You want a vastly longer list for dems?Well, I do like Big Willies stance on socialist taxation.
He's very much against it.
But he would have to run as a dem, rumor has it he fucks around on his wife, a lot, and that's not acceptable to people with any moral standards.
You think republicans have moral standards? You want a long list of examples to prove you wrong?
of course not, cuz you know that list is incredibly long
If you will stick with real events that have been proven and not the long list of unfounded accusations that the right constantly spews,I don't have a problem with it.,
See the irony in this far left drones post?
To them they thin that one can prove a negative..
When two parties are in a discussion and one asserts a claim that the other disputes, the one who asserts has a burden of proof to justify or substantiate that claim. [1] An argument from ignorance occurs when either a proposition is assumed to be true because it has not yet been proved false or a proposition is assumed to be false because it has not yet been proved true.[2][3] This has the effect of shifting the burden of proof to the person criticizing the proposition.[4]
Philosophic burden of proof - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia