Will You Still Have a Job, If Hillary Gets Elected ?

[protectionist]

Trump has issues paying his bills. He fights his workers on unionizing. He is no champion of workers either. Neither candidate is but you can keep on believing otherwise. Billionaires dont care about the working class. They see them as cheap labor.

Don't believe everything you hear. Especially in a Hillary Clinton TV ad.

 

[alpine]

Better start asking yourself some hard questions, before we get any deeper into the presidential campaign. Maybe the first question is what would be the ramifications of a Hillary Clinton presidency. By this time only a blind toad doesn't realize that Hillary is a lying, money-grabbing, ruthless, opportunist, who will do anything to secure power, and hold on to it.

Making this worse, she is also a firmly established OUTSOURCER. For those who are not too up on that word allow me to elucidate. There are 2 basic types of outsourcing.

1. International - where the US jobs leave the US, go overseas, and utilize cheap, foreign labor.

2. Domestic - applies to those particular jobs that can only be done inside the USA (landscaping, construction, hotels, janitorial, etc) This is commonly accomplished by bringing the foreign labor to the US either by immigration or with visas.

Hillary is a notorious outsourcer on both of these types. On international outsourcing, she and Bill essentially invented NAFTA, she is a member of the Trilateral Commission, the Council on Foreign Relations, and a strong supporter of TPP (up until it recently became expedient for her to oppose it, in an ELECTION YEAR) If anyone is snowed by her anti-outsourcing TV ads, I've got a bridge in Brooklyn waiting for them.

On the domestic outsourcing end, Hillary has openly stated her support for the DREAM Act, and says she would expand it further. Well of course, like all Democrats, she is totally in favor of amnesty for illegal aliens, and laughably refers to it "comprehensive immigration reform". She has also supported Sanctuary Cities, and just about anything else that helps bring more low-wage job-swiping foreigners into the country (who also swipe $123 Billion/yr out of our economy in remittances$$) Yup. And the "comprehensive" part is where all these dirt-poor, sandal-wearing, floppy hat aliens coming from 3rd world hellholes, repay them by giving them their VOTES, once they're here, which is the whole idea of it from the Democrats' perspective.

But what does all this mean to YOU, Mr. and Mrs. American, working, taxpaying stiff ? Whether you are White, Black, Brown, Yellow, or whatever race or religion, or ethnicity, what it means if that if Hillary were to be elected, we could very well see an avalanche of 3rd world migration into the US, with many of them going straight on welfare rolls that YOU are paying for (with your taxes very likely going up to pay for the added costs) and many of the new arrivals taking jobs. Jobs ? What jobs ?

YOUR job, that's what job. Don't think so ? Better look a little deeper. All over America, for 10 years now, foreigners have been replacing Americans in everything from landscaping to construction to truck diving, etc, etc. And STEM jobs aren't immune either. In fact, they're right in the forefront. I saw a list recently of over 200 companies whose long-time American workers were fired to open up jobs for lower-wage foreigners, with the Americans being forced to train the less-qualified foreigners, or less lose their severance packages. They were also threatened to keep quiet about it.

And would Hillary exacerbate this anti-American situation ? No question is easier to answer. Of course she would/will, because unlike Donald Trump (a nationalist), Hillary is a pure INTERnationlaist (AKA "Globalist), who sees the world map as land masses without national borders. More easy for here to make money that way, but more importantly right now, it is from Hillary's perspective a way to pile up the VOTE COUNTS that she needs to avoid another 2008 defeat, gain a victory in 2016, get Democrats elected to Congress in 2018, and get herself re-elected, with no trouble, in 2020.

And your job ? And your livelihood ? Forget it. You won't have one. You'll be considered just a bothersome inconvenience for Hillary to sweep away. And your chance to get welfare when you lose your job ? Not too great, since the stress on welfare budgets will be enormous - you'll be in competition with millions of new Hillary voters, both on the job and off it.

I dont think anyone will lose their jobs, if they agreed to compete with wages around the world of course.

Thats how it works, you can't just force businesses in this country to hire expensive American labor, when there are much cheaper alternatives...

If you did, you would be a socialist, and a communist, and a liberal democrat too... not?

 

[protectionist]

50 people? Yep, you're nuts.

That's what information-deprived liberals generally say when they finally get the information we conservatives have known for years. Forums like this are their savior from their liberal OMISSION media.

Here they are. Pictures and all. Spend the rest of the day reading about them.

THE CLINTON BODY-COUNT | WHAT REALLY HAPPENED

 

[protectionist]

I dont think anyone will lose their jobs, if they agreed to compete with wages around the world of course.

Thats how it works, you can't just force businesses in this country to hire expensive American labor, when there are much cheaper alternatives...

If you did, you would be a socialist, and a communist, and a liberal democrat too... not?

Which confirms the OP >>> Elect Hillary - Kiss your job goodbye.

 

[protectionist]

What you think is pretty jumbled up so that doesn't really count. Trump brand is an item that he sells under his name, and outsourcing is having it made in other countries.

According to your definition of "Trump-brand" the products you are calling "Trump-brand' are NOT "Trump-brand". Trump is not selling them. They are owned by other sellers who merely pay Trump a one-time-fee for the use of the Trump name, to be put on their products.
And the products you call Trump-brand are not outsourcing, either. In the case of Mexican ones, for instance, many, if not most, were always made in Mexico, not transferred there.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

HRC is a terrible choice for president, but if people like protectionist et al are supporting Trump, then he must be worse by association.

