Will Trump Win?...

[Dschrute3]

Interesting piece by Michael S. Rozeff of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


At Trump’s command, the US military is adding forces and use of force everywhere: Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Afghanistan and Korea. Victory is ill-defined in all these places, but the question remains. Will Trump win?

I predict that he will lose, and so America will lose. In Korea, we’ve been at the Yalu once before and China entered North Korea in numbers, throwing American forces back to the 38th parallel. That simply means that China is not going to buckle under to Trump. He won’t win there. In Afghanistan, there is no way he’ll win. The reconstituted Taliban shows that. Somalia has been a losing ground for the US military once before and will be again. Trump will not devote the enormous numbers of boots on the ground that it would take really to win in either Afghanistan or Somalia.

The more that the US military presence goes up in Iraq and Yemen, the more that it means the US is not winning anything. At best the US neutralizes ISIS in that region, i.e. restores the previous unstable status quo. The US lost in Iraq, and that won’t change. A continued and heightened presence is a resource drain and a recruiting tool for extremists...

Read More:
Will Trump Win?

What a moron this guy is. He says, "Victory is ill-defined in all these places, but the question remains. Will Trump win?" So he doesn't know what he means by winning, but he asks will Trump win.

Pretty much proves a 'Win' isn't possible in these countries. So let's get out.

It pretty much proves rational thought isn't possible for members of Ron Paul's cult.

How so?

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

 

[Marion Morrison]

What a moron this guy is. He says, "Victory is ill-defined in all these places, but the question remains. Will Trump win?" So he doesn't know what he means by winning, but he asks will Trump win.

Pretty much proves a 'Win' isn't possible in these countries. So let's get out.

It pretty much proves rational thought isn't possible for members of Ron Paul's cult.

How so?

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

Kicking your ass.

 

[Dschrute3]

Interesting piece by Michael S. Rozeff of the Ron Paul Institute for Peace and Prosperity.


At Trump’s command, the US military is adding forces and use of force everywhere: Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Afghanistan and Korea. Victory is ill-defined in all these places, but the question remains. Will Trump win?

I predict that he will lose, and so America will lose. In Korea, we’ve been at the Yalu once before and China entered North Korea in numbers, throwing American forces back to the 38th parallel. That simply means that China is not going to buckle under to Trump. He won’t win there. In Afghanistan, there is no way he’ll win. The reconstituted Taliban shows that. Somalia has been a losing ground for the US military once before and will be again. Trump will not devote the enormous numbers of boots on the ground that it would take really to win in either Afghanistan or Somalia.

The more that the US military presence goes up in Iraq and Yemen, the more that it means the US is not winning anything. At best the US neutralizes ISIS in that region, i.e. restores the previous unstable status quo. The US lost in Iraq, and that won’t change. A continued and heightened presence is a resource drain and a recruiting tool for extremists...

Read More:
Will Trump Win?

China cannot afford to back korea. Without trade with the USA they go bankrupt and the people starve. They need us alot more than we need them.

We'll see. North Korea's been a loyal ally of China's for many years.

who does China need more?....us or the little fat fuck,kim is a pain in their ass while we are $ in their ass....no one on this planet would care if they took the guy out,especially the Korean people....

Maybe Trump has struck a deal with China? Maybe China will take him out. I think that's a real possibility. I mean, Trump sure did flip-flop dramatically on his China 'manipulating currency' accusation. He met with the Chinese leader, and the very next day he changed his tune completely. So maybe they struck a deal. China kills Kim Jong Un, and Trump goes easy on China's shady trade practices. It's possible. Stay tuned.

 

[Dschrute3]

Pretty much proves a 'Win' isn't possible in these countries. So let's get out.

It pretty much proves rational thought isn't possible for members of Ron Paul's cult.

How so?

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

Kicking your ass.

Ha, pretty funny. Ya got me. But seriously, what would you call a 'Win' is these quagmire wars? I'm a fair person. I'm willing to listen.

 

[toomuchtime_]

What a moron this guy is. He says, "Victory is ill-defined in all these places, but the question remains. Will Trump win?" So he doesn't know what he means by winning, but he asks will Trump win.

Pretty much proves a 'Win' isn't possible in these countries. So let's get out.

It pretty much proves rational thought isn't possible for members of Ron Paul's cult.

How so?

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

lol You're the one who is making claims about "winning" without knowing what you mean by "winning".

 

[Dschrute3]

Pretty much proves a 'Win' isn't possible in these countries. So let's get out.

