Why they put warning labels on everything

[excalibur]

Stupid people, is why. Very stupid people. Like this very stupid person. LOL

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Stupid people, is why. Very stupid people. Like this very stupid person. LOL

.

I had someone else totally in mind as the answer to that, but if I say it, I'll likely get smacked.

sigh

.

 

[initforme]

Seems that the ladder manufacturer has failed here.

 

[Donald H]

The step ladder failed under conditions of use that shouldn't have caused failure.

Suspect that the label missing was the UL or CSA label.

 

[jknowgood]

The step ladder failed under conditions of use that shouldn't have caused failure.

Suspect that the label missing was the UL or CSA label.

You sound like an ambulance chaser.

 

[initforme]

Cheap garbage like that demands s lawsuit.

 

[Resnic]

Cheap garbage like that demands s lawsuit.

I'm sure the cheap little ladder had a label on it about it's maximum weight that I have no doubt that person exceeded.

And also, when you misuse a ladder like that it's your own fault. No one anywhere has ever said that is an acceptable way to move a ladder.

Lawsuit my ass. That dipshits did everything wrong.

 

[petro]

Fat ass exceeds the fat rating for cheap aluminum.
It is obvious she ignored the no fatties lable.

 

[initforme]

Shut down the manufacturer

 

[drudge X]

Because common sense is no so common.

 

[petro]

She is fine.
Built in airbags and all.

 

[Alice in Chains]

However, if she took them to court, she would no doubt win twenty million. Despite all the things mentioned.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Why? Because people like the OP need them.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

Seems that the ladder manufacturer has failed here.

Of course you would think that. It’s corporations fault! Do you know every ladder has a weight rating posted on the side? The ladder in the video likely has a rating of 200-225 lbs. it’s a light duty ladder. Big boy is pushing 310-320.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The step ladder failed under conditions of use that shouldn't have caused failure.

Suspect that the label missing was the UL or CSA label.

Wrong. The dude was too heavy for that ladder. Ladders are not made to be scooted. The dude is a moron and should not be on a ladder .

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Since when an over weight load tries to scoot a lightweight non-scootable ladder should be held liable?

 

[wamose]

That fat fuck could probably collapse the Verrazano Bridge.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Stupid people, is why. Very stupid people. Like this very stupid person. LOL

Congratulations. You cracked the code.

 

[sparky]

~S~

 

[Maxdeath]

First problem is all labels have been removed from the ladder.
second is you can see the ladder lex so you know that it is being stressed.
third is the person is obviously unaware of how to properly use a ladder. Which points to a lack of proper training.
fourth and final problem is this person obviously needs proper supervision at all times but has none.

Now all that being said is this the manufacturers fault? No since all required labels are missing, the ladder was obviously being overloaded and being moved in an inappropriate manner by an untrained person. If the person decided to try and sue the owner of the ladder and the manufacturer they would probably win. Why because it is easier to find people that would prefer to hand this person money then to use their common sense.