Vote Gary Johnson.

Now that's a smart idea. Vote for somebody that doesn't stand a chance in hell at winning.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

As I recall, the American workforce did very well under the original Clinton presidency.

There's no reason to believe that the same won't happen under President Clinton v2.0.

Sure, all she has to to is clinch on to a new bubble like her husband did during our most technological advances in this country, and she'll do just fine.

 

[alpine]

I dont think anyone will lose their jobs, if they agreed to compete with wages around the world of course.

Thats how it works, you can't just force businesses in this country to hire expensive American labor, when there are much cheaper alternatives...

If you did, you would be a socialist, and a communist, and a liberal democrat too... not?

Which confirms the OP >>> Elect Hillary - Kiss your job goodbye.

Nothing FREE in this world.

American work force should have realized this long ago.
They will be replaced by either a chinese boy, or a machine, sooner or later.

What Trump is suggesting and guaranteed to dump the first day in office;
American enterprise would be forced to hire American labor.

That is called "WELFARE STATE"...
To support hard working American families on the backs of high and mighty corporations...
What a big NO NO...

And American conservatives better start preparing themselves to suck it up,
because thats what they have been cheering for years... not?

 

[JakeStarkey]

HRC is a terrible choice for president, but if people like protectionist et al are supporting Trump, then he must be worse by association.

Vote Gary Johnson.

Now that's a smart idea. Vote for somebody that doesn't stand a chance in hell at winning.

Of the three, Ray, Donald is the worst, HRC is unacceptable, and Gary is fine.

 

[BULLDOG]

What you think is pretty jumbled up so that doesn't really count. Trump brand is an item that he sells under his name, and outsourcing is having it made in other countries.

According to your definition of "Trump-brand" the products you are calling "Trump-brand' are NOT "Trump-brand". Trump is not selling them. They are owned by other sellers who merely pay Trump a one-time-fee for the use of the Trump name, to be put on their products.
And the products you call Trump-brand are not outsourcing, either. In the case of Mexican ones, for instance, many, if not most, were always made in Mexico, not transferred there.

Trump's name is on them. The spread sheet link I gave shows only products that were imported to the US.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Now that Trump has thrown in with the free trade GOP establishment you can say goodbye to any dreams you had about rolling back free trade.

Actually I thought I heard Trump say NAFTA was the worst agreement we ever made and it needs to be modified so that we are not throwing jobs away.

 

[protectionist]

HRC is a terrible choice for president, but if people like protectionist et al are supporting Trump, then he must be worse by association.

Vote Gary Johnson.

Looking at Gary Johnson's website, I only had to look at ONE of his listed issues (immigration) to conclude that he was disqualified. He is purely in favor of not only giving amnesty to illegal aliens (taking millions of jobs away from American workers + allowing $123 Billion/yr to be extracted out of the US economy + tens of Billions$ more lost to welfare), but this lunatic wants to open up the borders entirely, and allow as many migrants to come into the country as they would like. Pheeeeew!! Is there a doctor in the house ?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Of the three, Ray, Donald is the worst, HRC is unacceptable, and Gary is fine.

He may be fine, but that doesn't change the fact he stands no chance of winning. If you're going to vote for him, you might as well write-in PeeWee Herman. You'll end up with the same results.

 

[BULLDOG]

Now that Trump has thrown in with the free trade GOP establishment you can say goodbye to any dreams you had about rolling back free trade.

Actually I thought I heard Trump say NAFTA was the worst agreement we ever made and it needs to be modified so that we are not throwing jobs away.

Trump says a lot of things. They usually contradict what he has said before.

 

[protectionist]

Actually I thought I heard Trump say NAFTA was the worst agreement we ever made and it needs to be modified so that we are not throwing jobs away.

You are correct. Expect to hear things from the left that are 180 degrees opposite of the truth. It's what they do. Especially with Hillary running. Nothing but lies.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

rump says a lot of things. They usually contradict what he has said before.

You mean like gay marriage????

 

[protectionist]

He may be fine, but that doesn't change the fact he stands no chance of winning. If you're going to vote for him, you might as well write-in PeeWee Herman. You'll end up with the same result.

He is NOT fine. He is a total, reckless immigrationist, who would wreck the country, same as Hillary.

 

[yiostheoy]

Hillary will be elected. Might as well get used to it now.

Trump is insane. Everyone sees it now.

Very few voters will vote for him now. There will be a few but not many.

Trump no longer stands a chance.

His is a bizarre show in a travelling circus.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

He is NOT fine. He is a total, reckless immigrationist, who would wreck the country, same as Hillary.

Well I don't know because I never took the time to look into what he's for or against. Why waste the time?

We're still in global warming up north so I tend to spend a lot of time outside. Figured I would do more research on other candidates (just for shits and giggles) when I had more time during the colder months when global warming leaves for the season.

 

[protectionist]

Trump says a lot of things. They usually contradict what he has said before.

That's what Hillary does. She said she was against illegal immigration. Now she supports it. She was for TPP. Suddenly now (in an ELECTION YEAR), She's against it. She's a flip-flopper.