- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,466
- 10,043
- 900
Obama had approval number highs of around 67% back when he first came into office...that's down substantially now. What's startling though is his disapproval numbers that were at 13% when he took office and have now hovered between the high 40's and low 50's for most of his Presidency. THOSE are the Gallop Poll numbers that jump out at you!
Again... MSM bias influences people polled!
Why is it so hard to understand that the MSM made Obama!
I'm going to repeat again and again for people who still don't comprehend the gross misperception provided by the MSM!
THESE ARE FACTS...
1) In 2008 85% of media donated money to Democrats!
1,160 (85%) of the 1,353 of the Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democrats candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.
Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters
2) 130,213 stories can't be swept under the rug that show that the Democrat Bias is very evident!
Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election BY PAUL BEDARD | MARCH 16, 2015 | 10:49 AM
A sweeping study of some 130,213 news articles on the 2012 presidential match between President Obama and Mitt Romney has proven anew
that there was a strong pro-Democratic bias in the U.S. and international press.
The study, published in the authoritative journal Big Data Society, also tested the campaign themes the media focused on and determined that Obama succeeded in stealing the economic issue from Republican Romney.
"Overall, media reporting contained more frequently positive statements about the Democrats than the Republicans.
Overall, the Republicans were more frequently the object of negative statements," wrote the study authors, Their conclusion:
"The Republican Party is the most divisive subject in the campaign, and is portrayed in a more negative fashion than the Democrats."
Paul Bedard, the Washington Examiner's "Washington Secrets" columnist, can be contacted at [email protected].
Smooch: Study of 130,213 stories shows Obama bias in 2012 election
So in simple terms...why would the MSM if they donated money to elect Obama write any negative stories about Obama? They wouldn't! They gave money so why then
would they turn around and publish news that would be harmful? And in 2012 the above analysis of 130,213 stories shows a pro-Democrat bias!
Why do you people have a problem in understanding how manipulated you were regarding Obama?