Why we have a "problem" with guns un the US

[M14 Shooter]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

 

[Arianrhod]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

 

[M14 Shooter]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem.

Huh. That's what I said.
And, that problem is tiny.

 

[Defiant1]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

Don't leave your house without your helmet.

 

[Arianrhod]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem.

Huh. That's what I said.
And, that problem is tiny.

As long as you're not the one getting shot.

Will you give the "More Americans die in auto accidents" speech now?

 

[Defiant1]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem.

Huh. That's what I said.
And, that problem is tiny.

As long as you're not the one getting shot.

Will you give the "More Americans die in auto accidents" speech now?

Not me. I believe in natural selection.

 

[Arianrhod]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem.

Huh. That's what I said.
And, that problem is tiny.

As long as you're not the one getting shot.

Will you give the "More Americans die in auto accidents" speech now?

Not me. I believe in natural selection.

As long as you're not the one "selected."

 

[Conservative65]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

People with knives cut tomatoes. The knife can't use itself just like a gun can't shoot itself.

 

[Arianrhod]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

People with knives cut tomatoes. The knife can't use itself just like a gun can't shoot itself.

So as I said upthread, the problem must be Americans, because statistically Americans are much more violent than anyone else in the industrialized world. Just look at the amount of ANGER!!!! in these forums.

 

[Compost]

Maybe if the government passed out guns to everybody for free like they do with condoms, leftists would start to see guns as a right.

 

[Katzndogz]

If you look at the countries with the highest number of gun related deaths, they are in Africa and Latin America.

List of countries by firearm-related death rate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

We have an immigrant problem, not a gun problem. Without immigrants from dangerous countries we would have an extraordinary low death rate from firearms.

 

[Compost]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

People with knives cut tomatoes. The knife can't use itself just like a gun can't shoot itself.

So as I said upthread, the problem must be Americans, because statistically Americans are much more violent than anyone else in the industrialized world. Just look at the amount of ANGER!!!! in these forums.

Anger? You are the one promoting violence upon tomatoes.

 

[Conservative65]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

People with knives cut tomatoes. The knife can't use itself just like a gun can't shoot itself.

So as I said upthread, the problem must be Americans, because statistically Americans are much more violent than anyone else in the industrialized world. Just look at the amount of ANGER!!!! in these forums.

So someone that gets angry is automatically violent?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

Anti-gun illogic.
That picture shows a world without knives. Pretty stupid. The same logic applies to guns. People with knives cut tomatoes, people with guns shoot people.
Put a knife next to that tomato and see what happens. Add a person and see what happens.

 

[Defiant1]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem.

Huh. That's what I said.
And, that problem is tiny.

As long as you're not the one getting shot.

Will you give the "More Americans die in auto accidents" speech now?

Not me. I believe in natural selection.

As long as you're not the one "selected."

I prefer to be a selector, not a selectee.

 

[Arianrhod]

If you look at the countries with the highest number of gun related deaths, they are in Africa and Latin America.

And if you're proud to find America competing with those countries in body count, I'd question your motives.

 

[Iron Head]

The only gun problem I see is that we do not have enough of them and that we don't have greater access to automatic weapons.

 

[Pogo]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

Does the point of this thread cost extra?

 

[Conservative65]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

Anti-gun illogic.
That picture shows a world without knives. Pretty stupid. The same logic applies to guns. People with knives cut tomatoes, people with guns shoot people.
Put a knife next to that tomato and see what happens. Add a person and see what happens.

That knife won't cut by itself just like that gun won't pull it's own trigger.

 

[Auld Phart]

(This topic assumes for the moment that we do, indeed, have a 'gun problem" in the US, regardless as to how absurd reality demonstrates that notion to be.}

Q: Why do we have a "gun problem" in the us?
A: 318.9 million people is a HUGE sample size; with such a huge sample size, tiny percentages turn into anecdotally noticeable numbers.

Q: What's the solution to that problem?
A: There is no sound solution to statistical anomalies.

If you take any other nation as a sample size, are the percentages the same? Show your work.

We don't have a "gun problem"; we have a people problem. Americans must be innately more violent than any other people. Because, after all:

no, that's Liberal Logic

and it's people like this that want to ban Assault Weapons.