law and the constitution and leave law making to the elected Congressional branch?
You can bet that I am!!!
The idea that conservative judges and Justices ane anything BUT activists is a total myth

If you call ruling WITH the constitution as activist, you're absolutely right.

The Supreme Court ruled that corporations had election rights and could fund PACS which is hardly Constitutional. Corporations should have no rights in election law. They're not voters, and they have no interests at all. Only voters should be allowed to donate or participate in elections.

Corporations should have no rights in election law. They're not voters, and they have no interests at all.

Free speech. Even if you're criticizing Hillary Clinton.
 
Trumper/right wingers are BRAGGING about how they are reshaping the courts for a generation.

If the GOP holds the Senate...there will be no going back
Are you suggesting that we should be appointing Constitutional Activists Judges? Or are you OK with us appointing judges that simply follow the law and the constitution and leave law making to the elected Congressional branch?
You can bet that I am!!!
The idea that conservative judges and Justices ane anything BUT activists is a total myth

If you call ruling WITH the constitution as activist, you're absolutely right.
If they would prefer that we seat conservative activists rather than strict constructionists, well, that can be arranged.
 
Are you suggesting that we should be appointing Constitutional Activists Judges? Or are you OK with us appointing judges that simply follow the law and the constitution and leave law making to the elected Congressional branch?
You can bet that I am!!!
The idea that conservative judges and Justices ane anything BUT activists is a total myth

If you call ruling WITH the constitution as activist, you're absolutely right.

The Supreme Court ruled that corporations had election rights and could fund PACS which is hardly Constitutional. Corporations should have no rights in election law. They're not voters, and they have no interests at all. Only voters should be allowed to donate or participate in elections.

Corporations should have no rights in election law. They're not voters, and they have no interests at all.

Free speech. Even if you're criticizing Hillary Clinton.
Neither do Unions
 
Trumper/right wingers are BRAGGING about how they are reshaping the courts for a generation.

If the GOP holds the Senate...there will be no going back
Are you suggesting that we should be appointing Constitutional Activists Judges? Or are you OK with us appointing judges that simply follow the law and the constitution and leave law making to the elected Congressional branch?
You can bet that I am!!!
The idea that conservative judges and Justices ane anything BUT activists is a total myth

If you call ruling WITH the constitution as activist, you're absolutely right.

The Supreme Court ruled that corporations had election rights and could fund PACS which is hardly Constitutional. Corporations should have no rights in election law. They're not voters, and they have no interests at all. Only voters should be allowed to donate or participate in elections.
What about Unions?
 

Forum List

Back
Top