buckeye45_73
Lakhota's my *****
- Jun 4, 2011
- 33,635
- 7,119
- 1,130
He is, he's freeing us from the public sector unions. GOD almighty, FREE at last!!!!!!!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh for chrissakes don't drag out that nonsense that somehow conservatives are only anti-labor when it comes to public sector unions.
You're a fucking idiot. I despise and wish to eliminate all public employee unions, and am 100% behind private sector unions.
Oh for chrissakes don't drag out that nonsense that somehow conservatives are only anti-labor when it comes to public sector unions.
You're a fucking idiot. I despise and wish to eliminate all public employee unions, and am 100% behind private sector unions.
It's the liberal mentality, your either like all unions or you hate all unions, you either love government and every thing the do or you want no government and on and on the liberal black and white mindset sits.
Does anyone know, for a FACT, whether Scott Walker exaggerated and/or manufactured the Wisconsin budget crisis to bust unions? I've heard and read conflicting reports, so I honestly don't know. Maybe the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but I'd really like to know the truth.
Does anyone know, for a FACT, whether Scott Walker exaggerated and/or manufactured the Wisconsin budget crisis to bust unions? I've heard and read conflicting reports, so I honestly don't know. Maybe the truth lies somewhere in the middle, but I'd really like to know the truth.
Well, apparently no one else knows the truth, either.
There is no doubt that Walker busted unions - but was it justified to balance the budget?
There is no doubt that Walker busted unions - but was it justified to balance the budget?
When the Unions are financed by the Taxpayers... ABSOLUTELY!!!! I've said it before, when "Public" Unions realize that people (The Taxpayers) are FED UP supporting a system which rewards workers NOT by their performance, but by their "Tenure" -maybe then will the Unions understand why there are in an UPHILL battle with the Taxpayers. The Gravy Train is over, and the Taxpayers want results... NOT "no-loads" bilking the system simply to "endure" their time before they land their golden benefits package. Perhaps if the Unions would have paid less attention to the "what's in it for ME" ideology, and more to the "what's in it for US", the Public might have been more forgiving when they cast their votes. In the Economy we are in at the moment, it's very hard to justify rewarding people on the Taxpayer's dime who simply put out an inferior product at a price the public simply cannot afford.
Out of every dollar that funds Wisconsin's pension and health insurance plans for state workers, 100 cents comes from the state workers.
How can that be? Because the "contributions" consist of money that employees chose to take as deferred wages – as pensions when they retire – rather than take immediately in cash. The same is true with the health care plan. If this were not so a serious crime would be taking place, the gift of public funds rather than payment for services.
Thus, state workers are not being asked to simply "contribute more" to Wisconsin' s retirement system (or as the argument goes, "pay their fair share" of retirement costs as do employees in Wisconsin' s private sector who still have pensions and health insurance). They are being asked to accept a cut in their salaries so that the state of Wisconsin can use the money to fill the hole left by tax cuts and reduced audits of corporations in Wisconsin.
Lakhota, I hate to be the bearer of bad tidings, but you have answered your OP multiple times in the affirmative.
Please direct me to some of my answers in the affirmative. Seriously.