It pretty much proves rational thought isn't possible for members of Ron Paul's cult.

How so?

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

lol You're the one who is making claims about "winning" without knowing what you mean by "winning".

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

 

[toomuchtime_]

It pretty much proves rational thought isn't possible for members of Ron Paul's cult.

How so?

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

lol You're the one who is making claims about "winning" without knowing what you mean by "winning".

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

 

[Dschrute3]

How so?

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

lol You're the one who is making claims about "winning" without knowing what you mean by "winning".

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Were you capable of rational thought you wouldn't ask that question. How can you decide if Trump can win if you don't know what winning means?

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

lol You're the one who is making claims about "winning" without knowing what you mean by "winning".

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

 

[Dschrute3]

What's your definition of 'Winning.' I'm open-minded. Go for it.

lol You're the one who is making claims about "winning" without knowing what you mean by "winning".

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

How so?

 

[toomuchtime_]

lol You're the one who is making claims about "winning" without knowing what you mean by "winning".

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

How so?

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

 

[BULLDOG]

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

How so?

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

For Trump. winning is having PR that isn't too bad. What the result of any negotiations, international treaties, the economy, or anything else doesn't really matter.

 

[toomuchtime_]

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

How so?

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

For Trump. winning is having PR that isn't too bad. What the result of any negotiations, international treaties, the economy, or anything else doesn't really matter.

In other words the fact that you don't like President Trump is your all purpose answer to every question.

 

[BULLDOG]

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

How so?

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

For Trump. winning is having PR that isn't too bad. What the result of any negotiations, international treaties, the economy, or anything else doesn't really matter.

In other words the fact that you don't like President Trump is your all purpose answer to every question.

No. Trump has made it clear he is in over his head, and he doesn't much care about learning anything.

 

[toomuchtime_]

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

How so?

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

For Trump. winning is having PR that isn't too bad. What the result of any negotiations, international treaties, the economy, or anything else doesn't really matter.

In other words the fact that you don't like President Trump is your all purpose answer to every question.

No. Trump has made it clear he is in over his head, and he doesn't much care about learning anything.

There you go again, every questions gets the same answer, you don't like President Trump.

 

[BULLDOG]

How so?

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

For Trump. winning is having PR that isn't too bad. What the result of any negotiations, international treaties, the economy, or anything else doesn't really matter.

In other words the fact that you don't like President Trump is your all purpose answer to every question.

No. Trump has made it clear he is in over his head, and he doesn't much care about learning anything.

There you go again, every questions gets the same answer, you don't like President Trump.

No. I don;t like the fool, but my opinion of him isn't why he keeps doing such stupid things.

 

[toomuchtime_]

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

For Trump. winning is having PR that isn't too bad. What the result of any negotiations, international treaties, the economy, or anything else doesn't really matter.

In other words the fact that you don't like President Trump is your all purpose answer to every question.

No. Trump has made it clear he is in over his head, and he doesn't much care about learning anything.

There you go again, every questions gets the same answer, you don't like President Trump.

No. I don;t like the fool, but my opinion of him isn't why he keeps doing such stupid things.

You appear to have no other opinions but that you don't like President Trump.

 

[jc456]

It assumes quite a lot that hasn't happened.

Trump has already won. He has sent a clear message to the world.

'Trump has already won?' You so sure about that?

yep!!!

 

[Dschrute3]

There are no more 'Wins.' There are only endless bloody quagmires. It's the very sad result of these numerous undeclared wars.

lol You don't know what a "win" is but you know it's not possible. What is Ron Paul putting in the koolaide these days?

You're not saying anything. What's a 'Win' for you? And check out the OP. Read it. It's pretty interesting.

It's nonsense as I pointed out previously.

How so?

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

No you merely fixated on one thing i stated, and insulting me. It doesn't appear you actually read the article. Let me know when you finish reading it.

 

[9thIDdoc]

I have explained that several times, but apparently you are incapable of understanding why talking about winning when you don't know what winning means is idiocy.

For Trump. winning is having PR that isn't too bad. What the result of any negotiations, international treaties, the economy, or anything else doesn't really matter.

In other words the fact that you don't like President Trump is your all purpose answer to every question.

No. Trump has made it clear he is in over his head, and he doesn't much care about learning anything.

There you go again, every questions gets the same answer, you don't like President Trump.

No. I don;t like the fool, but my opinion of him isn't why he keeps doing such stupid things.

But your opinion is likely the reason you keep saying such stupid things.