Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I am a Democrat because I believe in women's right to choose. I mean, not a church school or a tax shelter, or something like that, obviously. Let's be reasonable.For a party that prides itself on being pro-choice, you sure seem to have a problem with strong-intelligent women thinking and voting for themselves.
I suspect Lakhota wears the apron in his family..
Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
I suspect Lakhota wears the apron in his family..
Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
Funny how you can call American conservatives the Taliban, but you never condemn the Muslim Taliban for treating women like property.
And by "funny", I mean "utterly pathetic and predictable".
Since American Taliban wingnuts don't currently have the power to overturn Roe v. Wade, they just keep trying to undermine it through the back door.
You don't think at all. And you're not qualified to determine what other people's interests are.Wealthy women have never had difficulty getting abortions on demand. Not when abortions were illegal, and not now, either.
So really reproductive rights are STILL a CLASS ISSUE.
I think women will tend to vote with their perceived class interests.
Since American Taliban wingnuts don't currently have the power to overturn Roe v. Wade, they just keep trying to undermine it through the back door.
Why do male posters ASSUME women are Pro Abortion in the first place? Hmmm...
Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
Funny how you can call American conservatives the Taliban, but you never condemn the Muslim Taliban for treating women like property.
And by "funny", I mean "utterly pathetic and predictable".
And Note that Statist groups as the NAGS (*National Association of Gals*)...have yet to condemn the Taliban
Same fruit...different trees, different continent.Funny how you can call American conservatives the Taliban, but you never condemn the Muslim Taliban for treating women like property.
And by "funny", I mean "utterly pathetic and predictable".
And Note that Statist groups as the NAGS (*National Association of Gals*)...have yet to condemn the Taliban
The left never met a murderous totalitarian regime they didn't love.
I suspect Lakhota wears the apron in his family..
Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
I suspect Lakhota wears the apron in his family..
Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
Oh gee. Thanks for letting me know. As a Republican woman, I would never have figured that out. Thank you for enlightening me.
Sheesh.
I think the nation is strong enough to hold back a few social conservatives from making abortion illegal.
But it's still very much in question whether the nation is strong enough to say 'no' to liberals who would entice people into trading their liberty for unsustainable, initiative-sapping entitlements.
Republicans hate women, unions, immigrants, gays, blacks, muslims, the middle class, and anyone who is not part of the oil companies, the coal companies, or Wall Street.
.. see, you're a nut..
I suspect Lakhota wears the apron in his family..
Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
Oh gee. Thanks for letting me know. As a Republican woman, I would never have figured that out. Thank you for enlightening me.
Sheesh.
I think the nation is strong enough to hold back a few social conservatives from making abortion illegal.
But it's still very much in question whether the nation is strong enough to say 'no' to liberals who would entice people into trading their liberty for unsustainable, initiative-sapping entitlements.
Better choices than the dimwits who support the murder of unborn children. And stop with the lame "womens right to choose" bull. A woman who elects to have an abortion because she doesn't want the child is nothing more than a murderer. Typical idiot dimwit post.By Amanda Marcotte, Alternet
Here are some predictions for where the anti-choice movement will try to go in 2012.
Has there been a more sustained assault on women's rights in recent memory as what we saw in 2011? Republicans swept the House and many state governments in the 2010 election, and made attacking reproductive rights a major priority, right next to destroying union power and making it harder for students, poor people and people of color to vote. Republicans waged war on womens ability to pay for an abortion, get an abortion without being needlessly hassled, get an abortion at a location within a days drive, or access affordable contraception. It seemed like not a week passed without another outrageous attack on womens rights. Its tempting to think that 2012 has to be better, on the grounds that it cant be much worse.
But I wouldnt breathe easy just yet. At the end of 2009, we also thought wed seen the worst, between the Stupak Amendment to the Affordable Health Care Act that eventually will end private insurance coverage of abortion and the murder of Dr. George Tiller, an abortion provider who had survived decades of harassment at the hands of anti-choice extremists. Little did we know that 2011 was around the corner. With that in mind, here are some predictions for where the anti-choice movement will try to go in 2012:
Much More: 5 Dirty Tricks Right-Wing Zealots Will Likely Try Next in Their Battle to Control Women | Gender | AlterNet
All of them idiot.Republicans hate women, unions, immigrants, gays, blacks, muslims, the middle class, and anyone who is not part of the oil companies, the coal companies, or Wall Street.
Uhh, which one was he wrong about?
Republicans hate women, unions, immigrants, gays, blacks, muslims, the middle class, and anyone who is not part of the oil companies, the coal companies, or Wall Street.
As a matter of course they do...but it isn't so much hate as it is is controlling them for political expediency...and Note? How they vote?Republicans hate women, unions, immigrants, gays, blacks, muslims, the middle class, and anyone who is not part of the oil companies, the coal companies, or Wall Street.
Democrats hate all of the above, but they also hate whites, jews and anyone who doesn't let them confiscate their money and property without question.......
Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
Oh gee. Thanks for letting me know. As a Republican woman, I would never have figured that out. Thank you for enlightening me.
Sheesh.
I think the nation is strong enough to hold back a few social conservatives from making abortion illegal.
But it's still very much in question whether the nation is strong enough to say 'no' to liberals who would entice people into trading their liberty for unsustainable, initiative-sapping entitlements.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTwpBLzxe4U"]Craig T. Nelson on Government Aid - YouTube[/ame]
Nobody helped him out. No one at all. Except for the government. Unless his "food stamps and welfare" fell from the sky.
Since American Taliban wingnuts don't currently have the power to overturn Roe v. Wade, they just keep trying to undermine it through the back door.
Wow, a mindless DittoTard parroting his MessiahRushie. How original!Nope, but females are equal to males! If males were under assault, I would expect females to also come to our defense.
Funny how you can call American conservatives the Taliban, but you never condemn the Muslim Taliban for treating women like property.
And by "funny", I mean "utterly pathetic and predictable".
And Note that Statist groups as the NAGS (*National Association of Gals*)...have yet to condemn the Taliban
