I find really desperate by some of our far right loyalist to cry from the hills, "see, there were WMD's".
First of all, everytime the US did a WMD hunt they came up empty with anything that wasn't made prior to 1991.
There is no logical reason that if WMD's made after 1991 were found that the Bush Administration and the Blair Administration wouldn't of been pounding their chests telling the World and America, "we found the WMDs. Let's look at reality here. The fact the there were no WMD's as described in the build up to invading Iraq were found, is an embarrassment to the Bushies and to Blair.
They would of never remained silent, their pride and legacy has been severely damaged by the lack of WMDs. They pushed and pushed to have them found perDavid Kay. It's not like Bush and Blair didn't do everythig they could to find the WMD's.
Finally, in the tidbit referring the Wikileaks within the thread starter, doesn't put any dates as to the era of the weapon componets found. So therefore there seems to be a lot of assumptions made.
First of all, everytime the US did a WMD hunt they came up empty with anything that wasn't made prior to 1991.
There is no logical reason that if WMD's made after 1991 were found that the Bush Administration and the Blair Administration wouldn't of been pounding their chests telling the World and America, "we found the WMDs. Let's look at reality here. The fact the there were no WMD's as described in the build up to invading Iraq were found, is an embarrassment to the Bushies and to Blair.
They would of never remained silent, their pride and legacy has been severely damaged by the lack of WMDs. They pushed and pushed to have them found perDavid Kay. It's not like Bush and Blair didn't do everythig they could to find the WMD's.
Finally, in the tidbit referring the Wikileaks within the thread starter, doesn't put any dates as to the era of the weapon componets found. So therefore there seems to be a lot of assumptions made.
Last edited: