Most people that kept up with the news are aware of this, however the general opinion was formed by the 'no wmd', 'Bush lied' mantras. WikiLeaks Show WMD Hunt Continued in Iraq – With Surprising Results | Danger Room | Wired.com
That's why I started a new thread, not going off I think, Mal's. As I said, this certainly isn't 'news' to those paying attention, but some in the media especially didn't want that part getting out during the war downturn.
Maliki think they were released to upset his bid for PM For Iraq?s Maliki, Wikileaks Raises Uncomfortable Questions | Neon Tommy
And I will repeat for the millionth time, democrats and other world leaders talked about saddam's weapons of mass destruction long before Bush came along. There was a general belief that saddam had wmds.
and a little more of 'unexpected' releases: WikiLeaks nails the wild Lancet scare | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog Lots of links at site:
"The smoking gun will be a mushroom cloud" Condi Rice Far from grounds for an invasion that killed over 80,000 people
It's like the world was wrong (including Saddam) but our liberals were right. They demanded the release of this info, now they can suffer the truth.
We did not attack Sadam because he had some half degraded blistering agent. Why do you think Bush did not try to claim this find as his great success?